Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

A Comparison of Shell Theories for Vibration Analysis of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Based on an Anisotropic Elastic Shell Model

Version 1 : Received: 21 March 2023 / Approved: 22 March 2023 / Online: 22 March 2023 (09:06:48 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Strozzi, M.; Elishakoff, I.E.; Bochicchio, M.; Cocconcelli, M.; Rubini, R.; Radi, E. A Comparison of Shell Theories for Vibration Analysis of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Based on an Anisotropic Elastic Shell Model. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1390. Strozzi, M.; Elishakoff, I.E.; Bochicchio, M.; Cocconcelli, M.; Rubini, R.; Radi, E. A Comparison of Shell Theories for Vibration Analysis of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Based on an Anisotropic Elastic Shell Model. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1390.

Abstract

In the present paper, the comparison is conducted between three classical shell theories as applied to the linear vibrations of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs); specifically, the evaluation of the natural frequencies is conducted via Donnell, Sanders and Flügge shell theories. The actual discrete SWCNT is modelled by means of a continuous homogeneous cylindrical shell considering equivalent thickness and surface density. In order to take into account the intrinsic chirality of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), a molecular based anisotropic elastic shell model is considered. Simply supported boundary conditions are imposed and complex method is applied to solve the equations of motion and to obtain the natural frequencies. Comparisons with the results of molecular dynamics simulations available in literature are performed to check the accuracy of the three different shell theories, where Flügge shell theory is found to be the most accurate. Then, a parametric analysis evaluating the effect of diameter, aspect ratio and number of waves along the longitudinal and circumferential directions on the natural frequencies of SWCNTs is performed in the framework of the three different shell theories. Assuming the results of Flügge shell theory as references, it is obtained that Donnell shell theory is not accurate for relatively low longitudinal and circumferential wavenumbers, for relatively low diameters and for relatively high aspect ratios. On the other hand, it is obtained that Sanders shell theory is very accurate for all the considered geometries and wavenumbers, and therefore it can be correctly adopted instead of the more complex Flügge shell theory for the vibration modelling of SWCNTs.

Keywords

carbon nanotubes; vibration analysis; anisotropic elastic model; shell theories; natural frequencies

Subject

Physical Sciences, Applied Physics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.