Τhis study aims to assess changes in the fovea avascular zone (FAZ) in treatment naïve patients receiving aflibercept or ranibizumab injections for diabetic macular edema (DME). This is a prospective study recruiting patients with treatment-naïve DME. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) testing, OCT and OCT-angiography (OCTA) imaging were performed at baseline and 1 month after each injection. Injections of either aflibercept or ranibizumab were administered monthly for 6 consecutive months. FAZ in the superficial (SCP) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) using OCTA was recorded for each visit. Fifty eyes from 50 patients with a mean age of 67.010.7 years were included in the study Twenty-five patients received aflibercept and 25 received ranibizumab. BCVA was 40.810.0 and increased to 52.17.9 ETDRS letters at the last visit (p<0.001). CRT was 295.634.0 at baseline and 247.929.7 at the last study visit (p<0.001). SCP FAZ was 350.679.5μm2 at baseline and 339.071.3μm2 after 6 monthly injections (p=0.132). DCP FAZ was 558.6199.0μm2 at baseline and 459.5156.1μm2 after 6 monthly injections (p<0.001). There was no effect of the choice of ranibizumab or aflibercept on DCP FAZ change (p=0.277). In conclusion, treatment with 6 monthly injections of ranibizumab and aflibercept led to an increase in BCVA and a decrease in CRT and DCP FAZ area. Both drugs led to an improvement in DCP ischemia.

Novel strategies have been developed to reduce or to avoid the intravitreal injections (IVTs) of the antiangiogenic (ranibizumab; RBZ) and the anti-inflammatory (triamcinolone acetonide; TA) agents used to treat vitreoretinal diseases. One of the strategies include liposomes. In this study, it was evaluated the safety and efficacy of topical triamcinolone-loaded liposomes formulation (TALF) as an adjuvant to intravitreal RBZ therapy in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD). Subjects were randomly assigned to the RBZ-TALF or the RBZ-pro re nata (RBZ-PRN) group. Patients from the RBZ-TALF group were instructed to apply TALF for a 12-month period after a single dose of RBZ. Patients from the RBZ-PRN group received three monthly RBZ-IVTs. Retreatment with RBZ was considered in case of nAMD reactivation. Related to safety, non-ocular abnormalities were observed during TALF therapy. Owing to the efficacy, non-significant differences are identified in visual acuity or central foveal thickness when the RBZ-PRN and RBZ-TALF groups are compared. Importantly the average number of RBZ injections was significantly lower in the RBZ-TALF group (2.5 ± 1.4 vs 6.1 ± 1.3 IVTs; p=0004). Therefore, TALF used as an adjuvant to RBZ reduce the number of RBZ-IVTs retreatment with optimal visual and anatomic results.