Preprint Review Version 3 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles

Version 1 : Received: 26 September 2020 / Approved: 26 September 2020 / Online: 26 September 2020 (17:11:10 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 20 November 2020 / Approved: 24 November 2020 / Online: 24 November 2020 (09:59:07 CET)
Version 3 : Received: 4 December 2020 / Approved: 7 December 2020 / Online: 7 December 2020 (10:53:52 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Dulaud, P.; Di Loreto, I.; Mottet, D. Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9350. Dulaud, P.; Di Loreto, I.; Mottet, D. Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9350.

Abstract

Since the emergence of the quantified self movement, users aim at health behavior change, but only those who are sufficiently motivated and competent with the tools will succeed. Our literature review shows that theoretical models for quantified self exist but they are too abstract to guide the design of effective user support systems. Here, we propose principles linking theory and implementation to arrive at a hierarchical model for an adaptable and personalized self-quantification system for physical activity support. We show that such a modeling approach should include a multi-factors user model (activity, context, personality, motivation), a hierarchy of multiple time scales (week, day, hour), and a multi-criteria decision analysis (user activity preference, user measured activity, external parameters). This theoretical groundwork, which should facilitate the design of more effective solutions, has now to be validated by further empirical research.

Keywords

quantified self; health; physical activity; behavior change; model; support system; persuasive design; user centered design

Subject

Computer Science and Mathematics, Mathematical and Computational Biology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 7 December 2020
Commenter: Paul Dulaud
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Version 3
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.