Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Experimental Investigation of Liquid Holdup in a Co-Current Gas Liquid Upflow Moving Packed Bed Reactor with Porous Catalyst Using Gamma Ray Densitometry

Version 1 : Received: 23 November 2023 / Approved: 24 November 2023 / Online: 27 November 2023 (10:20:19 CET)

How to cite: Toukan, A.; Jasim, A.; Alexander, V.; AlBazzaz, H.; Al-Dahhan, M. Experimental Investigation of Liquid Holdup in a Co-Current Gas Liquid Upflow Moving Packed Bed Reactor with Porous Catalyst Using Gamma Ray Densitometry. Preprints 2023, 2023111654. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.1654.v1 Toukan, A.; Jasim, A.; Alexander, V.; AlBazzaz, H.; Al-Dahhan, M. Experimental Investigation of Liquid Holdup in a Co-Current Gas Liquid Upflow Moving Packed Bed Reactor with Porous Catalyst Using Gamma Ray Densitometry. Preprints 2023, 2023111654. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202311.1654.v1

Abstract

This study explores the dynamics of liquid holdup in a lab-scale co-current two-phase upflow moving packed bed reactor, specifically examining how superficial gas velocity influences the line average external liquid holdup at a fixed superficial liquid velocity. Utilizing Gamma-ray Densitometry (GRD) for precise measurements, this research extends to determining line average internal porosity within catalyst particles and the overall external bed porosity. Conducted with an air-water system within a bed packed with 3 mm extrudate porous particles, the study presents a novel methodology to calculate liquid holdup, grounded in Beer–Lambert's law. Findings reveal a decrease in liquid holdup corresponding with increased superficial gas velocity across axial and radial locations, with a notable transition from bubbly to pulse flow regime at a critical velocity of 3.8 cm/sec. Additionally, the lower sections of the packed bed exhibited higher external liquid holdup compared to the middle sections at varied gas velocities. The liquid holdup distribution appeared uniform at lower flow rates, whereas higher flow rates favored the middle sections.

Keywords

upflow moving packed bed reactor; line average liquid holdup; gamma ray densitometry; porous catalyst

Subject

Engineering, Chemical Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.