Background: Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU) have a higher susceptibility to infections. Respiratory infections are the most common nosocomial infections. Rising antibiotic resistance due to indiscriminate use of antibiotics and poor adherence to standard precaution in healthcare facilities compounds the problem. The main aim of this study is to assess microbial patterns and antibiotic resistance from bronchoalveolar lavage specimens in severe pneumonia patients. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in an Indonesian tertiary care hospital from January 2016-December 2020. Written and verbal informed consent was obtained prior to bronchoscopy procedures. Patients were enrolled if they had severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria, had high-risk hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), or pneumonia caused by Coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Respiratory specimens via bronchoscopy were inoculated on general semi-sloid thioglycolate media. Testing for antibiotic susceptibility was done using the disk diffusion method. Results: Two hundred and one patients’ data were analyzed. The majority of patients were males (65,17%) and above 60 years of age. The most common type of pneumonia was CAP (39,3%). Neurologic/cerebrovascular disease was the most common comorbidity (35,32%). Acinetobacter baumannii was the most frequently isolated microorganism. Ampicillin/sulbactam and amikacin were found to yield lower microbial resistance. Conclusion: Combination of ampicillin/sulbactam and amikacin appeared effective as initial empirical therapy in severe pneumonia patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of this combined therapy.

Background & Aims: Reports of a rise in childhood cancer incidence in Australia and globally prompted the investigation of cancer incidence and survival in South Australia (SA) and the Northern Territory (NT) over a 28-year period, with emphasis on Indigenous peoples. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis of two prospective longitudinal databases, the SA and NT Cancer Registries (1990-2017), included all reported cases of childhood cancers. Poisson regression provided estimates of incidence rate ratios and survival was modelled using Cox proportional hazard models for children aged 0.05). With reference to the 1990-1999 era, overall survival improved in subsequent eras in SA (2000-2009: HR 0.53 [0.38-0.73]; 2010-2017: 0.44 [0.28-0.68]); however, remained unchanged in the NT (2000-2009: 0.78 [0.40-1.51]; 2010-2017: 0.50 [0.24-1.05]). In the NT, overall survival of Indigenous patients was significantly lower compared with the non-Indigenous cohort (3.42 [1.92-6.10]). While the survival of Indigenous children with cancer significantly improved in the last two eras (p0.05). Conclusions: The incidence of childhood cancers has remained unchanged over 28-years in SA and the NT. Encouragingly, improved survival rates over time were observed in SA and amongst Indigenous children of the NT. Nevertheless, survival rates in Indigenous children remain lower than non-Indigenous children.