Version 1
: Received: 23 April 2024 / Approved: 24 April 2024 / Online: 24 April 2024 (10:03:29 CEST)
How to cite:
Kosimkhujaev, N.; Huang, K. Get Free Copy: A Multi-Repository Search Platform for Biomedical Publications. Preprints2024, 2024041595. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1595.v1
Kosimkhujaev, N.; Huang, K. Get Free Copy: A Multi-Repository Search Platform for Biomedical Publications. Preprints 2024, 2024041595. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1595.v1
Kosimkhujaev, N.; Huang, K. Get Free Copy: A Multi-Repository Search Platform for Biomedical Publications. Preprints2024, 2024041595. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1595.v1
APA Style
Kosimkhujaev, N., & Huang, K. (2024). Get Free Copy: A Multi-Repository Search Platform for Biomedical Publications. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1595.v1
Chicago/Turabian Style
Kosimkhujaev, N. and Kuan-lin Huang. 2024 "Get Free Copy: A Multi-Repository Search Platform for Biomedical Publications" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.1595.v1
Abstract
We introduce Get Free Copy (getfreecopy.com), a web-based platform designed to streamline the search for biomedical literature across major repositories like arXiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, and PubMed Central (PMC). Addressing challenges posed by paywalls and fragmented databases, it offers a unified interface for efficient retrieval of free, legitimate copies of biomedical literature. The platform's implementation involves a Node.js backend and dynamic front-end display, enhancing accessibility and research efficiency. As an open-source project, Get Free Copy represents a significant contribution to the open-access movement, inviting global researcher collaboration for further development.
Keywords
open science; preprint; web platform
Subject
Biology and Life Sciences, Other
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.