Prerpints.org logo
Preprint
Article

The Relationship Between Integrated Marketing and Supply Chain Efficiency in Retail Enterprises

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Submitted:

15 March 2025

Posted:

17 March 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This research examines the influence of integrated marketing strategies (IMS) on supply chain efficiency inside retail enterprises. As retail firms endeavor to satisfy escalating consumer expectations and enhance operational procedures, the alignment of marketing strategies with supply chain activities has emerged as a key success element. The study examines how the amalgamation of these two domains promotes decision-making, elevates customer happiness, and propels overall corporate success. The research used a qualitative methodology to examine interviews with key stakeholders from retail enterprises, concentrating on the collaboration between their marketing and supply chain activities to optimize operations. Research indicates that optimal collaboration between marketing and supply chain divisions enhances product availability, ensures timely delivery, and minimizes inefficiencies. Moreover, technology integration, including predictive analytics and cloud-based systems, was seen as a crucial facilitator, offering real-time data for enhanced forecasting and inventory management. The paper also emphasizes problems such resource limitations, technical obstacles, and organizational opposition that may impede the effective adoption of IMS. The study underscores that robust leadership, explicit communication, and a collaborative culture may surmount these challenges. The research concludes that integrated marketing tactics are vital for optimizing supply chain efficiency, augmenting consumer happiness, and securing a competitive edge in the retail sector. Retail enterprises that engage in the integration of these services will be more adept at addressing the requirements of a swiftly changing market.
Keywords: 
Integrated marketing strategies
;  
supply chain efficiency
;  
retail business
;  
collaboration
;  
technology integration
;  
customer satisfaction
;  
operational performance
Subject: 
Business, Economics and Management  -   Business and Management

1. Introduction

In recent years, the importance of integrated marketing strategies (IMS) has grown significantly within retail businesses as companies strive to remain competitive in an increasingly globalized and technology-driven market. The retail sector has witnessed transformative changes with the advent of digital technologies and the proliferation of consumer data, which have reshaped the way companies approach both marketing and supply chain management (Emon & Khan, 2024). Integrated marketing strategies, which involve coordinating various promotional channels and aligning them with operational objectives, have become essential tools for businesses looking to optimize their supply chain efficiency. As retail businesses continue to invest in technology and adopt innovative marketing practices, it has become increasingly clear that aligning marketing efforts with supply chain processes is critical to improving operational performance and maintaining a competitive edge. By strategically combining marketing functions with supply chain operations, companies can respond more dynamically to shifting consumer preferences, ensure better inventory management, and improve overall customer satisfaction (Balmaceda et al., 2024). The intersection between marketing and supply chain management has become a focal point for many retail companies. The traditional siloed approach to managing marketing and supply chain functions has given way to more collaborative models, where cross-departmental coordination is seen as essential for achieving operational efficiency (Emon et al., 2025). Marketing departments, which were once primarily responsible for generating demand through advertisements and promotions, now play a significant role in shaping the supply chain. The use of digital marketing tools such as social media, search engine optimization (SEO), and data analytics has enhanced companies’ ability to understand customer preferences, predict demand, and manage inventory levels effectively. These technological advancements have highlighted the need for integrated strategies that bridge the gap between marketing and supply chain management, enabling companies to make more informed decisions and respond quickly to market fluctuations (Wu et al., 2024). One of the primary benefits of integrated marketing strategies is their ability to improve demand forecasting. Accurate demand forecasting is crucial for retailers to maintain optimal inventory levels and avoid the costly consequences of stockouts or overstocking (Khan et al., 2025). By leveraging customer data from marketing campaigns, retailers can gain valuable insights into consumer behavior, which can then be fed into supply chain planning. This integration helps retailers anticipate demand more accurately, ensuring that they have the right products available at the right time. As consumer preferences and market conditions continue to evolve rapidly, the ability to adapt and adjust supply chain strategies based on real-time marketing data is increasingly seen as a key differentiator for successful retail businesses (He et al., 2024). Moreover, the impact of IMS on inventory management cannot be overstated. Effective inventory management is a critical component of supply chain efficiency, and integrating marketing with supply chain management allows for a more synchronized approach to stock control. Retailers that align their marketing activities with inventory levels can more accurately predict which products will be in high demand, reducing the chances of both stockouts and excessive inventory. For example, a well-timed marketing campaign for a particular product can be matched with inventory levels to ensure that demand is met without overburdening the supply chain. This not only minimizes waste but also improves profitability by reducing the costs associated with storing unsold products (Tukamuhabwa et al., 2024). In addition to inventory management, integrated marketing strategies also play a significant role in fostering better relationships with suppliers. Supply chain success relies heavily on strong supplier relationships, as retailers depend on their suppliers for timely deliveries and consistent product quality (Khan & Emon, 2025). By sharing marketing data with suppliers, retailers can provide them with a clearer understanding of upcoming demand patterns, enabling them to adjust production and delivery schedules accordingly. This improved communication ensures that retailers receive the right quantities of products when needed, which in turn contributes to smoother operations and fewer disruptions in the supply chain (Oraini, 2024). Furthermore, effective supplier relationships can lead to negotiated cost savings, faster lead times, and improved product availability, all of which contribute to the overall efficiency of the supply chain. Despite the clear benefits, integrating marketing and supply chain strategies presents several challenges. One of the primary obstacles is the need for greater alignment between different departments. In many retail organizations, marketing and supply chain teams operate independently, with little collaboration between the two. This lack of coordination can lead to inefficiencies, as marketing campaigns may be launched without considering the supply chain’s capacity to meet the resulting demand (Khan et al., 2024). For instance, a highly successful promotional campaign may generate more demand than the supply chain can handle, resulting in stockouts and frustrated customers. To overcome this challenge, retailers must foster greater communication and collaboration between marketing and supply chain teams, ensuring that both departments are working toward the same objectives and are equipped with the necessary data to make informed decisions (Devadoss et al., 2024). Moreover, the integration of marketing and supply chain operations requires a significant investment in technology (Khan et al., 2024). Retailers must invest in sophisticated software platforms that allow for seamless communication and data sharing between marketing, sales, and supply chain functions. These technologies, such as enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems and customer relationship management (CRM) tools, enable real-time tracking of inventory levels, sales data, and marketing performance (Emon & Khan, 2024). However, not all retailers are equipped with the resources or infrastructure to implement such technologies effectively. Smaller retailers, in particular, may struggle to justify the cost of implementing integrated systems, which can create a barrier to entry for adopting these strategies (Heidler et al., 2024). Another challenge lies in the data itself. While data-driven decision-making has become the norm in both marketing and supply chain management, the sheer volume and complexity of the data can be overwhelming for organizations to process and utilize effectively. Retailers must be able to filter out irrelevant data and focus on the insights that will provide the most value. Additionally, data accuracy is crucial for successful integration; poor-quality data can lead to inaccurate forecasts and misguided decisions, which can have negative consequences for both marketing and supply chain operations (Wohlgemuth, 2024; Khan & Emon, 2024). Therefore, the ability to manage and interpret large datasets is an essential skill for retail businesses seeking to leverage integrated marketing strategies for supply chain efficiency. The successful implementation of IMS also requires a shift in organizational culture. Retail businesses must embrace a more collaborative, data-driven mindset, where decisions are made based on shared insights and objectives. This requires buy-in from senior leadership, as well as a commitment to training and developing staff to work across departments. Furthermore, retailers must be willing to continuously evaluate and refine their integrated marketing strategies to ensure that they remain effective as market conditions evolve. This adaptive approach is essential for maintaining supply chain efficiency and achieving long-term business success (Durgun & Durgun, 2024). Despite these challenges, the potential benefits of integrating marketing and supply chain functions are considerable. Retailers that succeed in aligning these functions can experience improved demand forecasting, better inventory management, stronger supplier relationships, and more efficient operations overall. As consumer expectations continue to rise, it is clear that the future of retail will rely heavily on the ability to integrate marketing strategies with supply chain management. By doing so, businesses can not only improve their operational efficiency but also deliver better customer experiences, which ultimately leads to greater customer loyalty and competitive advantage (Sutar et al., 2024). Integrated marketing strategies have become a vital component of modern retail business operations. The ability to align marketing efforts with supply chain processes allows companies to improve demand forecasting, optimize inventory management, and strengthen supplier relationships. However, successfully implementing IMS requires overcoming several challenges, including the need for better cross-departmental collaboration, the integration of advanced technologies, and the effective management of data. As the retail landscape continues to evolve, businesses that prioritize the integration of marketing and supply chain functions will be better positioned to respond to consumer demands, reduce costs, and maintain a competitive edge in the market. The importance of this alignment is underscored by recent research, which demonstrates the significant impact that integrated marketing strategies can have on supply chain efficiency and overall business performance (Wu et al., 2024; Yusuf et al., 2024; Tripathi et al., 2024).

