Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Portfolio Risk Assessment under Dynamic (Equi)Correlation and Semi-Nonparametric Estimation: an Application to Cryptocurrencies

Version 1 : Received: 21 October 2020 / Approved: 22 October 2020 / Online: 22 October 2020 (21:50:55 CEST)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Jiménez, I.; Mora-Valencia, A.; Ñíguez, T.-M.; Perote, J. Portfolio Risk Assessment under Dynamic (Equi)Correlation and Semi-Nonparametric Estimation: An Application to Cryptocurrencies. Mathematics 2020, 8, 2110. Jiménez, I.; Mora-Valencia, A.; Ñíguez, T.-M.; Perote, J. Portfolio Risk Assessment under Dynamic (Equi)Correlation and Semi-Nonparametric Estimation: An Application to Cryptocurrencies. Mathematics 2020, 8, 2110.

Abstract

The semi-nonparametric (SNP) modeling of the return distribution has been proved to be a flexible and accurate methodology for portfolio risk management that allows two-step estimation of the dynamic conditional correlation (DCC) matrix. For this SNP-DCC model, we propose a stepwise procedure to compute pairwise conditional correlations under bivariate marginal SNP distributions, overcoming the curse of dimensionality. The procedure is compared to the assumption of Dynamic Equicorrelation (DECO), which is a parsimonious model when correlations among the assets are not significantly different but requires joint estimation of the multivariate SNP model. The risk assessment of both methodologies is tested for a portfolio on cryptocurrencies by implementing backtesting techniques and for different risk measures: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall and Median Shortfall. The results support our proposal showing that the SNP-DCC model has better performance for a smaller confidence level than the SNP-DECO model, although both models perform similarly for higher confidence levels.

Keywords

Gram-Charlier series; DCC; DECO; backtesting; cryptocurrencies

Subject

Business, Economics and Management, Accounting and Taxation

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.