Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Standardization of a Digital Model for the Management of Social Service in the Health Sector of Public Institutions.

Version 1 : Received: 6 February 2024 / Approved: 7 February 2024 / Online: 7 February 2024 (11:24:16 CET)

How to cite: JIMÉNEZ BÁEZ, M.V.; SANDOVAL JURADO, L.; CHAVEZ HERNANDEZ, M.M.; ALCOCER NUÑEZ, F.J.; DOMINGUEZ VARGUEZ, C.I. Standardization of a Digital Model for the Management of Social Service in the Health Sector of Public Institutions.. Preprints 2024, 2024020417. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0417.v1 JIMÉNEZ BÁEZ, M.V.; SANDOVAL JURADO, L.; CHAVEZ HERNANDEZ, M.M.; ALCOCER NUÑEZ, F.J.; DOMINGUEZ VARGUEZ, C.I. Standardization of a Digital Model for the Management of Social Service in the Health Sector of Public Institutions.. Preprints 2024, 2024020417. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202402.0417.v1

Abstract

During the pandemic, educational digitization experienced a significant increase. In Mexico, social service is a crucial component of technical and professional training, a phase during which individuals apply the knowledge gained throughout their university education. The aim of this study is to standardize a digital model for the management of social service in the health care sector within health care units. This study employed an analytical, observational, retrospective, and longitudinal approach, involving two groups of trainees: Group A (n=133), utilizing a Non-Digital Model, and Group B (n=50), employing a Digital Model. In Stage I. the model design underwent validation through the Delphi method with a panel of three experts. The model was implemented on a Classroom® digital platform with the integration of the elements 1) a monthly rotation rubric 2) care services rubric 3) clinical cases or nursing process rubric, and 4) innovation project rubric. The validation of the model achieved 100% agreement (K=1). The variables measured for each group included the school of origin, career, unit of assignment, timely enrolment, and timely delivery of rubrics on the platform. The difference between the two groups was measured using Chi-Square. To measure the impact, the difference in the timeliness of the products was considered. From the University of Quintana Roo, the difference was 20.3 vs 34%. According to the Unit of Attachment the most frequent was HGR No. 17 with Group A at 22.5 vs 52%. According to the product the least delivered was Product 4, with 69% vs 81%. Timely enrollment was observed in Group A at 89% vs Group B at 80% p=0.001. Overall timely delivery in Group A was 81% vs Group B at 91% p=0.001 in the first 6 months post-implementation. Demonstrating that the implementation of the digital platform was effective, representing a significant advance in the adaptation of medical education to the circumstances imposed by the pandemic, highlighting the feasibility and effectiveness of digital teaching methods in the training of health professionals.

Keywords

Education Medical, Education Distance, Benchmarking, Health Services.

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Human Resources and Organizations

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.