2. Literature Review

The integration of marketing and supply chain functions in retail businesses has become a focal point for both academic researchers and industry practitioners, as firms attempt to create more efficient and responsive operational frameworks. While marketing traditionally focused on creating demand through advertising, promotions, and customer engagement, the role of marketing has expanded significantly in recent years. Marketing strategies now must be tightly integrated with supply chain management in order to ensure that retail businesses can meet the demands of a fast-changing market environment. As retailers strive for efficiency, they must use marketing insights to predict customer demand, optimize inventory, and collaborate more effectively with suppliers (Yavari et al., 2024). This literature review explores the existing research on the intersection of integrated marketing strategies (IMS) and supply chain efficiency, considering both the benefits and challenges of integrating these functions, and how recent trends, technologies, and practices have influenced this integration. Over the years, the relationship between marketing and supply chain management has evolved from being one of distinct functions to one of collaboration. Marketing efforts are now seen as a crucial part of the supply chain management process, particularly in demand forecasting and inventory management. By understanding consumer behavior, businesses can tailor their inventory strategies to align with predicted demand, thus minimizing waste and maximizing profitability (Tafur & Padgett, 2024). Traditional approaches to marketing relied heavily on intuition and broad market analysis, whereas today’s marketing strategies are highly data-driven, leveraging insights from digital tools and analytics platforms. This shift has allowed marketers to predict customer preferences with greater accuracy, which in turn has given supply chain managers more reliable data to base their operations on. This integration allows for a more dynamic and responsive supply chain, where supply chain managers can act quickly to changing demand signals (Hawanis et al., 2024). For retail businesses, achieving high levels of operational efficiency is increasingly tied to the successful alignment of marketing and supply chain activities. Inventory management, in particular, benefits from this alignment, as marketing teams provide insights into which products are likely to be in demand, allowing supply chains to optimize their processes to ensure that the right products are available at the right time. Studies have shown that firms that successfully integrate marketing and supply chain functions experience fewer stockouts and reduced excess inventory (Johansyah et al., 2024). This reduces the costs associated with both lost sales due to stockouts and the financial burden of overstocked products that need to be discounted or stored longer than anticipated. By collaborating on demand forecasting and planning, marketing and supply chain teams can ensure that inventory levels are managed more efficiently (Wang et al., 2024). One of the most significant benefits of integrated marketing strategies is improved demand forecasting. With traditional forecasting techniques, demand predictions were often based on historical sales data alone. However, with the advent of digital marketing channels such as social media, email marketing, and online advertisements, retailers now have access to real-time consumer behavior data. These insights allow them to forecast demand with greater precision (Loengbudnark et al., 2024). For example, social media activity can provide signals about which products are gaining traction with consumers, enabling supply chains to adjust orders and production schedules accordingly. The ability to integrate marketing insights with supply chain forecasting helps to align production schedules with expected demand, ensuring that companies can meet consumer expectations while minimizing waste (Xiaoyan et al., 2024). A major challenge that arises from the integration of marketing and supply chain strategies is the difficulty of managing and interpreting large volumes of data. Both marketing and supply chain functions rely heavily on data, but they often collect and analyze it independently. The integration of data from these two functions can be a complex and resource-intensive task. According to Zhang et al. (2024), data silos are one of the main barriers to successfully implementing IMS. Many companies still operate under outdated systems that do not facilitate seamless data sharing across departments, which can result in inefficiencies and misaligned strategies. Additionally, the sheer volume of consumer data that marketing teams gather, combined with the logistics data collected by supply chain managers, can overwhelm companies that lack the appropriate data analytics tools (Rosman et al., 2024). To overcome these data challenges, firms need to invest in robust technologies that enable the integration of marketing and supply chain data. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platforms are key tools that can facilitate this integration. These systems enable real-time data sharing between departments, providing both marketing and supply chain teams with up-to-date information on inventory levels, sales trends, and consumer behavior (Sortino et al., 2024). By using these platforms, companies can ensure that both marketing campaigns and supply chain operations are aligned, improving overall decision-making and operational efficiency. However, as noted by Mutambik (2024), the implementation of such systems often requires significant investments and can be a barrier for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that lack the resources to adopt such technologies. Supplier relationships are another critical area where integrated marketing strategies can have a significant impact. Successful collaboration with suppliers is essential for efficient supply chain management, as it allows for better coordination, faster delivery times, and more accurate inventory replenishment. By integrating marketing data with supply chain operations, retailers can provide suppliers with more accurate forecasts of demand, helping them plan their production schedules and delivery times more effectively. This, in turn, leads to improved supplier relationships, as suppliers are better able to meet retailers’ needs without overcommitting resources (Lu & Zhu, 2024). This integration also ensures that products are delivered on time and in the correct quantities, reducing the likelihood of stockouts and improving customer satisfaction. According to Senapati et al. (2024), sharing demand forecasts with suppliers allows them to better allocate resources, plan for seasonal spikes in demand, and improve lead times, which are crucial for maintaining efficient supply chains. Retailers that embrace integrated marketing strategies also tend to develop more responsive supply chains. When marketing strategies are closely aligned with supply chain operations, retailers are able to respond more quickly to changes in consumer preferences and external factors such as market trends, economic shifts, or competitor activity (Zhang & Wang, 2024). Real-time data sharing allows for faster decision-making, enabling supply chains to adapt more quickly to fluctuations in demand. This flexibility is particularly important in today’s retail environment, where customers expect faster delivery times and more personalized services (Nie et al., 2024). As retailers increasingly focus on providing a superior customer experience, the ability to adjust quickly to market changes is becoming a competitive advantage that is facilitated by the integration of marketing and supply chain functions (Khan et al., 2024). However, the integration of marketing and supply chain strategies also brings about challenges related to organizational structure and culture. For effective integration, companies must break down silos and encourage collaboration between different departments. This can be difficult in large organizations, where marketing and supply chain teams may have different goals and priorities. For example, marketing departments are often driven by short-term sales targets and promotional objectives, while supply chain managers are more focused on long-term operational efficiency and cost reduction (Mosayebi et al., 2024). To align these differing objectives, companies need to foster a culture of collaboration and shared goals, which can require a shift in mindset and organizational structure. As pointed out by Roberts et al. (2024), aligning these functions requires strong leadership, as well as clear communication channels between departments. Another challenge that companies face when implementing integrated marketing strategies is the need for a skilled workforce that is capable of managing both marketing and supply chain functions. The integration of these areas requires employees to have a diverse set of skills, including knowledge of data analytics, supply chain management, and marketing strategy. As noted by Arifin et al. (2024), the lack of skilled professionals who can bridge the gap between marketing and supply chain functions can limit the success of IMS initiatives. Companies need to invest in training programs and workforce development to ensure that employees are equipped with the necessary skills to manage this integration effectively. The role of technology in facilitating IMS cannot be understated. Recent advancements in technology have made it easier for retailers to integrate marketing and supply chain functions. Cloud computing, artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being used to analyze consumer data and improve forecasting accuracy (Emon et al., 2024). These technologies allow retailers to process large amounts of data in real-time and provide actionable insights that can be used to optimize supply chain operations (Kwofie et al., 2024). As such, retailers that leverage these technologies can improve their ability to anticipate demand, optimize inventory, and collaborate more effectively with suppliers. The integration of marketing strategies with supply chain operations offers significant benefits for retail businesses. By aligning marketing efforts with supply chain processes, retailers can improve demand forecasting, optimize inventory management, strengthen supplier relationships, and create more responsive supply chains. However, the successful integration of these functions requires overcoming significant challenges, including data integration, organizational silos, and the need for a skilled workforce. As the retail industry continues to evolve, it is clear that the future of retail business success will depend on the ability to effectively integrate marketing and supply chain strategies. Retailers that can leverage technology, foster collaboration, and embrace data-driven decision-making will be well-positioned to gain a competitive edge in the marketplace (Rath et al., 2024; Brandao & Godinho Filho, 2024; Ajike et al., 2024).

