Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Interlaboratory Comparison of SpermX™ and Conventional Differential Extractions Indicated High Male DNA Recovery by the SpermX Method

Version 1 : Received: 6 September 2023 / Approved: 7 September 2023 / Online: 8 September 2023 (04:56:01 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Sgueglia, J.B.; Holt, H.; Hanson, E.; Nichols, J.; Kalafut, T.; Khan, M.-R.; Walsh, T.; Foley, M.; Brown, H.; Ballantyne, J.; Sinha, S.K. Interlaboratory Comparison of SpermX™ and Conventional Differential Extractions Indicated High Male DNA Recovery by the SpermX Method. Forensic Sci. 2023, 3, 592-610. Sgueglia, J.B.; Holt, H.; Hanson, E.; Nichols, J.; Kalafut, T.; Khan, M.-R.; Walsh, T.; Foley, M.; Brown, H.; Ballantyne, J.; Sinha, S.K. Interlaboratory Comparison of SpermX™ and Conventional Differential Extractions Indicated High Male DNA Recovery by the SpermX Method. Forensic Sci. 2023, 3, 592-610.

Abstract

The National Institute of Justice reported that current methods for processing sexual assault samples have a high failure rate, with 60 to 80 percent of tested kits unable to produce usable DNA profiles. Even when samples test positive for male DNA, 34 percent of sexual assault kits (SAK) do not yield recovered male DNA after differential extraction. Less than 30% recovery of available sperm DNA contributes to this low success rate. The SpermX™ method (SX) has been shown to recover 80 percent or more of sperm DNA from sexual assault samples. An interlaboratory evaluation compared SX to standard differential extraction (DE) protocols. Mock samples with known ratios of female epithelial cells and sperm cells were processed using both methods. Results revealed that SX consistently provided CODIS up-loadable DNA profiles, even with as few as 25 sperm cells, whereas DE failed to produce usable results. On average, SX yielded a seven-fold increase in the recovery of unshared male alleles compared to DE. In conclusion, SX outperformed DE in recovering higher quantities of male DNA with minimal female carryover in sexual assault-type samples. This improved success rate in obtaining usable DNA profiles can significantly aid in solving sexual assault cases. Keywords: Differential extraction, Sexual Assault Kit (SAK), Sperm DNA, STRmix™, Combined DNA Index System (CODIS), Forensic DNA analysis, Low Sperm Samples, DNA Mixtures, Autosomal STR Analysis, SpermX.

Keywords

Differential extraction; Sexual Assault Kit (SAK); Sperm DNA; STRmix™, Combined DNA Index System (CODIS); Forensic DNA analysis; Low Sperm Samples; DNA Mixtures; Autosomal STR Analysis; SpermX

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Life Sciences

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.