Preprint Brief Report Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

User Manual for Coping Strategies Inventory Short Form (CSI-SF) -The Jackson Heart Study

Version 1 : Received: 26 February 2024 / Approved: 27 February 2024 / Online: 27 February 2024 (12:37:47 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Addison, C.; Jenkins, B.; White, M. User Manual for Coping Strategies Inventory Short Form (CSI-SF)—The Jackson Heart Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 443. Addison, C.; Jenkins, B.; White, M. User Manual for Coping Strategies Inventory Short Form (CSI-SF)—The Jackson Heart Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2024, 21, 443.

Abstract

Researchers have asserted that, as patients rely on external powerful sources to control their disorders, in addition to their own internal powers and virtues, examining their coping mechanisms can lead to a better understanding of the initiation and progression of chronic diseases and uncover potential opportunities to balance and enhance their psycho-spiritual well-being and possibly their treatment and recovery. This review serves as a user’s manual for investigators who choose to use the CSI-SF to conduct their research on coping behaviors. The CSI-SF that measures four coping strategies based on 16 items was first assessed using the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) cohort in 2007. The reliability and construct validity of the CSI-SF was also later assessed among hemodialysis patients across 13 countries. In this study, the CSI-SF was assessed to be a reliable and valid instrument for measuring coping strategies. The CSI-SF serves the purpose of developing an inner voice that can assist with understanding how people cope with everyday life. The information gathered from administration of the CSI-SF can inform investigators about environmental cues and triggers that can also impact individual health.

Keywords

Jackson Heart Study; Coping; Validity; Reliability; CSI-SF Manual; African Americans

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.