Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparative Study of Electrical Loads Forecasting Based on Hybrid Approaches: Discrete Wavelet Transforms with Adaboost and LSTM

Version 1 : Received: 6 May 2024 / Approved: 7 May 2024 / Online: 7 May 2024 (10:51:22 CEST)

How to cite: Moyème, K.; Yao, B.; Sedzro, K. S.; Pidéname, T.; Yendoubé, L. Comparative Study of Electrical Loads Forecasting Based on Hybrid Approaches: Discrete Wavelet Transforms with Adaboost and LSTM. Preprints 2024, 2024050376. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.0376.v1 Moyème, K.; Yao, B.; Sedzro, K. S.; Pidéname, T.; Yendoubé, L. Comparative Study of Electrical Loads Forecasting Based on Hybrid Approaches: Discrete Wavelet Transforms with Adaboost and LSTM. Preprints 2024, 2024050376. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.0376.v1

Abstract

The dynamic evolution and variation of electrical loads is now a priority for optimum management and, above all, forecasting. Indeed, these dynamic load variations require computer tools able to implement optimal load forecasting models. Scientific research into automated models for forecasting electrical loads therefore represents a challenge for scientific researchers. Several research studies have therefore been carried out. These include machine learning approaches such as: LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and others. This article proposes a comparison study between a hybrid model based on the wavelet transform coupled with the adaboost method, and LSTM, for forecasting electricity consumption loads. Python 3.10 was used for the studies. The first results obtained consisted in the study of electricity load forecasts over four (04) data sets of the year (January, April, August and December). These results are very satisfactory, showing a good correlation between the real results of the electrical load consumption data, and the results of the implemented model. The electrical load consumption data are collected from a renewable energy production source: photovoltaic solar energy. The model test results (R2) obtained range from 0.919 to 0.958. These results are representative of real data and reflect the model's performance. The second set of results concerns a comparative study between the methods used by Y. Xie et al (CNN, MLP, LSTM-AM and LSTM-AM-MLP), and our approach. The prediction results obtained between the approaches show a prediction gap ranging from 0.15 to 0.78 for RMSE and 0.83 for MAPE. These results show significant differences between the methods. The minimization of errors by our model, therefore, reflects the model's performance in terms of accuracy, which is necessary for the optimal management of consumer electricity load forecasts in order to ensure balance between supply and demand.

Keywords

optimal management; electricity demand; prediction model; ensemble regression; discrete wavelets

Subject

Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.