Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Individual progression of S100 calcium-binding protein beta as a surrogate for epilepsy risk: rationale and design of a meta-analysis project

Version 1 : Received: 25 March 2024 / Approved: 26 March 2024 / Online: 27 March 2024 (01:45:03 CET)

How to cite: He, J.; Li, B.; Miao, C. Individual progression of S100 calcium-binding protein beta as a surrogate for epilepsy risk: rationale and design of a meta-analysis project. Preprints 2024, 2024031564. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1564.v1 He, J.; Li, B.; Miao, C. Individual progression of S100 calcium-binding protein beta as a surrogate for epilepsy risk: rationale and design of a meta-analysis project. Preprints 2024, 2024031564. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.1564.v1

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to elucidate the clinical diagnostic value of S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta (S100B) in epilepsy, a topic of ongoing debate among European and Asian epilepsy research centres.Methods and analysis: A structured long-term research plan was developed, comprising three phases. Phase one involves observational studies investigating the correlation between S100B levels in serum or cerebrospinal fluid and epilepsy. Phase two integrates observational and randomised controlled data to establish baseline S100B levels across diverse epilepsy demographics, underpinning the predictive value of S100B for epilepsy. Phase three focuses on randomised controlled trials to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of S100B as an epilepsy biomarker.Ethics and dissemination: All enrolled patients will provide written consent. The ethics committee of the Second Peoples Hospital of Gansu Province, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest Minzu University, China, approved the study (GSSEY2022-KY009-01).Registration: The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023425431).

Keywords

S100B; Epilepsy; Biomarker; Diagnostic marker; Prognostic value

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Neuroscience and Neurology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.