PreprintArticleVersion 1Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed
Assessing the precision of point-of-care immunological analyzer for swift progesterone measurement and guidance for determining the optimal breeding time in bitches
Suwannachote, T.; Wutthiwitthayaphong, S.; Arayatham, S.; Prasitsuwan, W.; Ruenphet, S. A Precision Assessment of a Point-of-Care Immunological Analyzer for Swift Progesterone Measurement and Guidance for Determining the Optimal Breeding Time in Bitches. Animals2024, 14, 377.
Suwannachote, T.; Wutthiwitthayaphong, S.; Arayatham, S.; Prasitsuwan, W.; Ruenphet, S. A Precision Assessment of a Point-of-Care Immunological Analyzer for Swift Progesterone Measurement and Guidance for Determining the Optimal Breeding Time in Bitches. Animals 2024, 14, 377.
Suwannachote, T.; Wutthiwitthayaphong, S.; Arayatham, S.; Prasitsuwan, W.; Ruenphet, S. A Precision Assessment of a Point-of-Care Immunological Analyzer for Swift Progesterone Measurement and Guidance for Determining the Optimal Breeding Time in Bitches. Animals2024, 14, 377.
Suwannachote, T.; Wutthiwitthayaphong, S.; Arayatham, S.; Prasitsuwan, W.; Ruenphet, S. A Precision Assessment of a Point-of-Care Immunological Analyzer for Swift Progesterone Measurement and Guidance for Determining the Optimal Breeding Time in Bitches. Animals 2024, 14, 377.
Abstract
The measurement of sP4 often varies due to different laboratory methodologies and individual canine characteristics. In this investigation, sP4 outcomes obtained from a commercial POC analyzer, designed for efficient sP4 assessment in bitches, were compared with results derived from CMIA, the reference laboratories in Thailand. Thorough documentation encompassed various parameters: mean, standard deviation (SD), 95% confidence interval (CI), minimum and maximum sP4 concentration values. Additionally, we meticulously recorded the Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient, and the bias correction factor. Interestingly, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the means obtained by the POC and CMIA. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient between POC and CMIA stood at 0.957, with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient for POC recorded as 0.949. Furthermore, the bias correction factor was established at 0.991. This investigation followed established CMIA guidelines, modified to incorporate the mean and 95% CI as criteria for optimal breeding time using the POC analyzer. In conclusion, the commercial POC immunologic analyzer emerges as a valuable tool, aiding in precisely determining the optimal timing for natural mating or artificial insemination in bitches.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
