Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Risk Prediction of Second Primary Endometrial Cancer in Obese Women: A Hospital-based Cancer Registry Study

Version 1 : Received: 30 June 2021 / Approved: 2 July 2021 / Online: 2 July 2021 (15:54:58 CEST)

How to cite: Chang, C.; Chen, C.; Cheewakriangkrai, C.; Chen, Y.C.; Yang, S. Risk Prediction of Second Primary Endometrial Cancer in Obese Women: A Hospital-based Cancer Registry Study. Preprints 2021, 2021070073. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202107.0073.v1 Chang, C.; Chen, C.; Cheewakriangkrai, C.; Chen, Y.C.; Yang, S. Risk Prediction of Second Primary Endometrial Cancer in Obese Women: A Hospital-based Cancer Registry Study. Preprints 2021, 2021070073. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202107.0073.v1

Abstract

Due to the high effectiveness of cancer screening and therapies, the diagnosis of second primary cancers (SPCs) has increased in women with endometrial cancer (EC). However, there’s no previous literature mentioned about adequate evidence to support screening for SPCs in endometrial cancer. This study was aimed to develop effective risk prediction models of second primary endometrial cancer in women with obesity (Body-mass index; BMI > 25) and this study includes datasets of the incidence of SPCs and the other risks of SPCs in 4480 primary cancer survivors by a hospital-based cancer registry database. In our study, we found the obesity played a key role in SPCs. There’re 10 independent variables used as predicting variables, which corelated to obesity should be monitored for the early detection of SPCs in endometrial cancer. In conclusion, it is a promising SPCs prediction. The proposed scheme can support the important influence of obesity and clinical data representations in all cases after primary treatments. Our results suggested that obesity is still a crucial risk factor to SPCs in endometrial cancer.

Keywords

second primary cancers (SPCs); endometrial cancer (EC); risk prediction.

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.