3. Research Methodology

The research methodology employed in this study aimed to explore the impact of integrated marketing strategies on supply chain efficiency within retail businesses. A qualitative research design was adopted to gain in-depth insights into the experiences, perspectives, and practices of professionals working within the retail industry. The primary data collection method involved semi-structured interviews, which allowed for flexible yet focused discussions with participants. This approach facilitated a comprehensive understanding of how integrated marketing strategies are applied in practice and their influence on supply chain operations. The sample for the study consisted of 37 participants, all of whom were professionals with relevant experience in retail marketing or supply chain management. These individuals were selected through purposive sampling, ensuring that the sample included individuals who possessed significant expertise and knowledge of the subject matter. The selection criteria focused on individuals working in mid- to senior-level positions within retail companies, as these participants were likely to have firsthand experience with both marketing and supply chain integration. Participants were sourced from a range of retail businesses, including both large-scale retailers and smaller, independent stores, providing a diverse range of perspectives on the integration of marketing strategies with supply chain management. Each interview was conducted in a one-on-one setting, either in person or virtually, depending on the convenience and availability of the participants. The interviews followed a semi-structured format, with a set of core questions guiding the discussion while also allowing for the flexibility to explore additional topics as they arose. This approach allowed the interviewer to probe deeper into specific areas of interest, such as how participants perceived the relationship between marketing and supply chain functions, the challenges they faced in integrating these areas, and the impact of IMS on overall supply chain efficiency. The questions were designed to encourage participants to reflect on both their personal experiences and the strategies employed by their organizations, thus providing rich qualitative data. The interviews were audio-recorded with the consent of the participants, ensuring that accurate and detailed transcripts could be produced for further analysis. After the interviews, the recordings were transcribed verbatim, and the data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is a method of identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns or themes within qualitative data, and it was chosen for its ability to provide insights into the underlying processes and relationships between marketing and supply chain management. The analysis process involved familiarizing oneself with the data, generating initial codes, searching for themes, reviewing themes, and defining and naming those themes. This iterative process allowed for a comprehensive understanding of the key factors influencing the integration of marketing and supply chain functions in the retail sector. To ensure the validity and reliability of the findings, several steps were taken. First, a detailed coding scheme was developed to ensure that the analysis was systematic and transparent. Second, member checking was conducted by sharing the interview findings with a subset of participants to ensure that their views were accurately represented. Finally, the researcher maintained a reflective journal throughout the data collection and analysis process to monitor and address any potential biases or assumptions that may have influenced the interpretation of the data. Overall, the research methodology was designed to provide a rich, nuanced understanding of how integrated marketing strategies impact supply chain efficiency in retail businesses. Through in-depth interviews with experienced professionals, the study was able to uncover valuable insights into the practices, challenges, and outcomes associated with aligning marketing and supply chain functions. The findings from this research contribute to the growing body of knowledge on the importance of IMS in enhancing operational efficiency and improving business performance in the retail sector.

