In recent years, the number of open preservation surgeries for treatment of laryngeal Cancer has increased. The purpose of this surgery is to avoid the highly mutilating intervention of a total laryngectomy (TL) and to maintain laryngeal function while ensuring oncological radicality. The aim of this study was to assess the oncologic results of OPHL I and II and to identify prognostic factors that could impact patient survival and local failure rates. This study was conducted on 182 patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with OPHLs between 2005 and 2015. The survival rates of a group of patients treated with TL between 2004 and 2014 were taken into con-sideration to compare survival outcomes. The DSS in pT2 and pT3 tumors in relation to the type of surgery showed no statistically significant difference between OPHLs and TL (p=0.54 and p=0.63 respectively). The 5-years T-recurrence free survival showed that pT4 tumors, perineural/vascular positive invasion and OPHL IIb + ARY treated tumors were associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence (p<0.0001, p=0.0005 and p=0.016 respectively). OPHLs represent an excellent alterna-tive to TL considering the characteristics of the tumor and the general conditions of the patient.

Background: Permanent tracheostomy because of total laryngectomy surgery entails great conse-quences for the patient regarding respiratory physiopathology such as the filtering, humidifying, and heating function of the air by the nose is lost. The use of special stomal filters can determine adequate protection of the trachea-broncho-pulmonary system with a reduction in respiratory pathologies. In fact, in most cases laryngectomee patients are first cigarette smokers who for this reason already have also respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite the availability of tracheal filters, multiple times, as reported in the literature, the patient tends to limit their use due to reported breathing difficulties, especially in conditions of intense breathing. Methods: The objective of this clinical study was to evaluate the most suitable stomal filter for the laryngectomee patient during physical activity. The filters studied were an INHEALTH device (Blom-Singer SpeakFree HME); two ATOS devices (Provox® Life™ Energy HME and Provox® Life™ Home HME); and an FAHL device (Laryvox HME Sport). Results: For this purpose, the performances of 31 laryngectomee patients, subjected to medi-um-high physical effort, were analyzed through a standardized pneumological test, the Six Minute Walking Test (6MWT) which involves a sustained walk lasting six minutes, with evaluation , every 60 seconds, heart rate, oxygen saturation and meters travelled; furthermore, it examines two sub-jective indices, namely, the basal and final dyspnea index and the initial and final muscular fatigue index.

Background: In the present study, we assessed the feasibility and success outcomes of voice prosthesis (VP) changes when performed by speech-language pathologist (SLP). Methods: Patients treated with total laryngectomy (TL) from January 2020 to December 2020 were prospectively recruited from our medical center. Patients benefited from tracheoesophageal puncture. The VP changes were performed by the senior SLP and the following data were collected for each VP change: date of placement; change or removal; VP type and size; reason for change or removal; and use of a washer for periprosthetic leakage. A patient-reported outcome questionnaire including 6 items was proposed to patients at each VP change (Appendix 1). Items were assessed with a 10-point Likert-scale. Results: Fifty-two VP changes were performed by the senior SLP during the study period. The mean duration of the SLP consultation, including patient history, examination and VP change procedure was 20 min (range: 15-30). The median prosthesis lifetime was 88 days. The main reasons for VP changes were transprosthetic (N=34; 79%) and periprosthetic (N=7; 21%) leakages, respectively. SLP successfully performed all VP changes. He did not change one VP but used a periprosthetic silastic to stop the periprosthetic leakages. In two cases, SLP needed the surgeon examination to discuss about the following indication: implant mucosa inclusion and autologous fat injection. The patient satisfaction was high according to the speed and the quality of care by the SLP. Conclusion: The delegation of VP change from the otolaryngologist-head and neck sur-geon to the speech-language pathologist (SLP) may be done without significant complications. The delegation of VP change procedure to SLP may be interesting in some rural regions with otolaryngologist shortage.

Background: Non-surgical organ preservation protocols have known a large diffusion worldwide in the last decades. Their oncological and functional effectiveness in a real-world setting has been recently ques-tioned, also because of the high morbidity of salvage procedures. The aim of this study is to review the outcomes of post irradiation salvage total laryngectomy (STL) and reconstruction with pectoralis major flap. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 37 cases of STL in the period going from January 2015 to December 2021. Data for each patient were extracted from the hospital information system and reviewed. Results: The 3-year overall and disease specific survival are respectively 28% and 51%. All patients with recurrences died from the disease. Only 7 recurrences and 7 consequent deaths for cancer were rec-orded. The other 14 deaths derived from comorbidities, being diabetes the most significant predictive parameter for overall survival. Also low-er postoperative albumin levels were associated with a higher risk of death. Conclusions: Overall survival after STL and reconstruction with PMMF is low but most deaths are due to comorbidities and not to cancer progression or recurrence.