Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Understanding the Challenges and Uncertainties of Seroprevalence Studies for SARS-CoV-2

Version 1 : Received: 3 December 2020 / Approved: 7 December 2020 / Online: 7 December 2020 (08:19:40 CET)

How to cite: McConnell, D.; Hickey, C.; Bargary, N.; Trela-Larsen, L.; Walsh, C.; Barry, M.; Adams, R. Understanding the Challenges and Uncertainties of Seroprevalence Studies for SARS-CoV-2. Preprints 2020, 2020120126. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0126.v1 McConnell, D.; Hickey, C.; Bargary, N.; Trela-Larsen, L.; Walsh, C.; Barry, M.; Adams, R. Understanding the Challenges and Uncertainties of Seroprevalence Studies for SARS-CoV-2. Preprints 2020, 2020120126. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202012.0126.v1

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 continues to widely circulate in populations globally. Underdetection is acknowledged and is problematic when attempting to capture the true prevalence. Seroprevalence studies, where blood samples from a population sample are tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies that react to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, are a common method for estimating the proportion of people previously infected with the virus in a given population. However, obtaining reliable estimates from seroprevalence studies is challenging for a number of reasons, and the uncertainty in the results is often overlooked by scientists, policy makers and the media. This paper reviews the methodological issues that arise in designing these studies, and the main sources of uncertainty that affect the results. We discuss the choice of study population, recruitment of subjects, uncertainty surrounding the accuracy of antibody tests themselves, and the relationship between antibodies and infection over time. Understanding these issues can help the reader to interpret and critically evaluate the results of seroprevalence studies.

Keywords

Covid-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus; seroprevalence; antibody testing

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Immunology and Allergy

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.