Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

The κ-Model under Test of the Sparc Database

Version 1 : Received: 16 March 2024 / Approved: 18 March 2024 / Online: 21 March 2024 (01:54:38 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Pascoli, G. The κ-Model under the Test of the SPARC Database. Universe 2024, 10, 151, doi:10.3390/universe10030151. Pascoli, G. The κ-Model under the Test of the SPARC Database. Universe 2024, 10, 151, doi:10.3390/universe10030151.

Abstract

Our main goal is here to make a comparative analysis between the well-known MOND theory and a more recent model called κ-model. An additional connection, between the κ-model and two other novel MOND-type theories: Newtonian Fractional-Dimension Gravity (NFDG) and Refracted Gravity (RG), is likewise presented. All these models are built to overtake the DM paradigm, or at least to strongly reduce the dark matter content. Whereas they rely on different formalisms, however, all four seem to suggest that the universal parameter, a0, appearing in MOND theory could intrinsically be correlated to either the sole baryonic mean mass density (RG and κ-model) and/or to the dimension of the object under consideration (NFDG and κ-model). We could then confer to the parameter a0 a more flexible status of multiscale parameter, as required to explain the dynamics together in galaxies and in galaxy clusters. Eventually, the conformal gravity theory (CFT) also seems to have some remote link with the κ-model, even though the first one is an extension of general relativity, and the second one is Newtonian in essence. The κ-model has been tested on a small sample of spiral galaxies and in galaxy clusters. Now we test this model on a large sample of galaxies issued from the SPARC database.

Keywords

SPARC database; galaxy; MOND; Newtonian Fractional-Dimension Gravity; Refracted Gravity; κ-model; dark matter

Subject

Physical Sciences, Astronomy and Astrophysics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.