Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Peer Supporters’ Experience of Supporting Second Victims (KoHi-III-Study)

Version 1 : Received: 15 May 2024 / Approved: 15 May 2024 / Online: 16 May 2024 (17:26:43 CEST)

How to cite: Krommer, E.; Klemm, V.; Trifunovic-Koenig, M.; Gatterer, C.; Roesner, H.; Huf, W.; Ettl, B.; Strametz, R. Peer Supporters’ Experience of Supporting Second Victims (KoHi-III-Study). Preprints 2024, 2024051064. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1064.v1 Krommer, E.; Klemm, V.; Trifunovic-Koenig, M.; Gatterer, C.; Roesner, H.; Huf, W.; Ettl, B.; Strametz, R. Peer Supporters’ Experience of Supporting Second Victims (KoHi-III-Study). Preprints 2024, 2024051064. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1064.v1

Abstract

(1) Background: Second Victims are health care workers negatively affected by adverse events and are prone to developing dysfunctional coping strategies compromising not only their own, but also patient safety. An effective way to address this issue is the implementation of peer support programs. This paper reports on the effectiveness of a peer support program at the Austrian Hietzing Clinic (KHI). (2) Methods: Telephone interviews were carried out after peer support sessions using a questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was carried out reporting frequencies and proportions for nominal variables, means with standard deviations for ordinal and interval-scaled variables. (3) Results: So far, 45 peer supporters have completed telephone interviews after a peer support session. The main reasons for the session were bad news from the private sphere and death of a patient. The peer supporters rated the helpfulness of the sessions for their colleagues as very high while not feeling very burdened themselves afterwards. (4) Conclusions: Underutilization of the program is probable. However, the high rating of helpfulness of the carried-out sessions by the peer supporters in combination with them not feeling very burdened, shows that the program is safe for the peer supporters and an upscaling is warranted.

Keywords

second victims; peer support; emotional distress; peer intervention; stress management

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.