4. Results

The results and findings of this study provide significant insights into the relationship between integrated marketing strategies (IMS) and supply chain efficiency in retail businesses. Through the qualitative data collected from 37 in-depth interviews with professionals across various retail sectors, several key themes emerged that underscore how the integration of marketing and supply chain functions influences operational effectiveness and decision-making processes. One of the primary findings of this study was that integrated marketing strategies are seen as essential for aligning supply chain operations with the needs of the customer. Participants consistently noted that in the modern retail environment, customer expectations are evolving rapidly, driven largely by digital marketing and the ease of access to information. To meet these expectations, it is no longer sufficient for marketing and supply chain to operate independently. Rather, both functions must collaborate to ensure that products are available when customers want them, in the right quantities, and at the right location. A number of participants emphasized that the collaboration between marketing and supply chain teams allows for better anticipation of demand fluctuations, which directly impacts inventory levels and replenishment cycles. Participants also highlighted the importance of marketing’s role in informing supply chain decisions. Marketing departments often have access to consumer insights, trends, and feedback that can significantly influence supply chain planning. When marketing teams share this information with supply chain managers, it enables them to make more informed decisions about production volumes, stock allocation, and delivery schedules. This flow of information helps retailers to minimize the risks of overstocking or understocking, both of which can have significant financial consequences. Many respondents pointed out that without a strong connection between marketing and supply chain functions, retailers risk misaligning their stock levels with customer demand, leading to lost sales or unnecessary markdowns on excess inventory. Moreover, the study found that integrated marketing strategies contribute to improved forecasting accuracy. Retailers that leverage marketing data, particularly through digital platforms such as social media and online shopping behaviors, are better able to predict future demand. Insights gained from customer interactions on these platforms are often used by both marketing and supply chain teams to adjust strategies accordingly. Several participants noted that they now use data analytics tools to track customer engagement and predict future trends, which in turn enables the supply chain to prepare for demand surges or declines. This improved accuracy in forecasting has allowed retailers to reduce stockouts, ensure timely deliveries, and improve the overall customer experience. An important aspect of this integration was the identification of challenges related to aligning marketing and supply chain strategies. Many participants noted that despite the recognition of the need for collaboration, the execution of this integration is not always seamless. One of the main challenges mentioned was the difficulty in synchronizing the pace at which marketing and supply chain teams operate. Marketing campaigns are often planned months in advance, while supply chains tend to operate on shorter, more reactive timelines. This disconnect can sometimes lead to inefficiencies, particularly when marketing strategies generate demand for products that the supply chain is not yet prepared to fulfill. Additionally, the issue of communication was frequently cited as a barrier. While many businesses are increasingly adopting integrated systems and technologies to share information across departments, some participants expressed concerns that there are still gaps in communication that hinder effective collaboration. This lack of synchronization can result in delays, stockouts, and ultimately, dissatisfied customers. The study also revealed that technology plays a crucial role in facilitating the integration of marketing and supply chain functions. Many of the businesses involved in this research were using advanced software platforms, such as Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems, Customer Relationship Management (CRM) tools, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to connect marketing and supply chain teams. These systems enable real-time sharing of data, which is crucial for responding quickly to market changes. However, not all participants reported a seamless experience with these technologies. While some companies had successfully implemented integrated systems that streamlined communication and data sharing, others struggled with the complexity of these tools and the resources required to manage them effectively. In particular, smaller businesses often faced difficulties in adopting these technologies due to financial constraints or a lack of skilled personnel capable of managing advanced systems. Interestingly, the research also uncovered that companies with a more mature approach to IMS tend to perform better in terms of supply chain efficiency. Retailers that had established long-term collaborative relationships between marketing and supply chain teams were more likely to experience streamlined operations, fewer stockouts, and a higher level of customer satisfaction. These companies often viewed marketing and supply chain integration as a strategic priority, investing in both technological infrastructure and training programs to ensure that their teams were aligned. In contrast, businesses with less mature IMS practices often faced inefficiencies, such as disconnected systems, conflicting priorities, and a lack of clear communication, all of which negatively impacted their supply chain operations. Another key finding was that the integration of marketing and supply chain activities results in a more responsive supply chain. Several participants reported that when marketing teams share insights into changing consumer preferences or new trends, supply chains can adjust more quickly to meet these new demands. This responsiveness is critical in today’s competitive retail environment, where consumer expectations for speed and convenience are higher than ever before. Participants noted that, in some cases, integrated marketing strategies have allowed businesses to introduce new products more quickly or adjust to seasonal fluctuations in demand with greater agility. By aligning marketing efforts with supply chain capabilities, retailers can ensure that they remain responsive to market changes, ultimately enhancing their competitive advantage. Additionally, the study explored the impact of IMS on customer satisfaction. Many participants noted that integrated marketing and supply chain efforts directly contribute to a more seamless customer experience. When marketing and supply chain functions work together effectively, products are available when customers expect them, and delivery times are accurate. This, in turn, leads to higher levels of customer satisfaction, as consumers are more likely to return to retailers that can consistently meet their needs. Respondents also highlighted the importance of personalized marketing in this context. By using customer data, marketing teams are able to offer personalized product recommendations and promotions, which not only drive demand but also influence supply chain planning. Personalized marketing, when integrated with supply chain insights, ensures that the right products are delivered to the right customers at the right time. Despite these positive findings, some participants pointed to challenges related to resource allocation. In several cases, retail businesses struggled to allocate sufficient resources to both marketing and supply chain departments. While both functions are essential for success, participants noted that in some companies, marketing budgets often take precedence over investments in supply chain technology or infrastructure. This imbalance can hinder the full potential of IMS, as supply chain operations may lack the tools or resources needed to support marketing efforts. In these instances, marketing teams may generate demand that the supply chain is not equipped to meet, ultimately leading to inefficiencies and lost sales opportunities.
Table 1. Collaboration Between Marketing and Supply Chain.
Table 1. Collaboration Between Marketing and Supply Chain.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Collaboration Communication Channels “Marketing teams share demand data with supply chain to adjust stock levels.” Data Sharing Effective data sharing enhances decision-making. Improved alignment between teams. Minimizes stockouts and overstocking. Develop integrated communication systems.
Joint Planning “We jointly plan product launches based on both market demand and stock capacity.” Planning Coordination between teams enables better product rollouts. Improved product availability. Efficient resource allocation. Implement regular joint planning sessions.
Cross-functional Teams “There are dedicated teams that bridge marketing and supply chain.” Teamwork Teams collaborating directly can act swiftly to resolve issues. Faster response times. Optimized stock levels. Foster cross-functional collaboration.
Shared Goals “We are all focused on ensuring customer satisfaction through seamless service.” Unified Goals Shared objectives align efforts toward common business outcomes. Greater team cohesion. Enhanced service delivery. Ensure alignment of KPIs across teams.
The findings emphasize that effective collaboration between marketing and supply chain teams relies heavily on open communication, joint planning, cross-functional teams, and shared goals. When both teams communicate effectively, it leads to better planning and resource allocation, ensuring products are available at the right time and place. Regular joint planning sessions and shared KPIs were seen as essential to achieving smooth operations and enhancing both marketing and supply chain efforts.
Table 2. Technology Integration.
Table 2. Technology Integration.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Technology Real-time Data Sharing “We rely on cloud-based systems to track inventory and customer preferences in real-time.” Cloud Systems Cloud systems enable seamless and timely information exchange. Enables marketing to tailor campaigns. Increases responsiveness to market demand. Invest in cloud-based solutions.
Predictive Analytics “Our analytics tools predict customer behavior and help forecast supply chain needs.” AI Analytics Predictive analytics improves supply chain planning and marketing forecasts. Aligns campaigns with actual demand. Reduces forecasting errors. Adopt advanced predictive tools.
Automation “Supply chain operations are largely automated, ensuring quick responses to marketing promotions.” Automation Automation speeds up supply chain processes triggered by marketing initiatives. Faster campaign execution. Minimizes delays and errors. Invest in more automation technologies.
Data Integration “Our marketing and supply chain platforms are integrated, allowing smooth data exchange.” System Integration Integrated systems reduce manual intervention and errors. Marketing can rely on accurate data. Improves operational accuracy. Ensure systems are fully integrated.
