Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Discrepancy in Galaxy Rotation Curves

Version 1 : Received: 3 August 2019 / Approved: 5 August 2019 / Online: 5 August 2019 (05:08:42 CEST)

How to cite: Gomel, R.; Zimmerman, T. The Discrepancy in Galaxy Rotation Curves. Preprints 2019, 2019080046. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201908.0046.v1 Gomel, R.; Zimmerman, T. The Discrepancy in Galaxy Rotation Curves. Preprints 2019, 2019080046. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201908.0046.v1

Abstract

In this work we try a new approach for dealing with the discrepancy between observed galaxy rotation curves and theoretical predictions. This new approach does not involve any changes in the current fundamental laws of nature or the addition of dark halos. Rather, it is based on the following single assumption: the observed velocities presented in rotation curves are not given relative to the galaxies' local inertial frames. Another way of putting it down: fictitious forces, which arise in non-inertial frames, should be taken into account when constructing a theoretical rotation curve. It turns out that this single assumption is sufficient in order to establish a robust model for fitting rotation curves. Applying the new model on a sample of more than 30 galaxies provides very promising results.

Keywords

dark matter; reference frames; galaxies

Subject

Physical Sciences, Astronomy and Astrophysics

Comments (0)

Comment 1
Received: 22 February 2020
Commenter: Peter
The commenter has declared there is no conflict of interests.
Comment: Hello Roy and Tomer. Thanks for your fascinating paper. I wonder if the angular velocity you invoke relates to an idea developed by Kurt Godel from General Relativity but nowadays generally discarded: -
Matter everywhere rotates relative to the compass of inertia at twice the square root of pi times G times density.

I have obtained some interesting results by applying this to the entire universe and some mixed results by trying to apply it to galaxies.

Regards, Pete Carroll.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.