Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Feasibility of Meat Loss and Waste Estimates Based on Meat Consumption and Availability

Version 1 : Received: 23 November 2023 / Approved: 23 November 2023 / Online: 23 November 2023 (14:32:46 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Colombani, P.C.; Brunner, T.A. Feasibility of Meat Loss and Waste Estimates Based on Meat Consumption and Availability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 458. Colombani, P.C.; Brunner, T.A. Feasibility of Meat Loss and Waste Estimates Based on Meat Consumption and Availability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 458.

Abstract

Meat loss and waste are estimated at each stage along the food chain, but the methods used are complex and the data needed often fragmented. We, therefore, evaluated the feasibility of estimating meat loss and waste using a simpler method comparing meat availability and consumption, using Swiss meat consumption according to a national nutrition survey and Swiss meat availability according to food balance sheets. As availability is reported at the fresh meat level and consumption as consumed, items of the latter were converted to fresh meat equivalents before comparing consumption with availability. Consumed unprocessed meat was directly converted to fresh meat equivalents and consumed meat products after having identified their meat ingredients. Meat availability, meat consumption as consumed and as fresh meat equivalent were 138.4 g/d, 105.5 g/d, and 112.1 g/d, respectively. The resulting total meat loss and waste was 19% and varied from −36% to 38% for the different meat types. Estimating meat loss and waste based on meat availability and consumption derived from a national nutrition survey yielded results varying to such an extent that the evaluated method to estimate meat loss and waste cannot be recommended.

Keywords

meat; poultry; processed meat; fresh meat equivalent; national nutrition survey; food availability

Subject

Public Health and Healthcare, Public, Environmental and Occupational Health

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.