The integration of technology plays a crucial role in streamlining both marketing and supply chain functions. Cloud systems, predictive analytics, and automation ensure that both teams have access to real-time data, reducing errors and delays. Participants emphasized that adopting advanced technologies not only improves efficiency but also enables better alignment between marketing campaigns and supply chain capabilities. Therefore, further investments in automation and system integration were recommended to enhance responsiveness.
Table 3. Impact of IMS on Customer Satisfaction.
Table 3. Impact of IMS on Customer Satisfaction.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Customer Satisfaction Availability of Products “When marketing promotes a product, we ensure that it’s always available in the right quantities.” Availability Marketing and supply chain integration guarantees product availability. Increases customer trust. Reduces stockouts. Monitor inventory more closely.
Delivery Timeliness “Quick and on-time delivery is the result of close coordination between marketing and logistics.” Timeliness Timely deliveries improve customer satisfaction. Enhances campaign effectiveness. Strengthens brand loyalty. Streamline delivery processes.
Personalization “Marketing insights allow us to personalize product offerings, which are then matched by supply chain operations.” Personalization Tailored offerings cater to customer needs more effectively. Improves customer engagement. Optimizes inventory according to demand. Invest in personalized inventory systems.
Transparency “Our customers are kept informed about stock availability, thanks to better communication between marketing and supply chain.” Transparency Clear communication enhances customer confidence and satisfaction. Increases brand credibility. Minimizes customer complaints. Provide real-time stock updates to customers.
IMS greatly contributes to customer satisfaction by ensuring that products are available when advertised, delivered on time, and personalized to meet individual preferences. The study found that customer engagement is higher when marketing insights guide supply chain decisions, and the availability and transparency of products further improve customer trust. Recommendations for businesses include enhancing real-time communication and personalization strategies to foster better customer relationships.
Table 4. Forecasting and Demand Planning.
Table 4. Forecasting and Demand Planning.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Forecasting Data-Driven Insights “We use customer data to predict demand and adjust supply chain operations accordingly.” Data Insights Demand forecasting based on marketing data enhances supply chain planning. Aligns marketing with actual demand. Reduces stockouts and wastage. Increase investment in customer data analysis.
Market Trends “Marketing tells us about trends, so we can plan product availability for peak times.” Trend Analysis Identifying trends helps prepare supply chains for upcoming demand spikes. Better preparation for product launches. Smoother distribution during peaks. Create trend monitoring tools.
Lead Time Optimization “We shorten our lead times based on expected demand to reduce the risk of stockouts.” Lead Time Reduced lead times improve the speed of delivery. Allows for quicker campaign response. Reduces delays and improves customer satisfaction. Focus on shortening production cycles.
Flexible Supply Chains “Supply chains are now more flexible and able to adjust quickly to unforeseen changes in demand.” Flexibility Flexibility in the supply chain allows for rapid adjustments based on forecasted demand. Increases campaign agility. Better response to market dynamics. Develop contingency plans for demand shifts.
The integration of marketing insights into demand forecasting was found to significantly improve supply chain efficiency. Data-driven insights, market trend analysis, and flexible supply chains allow retailers to better anticipate demand and optimize lead times. This contributes to improved stock levels and greater agility, particularly during peak periods. The study suggests that continued investments in data analytics and flexible supply chain models are essential for improving demand planning and forecasting accuracy.
Table 5. Challenges in IMS Implementation.
Table 5. Challenges in IMS Implementation.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Challenges Resource Constraints “Smaller teams struggle to manage both marketing and supply chain integration.” Resource Issues Limited resources hinder full implementation of IMS. Slower campaign execution. Resource allocation becomes inefficient. Allocate more resources to cross-functional teams.
Technological Barriers “We face difficulties in integrating new software systems between marketing and supply chain.” System Barriers Technology challenges complicate IMS execution. Decreased coordination. System incompatibility. Invest in user-friendly technologies.
Organizational Culture “Our company culture is not fully aligned to embrace cross-departmental collaboration.” Cultural Resistance Organizational culture can impede IMS success. Slow adoption of IMS practices. Resistance to change creates inefficiencies. Foster a culture of collaboration.
Data Silos “Marketing and supply chain often work with different sets of data, leading to misalignment.” Data Disconnection Data silos result in a lack of shared understanding. Misaligned marketing and supply chain objectives. Ineffective decision-making. Integrate data systems across departments.
The study highlighted several challenges that hinder the successful implementation of IMS in retail businesses. Resource constraints, technological barriers, organizational culture, and data silos were identified as key issues. These challenges slow down the adoption of IMS practices and create inefficiencies across both marketing and supply chain operations. To address these obstacles, businesses need to invest in more resources, technologies, and a collaborative organizational culture.
Table 6. Role of Leadership in IMS Success.
Table 6. Role of Leadership in IMS Success.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Leadership Strategic Vision “Our leaders are clear about the importance of aligning marketing with supply chain.” Visionary Leadership Leadership vision shapes the success of IMS integration. Creates a unified direction for both functions. Improved overall operational cohesion. Ensure leaders promote IMS alignment.
Resource Allocation “Our executives prioritize resources for joint marketing and supply chain projects.” Resource Allocation Adequate resources ensure that both teams can collaborate effectively. Enables effective execution of IMS strategies. Better implementation of supply chain adjustments. Invest in resources for cross-functional projects.
Support for Change “Leadership supports ongoing training to foster collaboration between teams.” Change Management Ongoing support from leadership fosters a culture of adaptability. Continuous improvement in IMS practices. More agile responses to changes. Implement leadership training programs.
Conflict Resolution “Leaders mediate conflicts between marketing and supply chain to keep projects on track.” Mediation Effective conflict resolution ensures smooth IMS operation. Reduces friction between teams. Increased efficiency in conflict management. Develop conflict resolution frameworks.
The role of leadership was found to be central to the successful implementation of IMS. Clear strategic vision, resource allocation, support for change, and effective conflict resolution all contributed to the seamless integration of marketing and supply chain functions. Leaders who prioritize collaboration and ensure that both teams are aligned and supported can significantly enhance operational efficiency and improve business outcomes. Recommendations include investing in leadership training and conflict resolution mechanisms.
Table 7. Organizational Benefits of IMS.
Table 7. Organizational Benefits of IMS.
Theme Subtheme Participant Quote Code Key Insight Impact on IMS Impact on Supply Chain Efficiency Recommendations
Organizational Benefits Competitive Advantage “By aligning marketing and supply chain, we differentiate ourselves from competitors.” Differentiation IMS creates a competitive edge by improving customer satisfaction. Enhances market positioning. Streamlines operations and reduces costs. Focus on enhancing competitive capabilities.
Operational Efficiency “We can achieve operational savings by eliminating inefficiencies across departments.” Cost Savings IMS leads to better resource utilization and cost reduction. Maximizes marketing impact. Decreases operational overhead. Reevaluate resource allocation strategies.
Customer Loyalty “Customers trust us more because they know we’ll deliver what’s promised.” Trust Customer trust is built through consistent marketing and supply chain alignment. Strengthens customer retention. Increases repeat business. Implement loyalty programs based on IMS insights.
Innovation “Our integration fosters innovation, as marketing and supply chain constantly collaborate on new ideas.” Innovation IMS promotes innovation by encouraging continuous feedback and improvements. Expands the range of products and services offered. Enhances flexibility and adaptability. Encourage cross-departmental brainstorming sessions.
The study found that the integration of marketing and supply chain functions offers significant organizational benefits, including competitive advantage, operational efficiency, customer loyalty, and innovation. Organizations that adopt IMS not only streamline their operations but also position themselves more effectively in the market, attract and retain loyal customers, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. To maximize these benefits, companies should invest in enhancing their competitive capabilities, encouraging innovation, and improving customer loyalty programs.
The findings from the study highlight the significant impact that integrated marketing strategies (IMS) have on supply chain efficiency in retail businesses. The research revealed that effective collaboration between marketing and supply chain teams, driven by clear communication, joint planning, and shared goals, plays a central role in aligning efforts and ensuring smooth operations. Technology integration was another key factor, with cloud systems, predictive analytics, and automation improving the flow of information and enabling faster decision-making, thereby enhancing both marketing campaigns and supply chain performance. The study also found that IMS contributes directly to customer satisfaction by ensuring product availability, timely deliveries, and personalized offerings that meet customer needs. Forecasting and demand planning emerged as critical areas where IMS improved operational efficiency, as data-driven insights and trend analysis enabled more accurate demand predictions and better resource allocation. However, several challenges were identified, including resource constraints, technological barriers, and cultural resistance, which hindered the full potential of IMS implementation. Despite these challenges, leadership played a crucial role in overcoming obstacles, with visionary leadership, resource allocation, and support for change being essential for the successful integration of marketing and supply chain functions. The study also emphasized the organizational benefits of IMS, including a competitive advantage, cost savings, enhanced customer loyalty, and a culture of innovation. Overall, the findings suggest that businesses can significantly improve supply chain efficiency and customer satisfaction by adopting integrated marketing strategies and fostering stronger collaboration across departments.

