Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Adverse Childhood Experiences and Risk of Subsequently Engaging in Self-Harm and Violence Towards Other People – ‘Dual Harm’

Version 1 : Received: 17 November 2020 / Approved: 18 November 2020 / Online: 18 November 2020 (23:47:07 CET)

How to cite: Carr, M.J.; Steeg, S.; Mok, P.L.H.; Bøcker Pedersen, C.; Antonsen, S.; Kapur, N.; Webb, R. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Risk of Subsequently Engaging in Self-Harm and Violence Towards Other People – ‘Dual Harm’. Preprints 2020, 2020110490 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202011.0490.v1). Carr, M.J.; Steeg, S.; Mok, P.L.H.; Bøcker Pedersen, C.; Antonsen, S.; Kapur, N.; Webb, R. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Risk of Subsequently Engaging in Self-Harm and Violence Towards Other People – ‘Dual Harm’. Preprints 2020, 2020110490 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202011.0490.v1).

Abstract

The etiology of ‘dual harm’ (the co-occurrence of self-harm and externalized violence in the same individual) is under-researched. Risk factors have mostly been investigated for each behavior separately. We aimed to examine adversities experienced between birth and age 15 years among adolescents and young adults with histories of self-harm and violent criminality, with a specific focus on dual harm. Three nested case-control studies were delineated using national interlinked Danish registers; 58,409 cases in total aged 15-35 were identified: 28,956 with a history of violent criminality (but not self-harm), 25,826 with a history of self-harm (but not violent criminality), and 3987 with dual harm history. Each case was matched by date of birth and gender to 20 controls who had not engaged in either behavior. We estimated exposure prevalence for cases vs. controls for each of the three behavior groups, and incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Experiencing 5 or more childhood adversities was more prevalent among individuals with dual harm history (19.3%; 95% CI 18.0, 20.8%) versus self-harm (10.9%; 10.5, 11.3%) and violence (11.4%; 11.0%, 11.8%) histories. The highest IRRs for dual harm were linked with parental unemployment (5.15; 95% CI 4.71, 5.64), parental hospitalization following self-harm (4.91; 4.40, 5.48) or assault (5.90; 5.07, 6.86), and parental violent criminality (6.11; 5.57, 6.70). Growing up in environments that are characterized by poverty, violence and substance misuse, and experiencing multiple adversities in childhood, appear to be especially strongly linked with elevated dual harm risk. These novel findings indicate potential etiologic pathways to dual harm.

Subject Areas

self-harm; dual harm; violence; childhood adversity; substance misuse

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.