Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Wu, L. Comparative Study on the Effects of Different Soil Improvement Methods in Blueberry Soil. Agronomy2024, 14, 125.
Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Wu, L. Comparative Study on the Effects of Different Soil Improvement Methods in Blueberry Soil. Agronomy 2024, 14, 125.
Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Wu, L. Comparative Study on the Effects of Different Soil Improvement Methods in Blueberry Soil. Agronomy2024, 14, 125.
Li, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Wang, C.; Wu, L. Comparative Study on the Effects of Different Soil Improvement Methods in Blueberry Soil. Agronomy 2024, 14, 125.
Abstract
Soil improvement methods can result in changes in the microbial community in blueberry soil. However, there have been few reports on the impacts of different soil improvement methods on the microbial function, particularly on endophytic microbe. In this study, we analyzed the response of microbial community composition, microbial function and nitrogen (N) cycle to different improvement methods using high throughput sequencing. We aimed to investigate the best soil improvement method from a microbial perspective. The results showed that the highest microbial diversity was observed in the T4 treatment (peat combined with mushroom bran), followed by the T2 treatment (peat combined with acidified rice husk) both in the rhizosphere and roots. The dominant phyla were Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, which were most abundance in the T4 and T1 (peat combined with sulfur) treatments in the rhizosphere soil, respectively, but showed the opposite trend in the root endophytic bacterial community. Interestingly, Acidobacterium and Paludibaculum, belonging to the Acidobacteria phylum, were found to have the highest influence according to the correlation network analysis. And these bacteria were most abundant in the T2 treatment in the rhizosphere soil. The rhizosphere soil microbial communities were clustered into two categories: one for T1 and T2 treatments, and another for T3 (mushroom bran) and T4 treatments. Compared to the other treatments, the T1 treatment had the most significant impact on microbial functional pathways in the blueberry roots. T2 treatment promoted the growth of N fixation functional bacteria both in the rhizosphere soil and roots. At the module level, the T2 treatment increased the relative abundance of N fixation and decreased the relative abundance of assimilating nitrate reduction reaction (ANRA), dissimilating nitrate reduction reaction (DNRA), denitrification and completed nitrification in the blueberry rhizosphere soil. Additionally, the T2 treatment increased the abundance of root endophytic microbes involved in N fixation. Overall, our findings suggest that the addition of peat combined with acidified rice husk is the optimal soil improvement method for blueberry cultivation.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