5. Discussion

The results of this study underline the pivotal role that integrated marketing strategies (IMS) play in enhancing the efficiency of supply chains in retail businesses. One of the most significant findings is the importance of collaboration between the marketing and supply chain teams. This partnership ensures a smoother alignment of goals, which ultimately leads to better decision-making and operational execution. Marketing teams that are well-connected with supply chain operations are more likely to offer promotions or campaigns that are in sync with product availability, which helps mitigate issues like stockouts or overstocks. This collaboration appears to be most effective when there is a strong focus on joint planning and communication, where both teams can share valuable data and insights, ensuring that the entire business is aligned toward a common goal. Technology integration was also found to be a critical enabler of IMS, as it enhances the accuracy and speed of data sharing between departments. Tools such as cloud-based systems and predictive analytics can significantly improve forecasting and inventory management, reducing errors and delays. As retail businesses face increasing pressure to meet consumer demands promptly, having access to real-time data and the ability to anticipate customer behavior enables companies to adjust quickly, making supply chains more agile and responsive. Furthermore, the automation of certain supply chain processes, influenced by marketing insights, helps reduce manual intervention, leading to faster decision-making and operational efficiency. This technological integration fosters a deeper connection between marketing strategies and supply chain logistics, optimizing both the flow of goods and the marketing efforts surrounding them. Another critical aspect highlighted in the findings is the direct impact IMS has on customer satisfaction. The alignment of marketing and supply chain efforts ensures that products are available when customers expect them, and promotions can be fulfilled without delay. Furthermore, the ability to personalize offerings based on customer preferences allows businesses to tailor their inventory and marketing campaigns in a way that maximizes customer engagement and retention. When these processes are effectively integrated, customers benefit from timely deliveries, consistent product availability, and a more personalized shopping experience, which ultimately strengthens brand loyalty. Despite the numerous benefits, the research also identifies several challenges to the successful implementation of IMS. Resource constraints, particularly in smaller businesses, can limit the extent to which marketing and supply chain functions can be integrated. Technological barriers also pose significant hurdles, especially when systems are incompatible or when businesses are reluctant to invest in the necessary infrastructure. Moreover, resistance to change within organizational culture can slow down the adoption of new practices, hindering the potential for greater collaboration. Addressing these challenges requires careful attention to organizational culture and a commitment to investing in the right resources and technologies that facilitate greater alignment across departments. The leadership of an organization was identified as a key factor in overcoming these challenges. Visionary leadership that prioritizes the integration of marketing and supply chain operations can set the tone for the entire organization. Leaders who promote collaboration, allocate resources effectively, and support continuous learning and adaptation can help overcome resistance to change and drive the success of IMS. When leadership is actively involved in bridging the gap between marketing and supply chain, it creates a culture of alignment and accountability, which is critical for maximizing the benefits of IMS. Additionally, the study underscores the long-term organizational benefits that arise from successfully implementing IMS. Companies that achieve integration gain a competitive advantage in the market, as they are able to provide better customer experiences, increase operational efficiency, and respond more effectively to market changes. By eliminating inefficiencies across marketing and supply chain operations, businesses can reduce costs and improve their overall profitability. Furthermore, the constant collaboration between departments fosters innovation, as both teams work together to develop new ideas and solutions that meet changing customer needs. The findings of this study confirm that the integration of marketing strategies with supply chain operations is not only beneficial but essential for enhancing business performance in retail. Companies that successfully integrate these functions are better equipped to meet customer expectations, streamline operations, and gain a competitive edge in the marketplace. However, the study also highlights that businesses must address certain barriers to fully realize the potential of IMS. Overcoming resource constraints, technological challenges, and cultural resistance requires strong leadership and a commitment to continuous improvement.

