Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Community Battery for Collective-Self-Consumption and Energy Arbitrage: Techno-Economic Simulations Assessing Energy Balances, Battery Ageing and Different Market Scenarios

Version 1 : Received: 29 February 2024 / Approved: 1 March 2024 / Online: 4 March 2024 (06:12:07 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Pasqui, M.; Becchi, L.; Bindi, M.; Intravaia, M.; Grasso, F.; Fioriti, G.; Carcasci, C. Community Battery for Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Arbitrage: Independence Growth vs. Investment Cost-Effectiveness. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3111. Pasqui, M.; Becchi, L.; Bindi, M.; Intravaia, M.; Grasso, F.; Fioriti, G.; Carcasci, C. Community Battery for Collective Self-Consumption and Energy Arbitrage: Independence Growth vs. Investment Cost-Effectiveness. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3111.

Abstract

Integrating a grid-connected battery into a Renewable Energy Community boosts Collective-Self-Consumption of photovoltaic produced energy and allow to perform Energy Arbitrage in the day-ahead and intraday electricity market. However, is it a cost-effective investment? The proposed analysis relay on Net Present Value assessment. Ageing affects are integrated and sensitivity analyses are conducted: considering community customers number, electricity mar-ket prices, battery cost, size and the decision to engage in energy arbitrage. Each scenario under-goes a 20-year hourly simulation using an ageing aware rolling-horizon 24-hours-looking-ahead scheduling, optimized with Mixed-integer linear Programming. Forecast errors, provid-ing of ancillary services, real time control and grid constrains are not taken into account. Simulations conducted on the Italian market indicates that a battery dedicated solely to collec-tive self-consumption is not economically appealing. However, integrating Energy Arbitrage, despite impact on battery lifespan, halves the payback period and enhances the attractiveness of larger battery investments. The Net Present Value is contingent upon battery size, customer number and market prices. However, if battery cost does not exceed 200 €/kWh the investment become cost-effective across all scenarios.

Keywords

renewable energy community; battery energy storage system; scheduling; ageing; collective-self-consumption; energy arbitrage

Subject

Engineering, Energy and Fuel Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.