Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Prognostic Value of Fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) Index in Sepsis Patients

Version 1 : Received: 20 April 2024 / Approved: 21 April 2024 / Online: 22 April 2024 (16:30:32 CEST)

How to cite: Yuksel, B.; Albayrak, T. Prognostic Value of Fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) Index in Sepsis Patients. Preprints 2024, 2024041373. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1373.v1 Yuksel, B.; Albayrak, T. Prognostic Value of Fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) Index in Sepsis Patients. Preprints 2024, 2024041373. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1373.v1

Abstract

.Bacground: Sepsis remains a major health challenge worldwide, characterized by a dysre-gulated host response to infection, leading to high mortality and morbidity in intensive care units (ICUs). The Fibrosis 4 (FIB-4) index, originally developed to assess liver fibrosis in hepatitis C patients, has recently been explored for its potential prognostic value in sepsis patients. Method: This study retrospectively analyzed 309 sepsis patients admitted to the Internal Me-dicine and Anaesthesia ICUs between December 12, 2021, and December 15, 2023, to inves-tigate the relationship between FIB-4 levels, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and clinical outcomes. Results: The study found that higher FIB-4 measurements were statistically significantly asso-ciated with increased 28-day mortality, with a cut-off value of 4.9 providing a sensitivity of 54.92% and specificity of 74.25%. Logistic regression analysis indicated that elevated Conclusion:FIB-4 levels were a significant predictor of early mortality, suggesting that the FIB-4 index could serve as a valuable prognostic tool in assessing the severity and prognosis of sepsis patients.

Keywords

Sepsis prognosis; FIB-4 index; Intensive care units (ICUs); Early mortality prediction; Risk stratification

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.