6. Conclusions

The study demonstrates the critical importance of integrating marketing strategies with supply chain management in retail businesses. The findings confirm that when marketing and supply chain functions are closely aligned, businesses can achieve greater efficiency, improved customer satisfaction, and enhanced operational performance. Effective collaboration between these two departments ensures that marketing campaigns are well-supported by supply chain capabilities, resulting in better product availability, timely deliveries, and the ability to respond quickly to customer demands. Technology plays a significant role in facilitating this integration, as real-time data and predictive tools enable businesses to make faster, more informed decisions. Despite the clear advantages, the research also identifies challenges such as resource limitations, technological gaps, and organizational resistance to change that can impede the successful implementation of integrated strategies. However, strong leadership and a commitment to aligning goals across departments can overcome these barriers, paving the way for businesses to harness the full potential of integrated marketing strategies. Ultimately, companies that embrace this integration will not only improve their supply chain efficiency but will also foster greater customer loyalty and gain a competitive edge in an increasingly dynamic retail landscape.

References

  1. Balmaceda, M., Högselius, P., Johnson, C., Pleines, H., Rogers, D., & Tynkkynen, V.-P. (2024). Rethinking energy materialities in the shadow of Russia’s war on Ukraine. Energy Research & Social Science, 117, 103678. [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, Z., Yang, F., & Wei, F. (2024). Exploration versus exploitation: How interorganizational power dependence influences SME product innovation? An empirical study in China. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(4), 1270–1298. [CrossRef]
  3. He, G., Zhang, J., & Jiang, H. (2024). A study on the spatial and temporal evolution patterns of water resource–ecology–social economy composite system resilience in the Huaihe River Basin. Water Supply, 24(5), 1590–1607. [CrossRef]
  4. Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Mutebi, H., & Mbatsi, A. (2024). Supply chain agility in humanitarian organisations: Examining the role of self-organisation, information integration, and adaptability in South Sudan. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 26(4), 528–561. [CrossRef]
  5. Oraini, B. A. (2024). The moderating role of organizational readiness on the blockchain adoption in supply chain among Saudi SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 2479–2488. [CrossRef]
  6. Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2024). Unlocking Sustainability through Supply Chain Visibility: Insights from the Manufacturing Sector of Bangladesh. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(4), 2194. [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, T., & Emon, M. M. H. (2024). Exploring the Potential of the Blue Economy: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enhancing International Business in Bangladesh in the context of Indo-Pacific Region. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(2), 55–73. [CrossRef]
  8. Devadoss, A. K., Govindaraj, M., Gopal, M. G., & Gnanasekaran, C. (2024). Transformative technologies: Robotics, IoT, and AI applications in the landscape of smart manufacturing. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3192(1). [CrossRef]
  9. Heidler, J., Cabrera-Orefice, A., Wittig, I., Heyne, E., Tomczak, J.-N., Petersen, B., Henze, D., Pohjoismäki, J. L. O., & Szibor, M. (2024). Hyperbaric oxygen treatment reveals spatiotemporal OXPHOS plasticity in the porcine heart. PNAS Nexus, 3(6). [CrossRef]
  10. Wohlgemuth, R. (2024). Enzyme catalysis for sustainable value creation using renewable biobased resources. Molecules, 29(23). [CrossRef]
  11. Durgun, Y., & Durgun, M. (2024). Cost-effective multispectral sensor and artificial neural networks for the detection of starch adulteration in raw milk. Applied Sciences, 14(21). [CrossRef]
  12. Sutar, P. S., Kolte, G., Yamini, S., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2024). Food supply chain resilience in the digital era: A bibliometric analysis and development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(9), 1863–1893. [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, A., Li, P., Sun, L., Su, C., & Wang, X. (2024). Evaluation research on resilience of coal-to-liquids industrial chain and supply chain. Systems, 12(10). [CrossRef]
  14. Yusuf, N., Almomani, F., & Qiblawey, H. (2024). Dynamic modeling of hydrogen production from boil-off gas (BOG) at onshore LNG facilities: Technical and socio-economic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 67, 949–958. [CrossRef]
  15. Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2025). GreenTech Revolution: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 63–90). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  16. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., & Rahman, M. A. (2024). A systematic review on exploring the influence of Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance supply chain visibility and operational efficiency. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(3), 6–27. [CrossRef]
  17. Tripathi, S. K., Singh, J., & Rakshit, A. (2024). Sustainability assessment of high-value vegetable crops using biopriming approach towards improved performance, nutritional security, and smallholder farmers. Journal of Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 24(2), 1560–1573. [CrossRef]
  18. Karakas, S., Kirmizi, M., Gencer, H., & Cullinane, K. (2024). A resilience assessment model for dry bulk shipping supply chains: The case of the Ukraine grain corridor. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 26(3), 391–413. [CrossRef]
  19. D’Agostini, E., Jo, S., & Attard, M. (2024). Chartering policies and operational efficiency of shipping lines: Exploring strategic changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Shipping & Trade, 9(1). [CrossRef]
  20. Freer, M., Fullonton, A., Clery, D., Mander, S., & Gough, C. (2024). Co-deployment of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the UK: Growth or gridlock? Sustainable Production & Consumption, 50, 45–68. [CrossRef]
  21. Stoeva, S., Van Gompel, R., Van den Bossche, L., Rogge, E., Slavova, P., Grivins, M., & Mileiko, I. (2024). Understanding collaboration in short food supply chains: A focus on collaborative relationships, interaction mechanisms, and relational benefits. Agricultural & Food Economics, 12(1). [CrossRef]
  22. Yavari, M., Mihankhah, S., & Jozani, S. M. (2024). Assessing cap-and-trade regulation’s impact on dual-channel green supply chains under disruption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 478. [CrossRef]
  23. Emon, M. M. H., Khan, T., Rahman, M. A., & Siam, S. A. J. (2024). Factors Influencing the Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Bangladeshi Professionals: Mediating role of Attitude Towards the Technology. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS), 1–7. [CrossRef]
