Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Numerical Investigation on Hypersonic Flat-Plate Boundary Layer Transition Subjected to Bi-frequency Synthetic Jet

Version 1 : Received: 2 June 2023 / Approved: 2 June 2023 / Online: 2 June 2023 (08:22:32 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Liu, X.; Luo, Z.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, P.; Zhou, Y. Numerical Investigation of Hypersonic Flat-Plate Boundary Layer Transition Subjected to Bi-Frequency Synthetic Jet. Aerospace 2023, 10, 766. Liu, X.; Luo, Z.; Liu, Q.; Cheng, P.; Zhou, Y. Numerical Investigation of Hypersonic Flat-Plate Boundary Layer Transition Subjected to Bi-Frequency Synthetic Jet. Aerospace 2023, 10, 766.

Abstract

Transition delaying is of great importance for the drag and heat flux reduction of hypersonic flight vehicles. The first mode within low frequency and the second mode within high frequency exist simultaneously during the transition of hypersonic boundary layer. This paper proposes a novel bi-frequency synthetic jet to suppress low- and high-frequency disturbances at the same time. Orthogonal table and variance analysis are used to compare the control effects of jet with different frequencies, amplitudes and positions. Linear stability analysis results show that, low frequency synthetic jet can suppress the first mode when it is arranged upstream of synchronization point, while the second mode control effect is relatively weak. The higher the high frequency is, the stronger the suppression effect is on the first mode. For the second mode, the suppression effect is only at f2=89.09kHz. The larger the amplitude, the weaker the promoting effect for the first mode and the second mode, and the more obvious the suppressing effect. For the cases with synthetic jet downstream of synchronization point, all levels of the three parameters promote the unstable mode. In terms of the growth rate with the spanwise wave number, the control effect of the same factor and level under different spanwise wave number is different. In order to obtain the optimal control effect on transition, the three factors and the arrangement position of the synthetic jet should be selected as follows: the position is arranged in the upstream, with f1 = 17.82kHz, f2 = 89.9kHz, a =0.007, so that the maximum growth rate of the first mode is reduced by 9.06% and that of the second mode is reduced by 1.28% compared with the uncontrolled state.

Keywords

hypersonic boundary layer transition; transition delay; bi-frequency synthetic jet; flow control; linear stability theory

Subject

Engineering, Aerospace Engineering

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.