Amer, A.; Sidhu, G.; Alvarez, M.I.R.; Ramos, J.A.L.; Srinivasan, S. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science. Educ. Sci.2024, 14, 110.
Amer, A.; Sidhu, G.; Alvarez, M.I.R.; Ramos, J.A.L.; Srinivasan, S. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 110.
Amer, A.; Sidhu, G.; Alvarez, M.I.R.; Ramos, J.A.L.; Srinivasan, S. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science. Educ. Sci.2024, 14, 110.
Amer, A.; Sidhu, G.; Alvarez, M.I.R.; Ramos, J.A.L.; Srinivasan, S. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Strategies in Engineering and Computer Science. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 110.
Abstract
This article aims to delve into the Equity, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI) issues prevalent in the engineering disciplines in Canada and Spain, shedding light on the common obstacles faced by underrepresented individuals and highlighting potential strategies to foster a more inclusive and diverse engineering community in these nations. Two strategic lines have been identified: (a) facilitating university education access to underrepresented and minority groups, and (b) Accompanying and guiding such students during university training, setting them up for successful future careers. The article also shows the sets of strategies employed in Canada and Spain, clearly distinguishing the approach taken in the two countries. While in Canada, there is a more decentralized approach wherein the universities device their strategies and agenda to address EDI issues, in Spain there is a stronger and direct involvement of the government to ensure a comprehensive, system-wide approach to tackling EDI issues in academia.
Keywords
Equity; Diversity; Inclusion; strategies; priority areas
Subject
Computer Science and Mathematics, Software
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