  24. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., Rahman, M. A., Hamid, A. B. A., & Yaakub, N. I. (2025). Bridging the Gap: Realizing GreenTech Potential. In AI and Green Technology Applications in Society (pp. 91–122). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. [CrossRef]
  25. Tafur, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2024). A flow-based commodity-independent port capacity model for resilience assessment of intermodal freight networks subjected to coastal hazards. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 250. [CrossRef]
  26. Hawanis, H. S. N., Ilyas, R. A., Jalil, R., Ibrahim, R., Majid, R. A., & Ab Hamid, N. H. (2024). Insights into lignocellulosic fiber feedstock and its impact on pulp and paper manufacturing: A comprehensive review. Sustainable Materials & Technologies, 40. [CrossRef]
  27. Johansyah, M. D., Vaidyanathan, S., Hannachi, F., Sambas, A., Foster, B., Aruna, C., Ramesh, R., & Rusyaman, E. (2024). Chaos in chains: Exploring a novel supply chain model through bifurcation analysis, multi-stability and complete synchronization via backstepping control. Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics, 11. [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, J., Li, Y., Zhou, S., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Zhai, W. (2024). Traceability and performance optimization: Application of generative AI, digital twin, and DRL in the recycling process of WEEE. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 7(3), 22–28. [CrossRef]
  29. Loengbudnark, W., Chankitisakul, V., Duangjinda, M., & Boonkum, W. (2024). Sustainable growth through Thai native chicken farming: Lessons from rural communities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(17). [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, T., & Emon, M. M. H. (2025). Supply chain performance in the age of Industry 4.0: evidence from manufacturing sector. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(1), 2434. [CrossRef]
  31. Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review on Sustainability Integration and Marketing Intelligence in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(4), 6–28. [CrossRef]
  32. Xiaoyan, Z., Keoy, K.-H., & Lim, A.-F. (2024). Unlocking the potential of metaverse integration in supply chains: A literature review. Paper Asia, 40(4), 94–113. [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, Y., Fu, S., Ma, F., & Miao, B. (2024). The complexity analysis of decision-making for horizontal fresh supply chains under a trade-off between fresh-keeping and carbon emission reduction. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 183. [CrossRef]
  34. Rosman, A., MacPherson, J., Arndt, M., & Helming, K. (2024). Perceived resilience of community-supported agriculture in Germany. Agricultural Systems, 220. [CrossRef]
  35. Sortino, A., De Leo, G., Andò, A., Caruso, T., Zinnai, A., & Beltrame, F. (2024). The importance of standardization in nursery management and production: A blockchain approach. Acta Horticulturae, 1(1413), 219–223. [CrossRef]
  36. Mutambik, I. (2024). Digital transformation as a driver of sustainability performance—A study from the freight and logistics industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(10). [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, Y., & Zhu, T. (2024). Status and prospects of lithium iron phosphate manufacturing in the lithium battery industry. MRS Communications, 14(5), 888–899. [CrossRef]
  38. Senapati, T., Sarkar, A., & Chen, G. (2024). Enhancing healthcare supply chain management through artificial intelligence-driven group decision-making with Sugeno–Weber triangular norms in a dual hesitant q-rung orthopair fuzzy context. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 135. [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, D., & Wang, G. (2024). The sustainability journey of Chinese ready-meal companies going global: Configurational analysis using the technology-organization-environment framework. Foods, 13(14). [CrossRef]
  40. Nie, Y., Zhu, M., Zhang, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Wang, L., Wang, B., Zhou, C., Chen, L., Sun, X., & Li, Z. (2024). A supply chain optimization for bioenergy potential estimation of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) on marginal land in China. Biomass and Bioenergy, 188. [CrossRef]
  41. Mosayebi, M., Fathi, M., Hedayati, M. K., & Ivanov, D. (2024). Time-to-adapt (TTA). International Journal of Production Economics, 278. [CrossRef]
  42. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., & Rahman, S. (2024). Marketing Strategy Innovation via AI Adoption: A Study on Bangladeshi SMEs in the Context of Industry 5.0. 2024 6th International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 5.0 (STI), 1-6.
  43. Khan, T., Emon, M. M. H., & Nath, A. (2024). Quantifying the Effects of AI-Driven Inventory Management on Operational Efficiency in Online Retail. 2024 27th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 1-6.
  44. Li, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Exploring asymmetric gender-based satisfaction of delivery riders in real-time crowdsourcing logistics platforms. Symmetry, 16(11). [CrossRef]
  45. Roberts, N., Walton, E., & Masury, K. (2024). Climate winners: Adapting to shifting species in the New England supply chain. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 153(6), 714–745. [CrossRef]
  46. Arifin, F., Wiryono, S. K., Damayanti, S. M., & Yudoko, G. (2024). Revolutionizing efficiency: The path to sustainable oilfield services in Indonesia’s energy landscape – The case of Pertamina drilling services. Heliyon, 10(20). [CrossRef]
  47. Kwofie, T. E., Addy, M. N., Marful, A. B., Aigbavboa, C. O., Amos-Abanyie, S., & Baffoe-Ashun, A. I. (2024). An evaluation of the adaptive performance of architects in project teams in Ghana using fuzzy approach. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 17(4–5), 804–828. [CrossRef]
  48. Rath, K. C., Panda, L. P., Rao, N. V. J., Mohanta, G. K., & Panda, A. (2024). Advanced computational forecasting for agri-business supply chain resilience. In Advanced Computational Methods for Agri-Business Sustainability (pp. 36–55). [CrossRef]
  49. Brandao, M. S., & Godinho Filho, M. (2024). Changing terms, evolving strategies: The tailoring of supply chain management terms and its implications. Supply Chain Management, 29(4), 778–793. [CrossRef]
  50. Ajike, E. O., Adeleke, A. A., Bamidele, A. G., Olubiyi, T. O., Adesuyi, O. O., Ilori, G. E., Ariguzo, V. A., & Binuyo, B. O. (2024). The moderating role of supply chain agility on the relationship between strategic flexibility and organizational market performance in the Nigerian pharmaceutical industry. Paper Asia, 40(5), 337–349. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.

Downloads

66

Views

19

Comments

0

Subscription

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.

Email

Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

facebook logotwitter logolinkedin logo
MDPI Initiatives
Important Links
Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated