Preprint Hypothesis Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The Food-Crushing Reflex, and Its Inhibition

Version 1 : Received: 6 May 2023 / Approved: 8 May 2023 / Online: 8 May 2023 (08:47:47 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 20 September 2023 / Approved: 21 September 2023 / Online: 21 September 2023 (10:29:32 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Vaahtoniemi, L.H. The Food-Crushing Reflex and Its Inhibition. Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2, 550-564. Vaahtoniemi, L.H. The Food-Crushing Reflex and Its Inhibition. Appl. Biosci. 2023, 2, 550-564.

Abstract

Anterior-tooth (ANT) contacts induce short latency reflex inhibition of human jaw-closing muscles. The jaw is a rigid class 1 lever for pinpoint-targeting muscle force into a single bite-point, the pivoting food particle. See-saw reflex movements around the food particle fulcrum multiply the food-crushing force. Unpredictable jolts of reaction force caused by food-crushing are subjected to the rostral ANT and caudally to the two articulate ends of the jaw triangle. Compression/distraction strains of food-crushing must be monitored and inhibited by withdrawal reflexes. The mesencephalic ganglion (Vmes), neural myelin sheath, and muscle stretch receptors evolved subsequently to the advent of jaws to improve the velocity of proprioceptive and withdrawal reflexes. In mammalians, the spindles of the taut motor units, stretched by the food-fulcrum send excitatory monosynaptic feedback for the efferent neurons of the respective ipsilateral muscle units, via Vmes. In the Vmes, the spindle-input-mediating afferent neurons are coupled with another source of afferent feedback, which is also excitatory, from the back-tooth (BAT) mechanoreceptors. The two sources of excitatory pulses are summated and targeted for the efferent neurons to boost the stretched and taut motor units. Likewise, the afferent feedback from ANT mechanoreceptors is also coupled in the Vmes with concomitant feedback from spindles. The ANT output, however, is inhibitory to negate the excitatory feedback from the stretched jaw-muscle units. The inhibitory feed from ANT temporarily blocks the excitatory potential of masticatory motor efferent neurons to protect the ANT and jaw-joints from inadvertent strains. The inhibitory inputs from ANT alternate with the excitatory inputs from BAT to determine which jaw-closing muscle units are activated or inhibited at any given instant of food-crushing. The Vmes exists in all jawed vertebrates, and its’ evolution was probably motivated by demands for the control of bite force. The monosynaptic unilateral food-crushing excitatory and inhibitory reflexes (UFCR) override the coexisting bilaterally executed feed for jaw muscles from the central nervous system. Hypothesis: The Vmes-mediated UFCR combine neural inputs from tooth contacts with concomitant feedback from muscle stretch receptors for the control of mammalian food-crushing bite force.

Keywords

vertebrate evolution; mesencephalic nucleus; primary afferent neuron; jaw movements; dental formulas; chewing reflexes; dental occlusion; brain stem; premaxilla; trigeminal nerve

Subject

Biology and Life Sciences, Neuroscience and Neurology

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 21 September 2023
Commenter: Lauri Vaahtoniemi
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: The Abstract and large parts of the main text are revised in accordance to the reviewers´s comments. Figure 1 is completely redrawn and Figure 2 is added. Several new references have been added.
+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.