Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts

Version 1 : Received: 20 June 2023 / Approved: 21 June 2023 / Online: 21 June 2023 (03:33:30 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Loi, G.; Scocozza, F.; Aliberti, F.; Rinvenuto, L.; Cidonio, G.; Marchesi, N.; Benedetti, L.; Ceccarelli, G.; Conti, M. 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts. Gels 2023, 9, 595. Loi, G.; Scocozza, F.; Aliberti, F.; Rinvenuto, L.; Cidonio, G.; Marchesi, N.; Benedetti, L.; Ceccarelli, G.; Conti, M. 3D Co-Printing and Substrate Geometry Influence the Differentiation of C2C12 Skeletal Myoblasts. Gels 2023, 9, 595.

Abstract

Cells are influenced by several biomechanical aspects of their microenvironment, such as substrate geometry. According to the literature, substrate geometry influences the behavior of muscle cells; in particular, the curvature feature improves cell proliferation. However, the effect of the substrate geometry on the myogenic differentiation process is not clear and needs to be further investigated. Here, we show that the 3D co-printing technique allows the realization of substrates. To test the influence of the co-printing technique on cellular behavior we realized linear polycaprolactone substrates with channels in which a fibrinogen-based hydrogel loaded with C2C12 cells was deposited. Cell viability and differentiation were investigated up to 21 days in culture. The results suggest that this technology significantly improves the differentiation at 14 days. Therefore, we investigate the substrate geometry influence by comparing three different co-printed geometries – linear, circular, and hybrid structures (linear and circular features combined). Based on our results, all structures exhibit optimal cell viability (> 94%) but the linear pattern allows to increase the in-vitro cell differentiation, in particular after 14 days of culture. This study proposes an endorsed approach for creating artificial muscles for future skeletal muscle tissue engineering applications.

Keywords

Co-printing; murine myoblasts (C2C12); bioprinting; fibrinogen-based hydrogel; polycaprolac-tone

Subject

Engineering, Bioengineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.