Version 1
: Received: 2 May 2022 / Approved: 5 May 2022 / Online: 5 May 2022 (09:25:26 CEST)
Version 2
: Received: 8 July 2022 / Approved: 11 July 2022 / Online: 11 July 2022 (08:49:57 CEST)
Version 3
: Received: 3 February 2023 / Approved: 6 February 2023 / Online: 6 February 2023 (09:58:00 CET)
Version 4
: Received: 5 April 2023 / Approved: 6 April 2023 / Online: 6 April 2023 (09:19:32 CEST)
Version 5
: Received: 28 June 2023 / Approved: 29 June 2023 / Online: 29 June 2023 (12:42:48 CEST)
Version 6
: Received: 24 November 2023 / Approved: 28 November 2023 / Online: 28 November 2023 (03:47:09 CET)
Version 7
: Received: 15 February 2024 / Approved: 19 February 2024 / Online: 19 February 2024 (15:48:26 CET)
How to cite:
Lambare, J.P. A Critical Analysis of the Quantum Nonlocality Problem: On the Polemic Assessment of What Bell Did. Preprints2022, 2022050015. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0015.v7
Lambare, J.P. A Critical Analysis of the Quantum Nonlocality Problem: On the Polemic Assessment of What Bell Did. Preprints 2022, 2022050015. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0015.v7
Lambare, J.P. A Critical Analysis of the Quantum Nonlocality Problem: On the Polemic Assessment of What Bell Did. Preprints2022, 2022050015. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0015.v7
APA Style
Lambare, J.P. (2024). A Critical Analysis of the Quantum Nonlocality Problem: On the Polemic Assessment of What Bell Did. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0015.v7
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lambare, J.P. 2024 "A Critical Analysis of the Quantum Nonlocality Problem: On the Polemic Assessment of What Bell Did" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202205.0015.v7
Abstract
Despite their Nobel prize-winning empirical verification, the interpretation of the Bell inequality remains controversial. The alleged nonlocal character of quantum mechanics is inextricably related to the formulation of the Bell theorem. However, as is usually presented, the relation disagrees with Bell's approach and is inappropriately posed. The departure from the clear line of reasoning that Bell tried to convey has contributed to a polarization of part of the scientific community. We review part of Bell's work and show how the correct appreciation of Bell's rationale calls for reformulating a widespread argument on quantum nonlocality, yielding a more balanced perspective of the problem. We highlight a more formal proof of quantum mechanics' violation of local causality. For completeness, we mention a few alternatives that may justify considering quantum mechanics as a local theory.
Keywords
Bell inequality; locality; nonlocality; local causality
Subject
Physical Sciences, Quantum Science and Technology
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
