Preprint Hypothesis Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Principle of Continuous Biological Information Flow as the Fundamental Foundation for the Biological Sciences. Implications for Ageing Research

Version 1 : Received: 20 December 2020 / Approved: 21 December 2020 / Online: 21 December 2020 (11:12:31 CET)
Version 2 : Received: 25 March 2021 / Approved: 25 March 2021 / Online: 25 March 2021 (15:14:06 CET)

How to cite: Marsellach, X. The Principle of Continuous Biological Information Flow as the Fundamental Foundation for the Biological Sciences. Implications for Ageing Research. Preprints 2020, 2020120506 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202012.0506.v2). Marsellach, X. The Principle of Continuous Biological Information Flow as the Fundamental Foundation for the Biological Sciences. Implications for Ageing Research. Preprints 2020, 2020120506 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202012.0506.v2).

Abstract

The current state of biological knowledge contains an unresolved paradox: life as a continuity in the face of the phenomena of ageing. In this manuscript I propose a theoretical framework that offers a solution for this apparent contradiction. The framework proposed is based on a rethinking of what ageing is at a molecular level, as well as on a rethinking of the mechanisms in charge of the flow of information from one generation to the following ones. I propose an information-based conception of ageing instead of the widely accepted damage-based conception of ageing and propose a full recovery of the chromosome theory of inheritance to describe the intergenerational flow of information. Altogether the proposed framework allows a precise and unique definition of what life is: a continuous flow of biological information. The proposed framework also implies that ageing is merely a consequence of the way in which epigenetically-coded phenotypic characteristics are passed from one generation to the next ones.

Subject Areas

Ageing; Epigenetics

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 25 March 2021
Commenter: Xavi Marsellach
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: I have rewritten most of the last half part of the manuscript to make its reading more straightforward and to try to make the main ideas of the paper in a more understandable way.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.