Preprint Review Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Comparative Review of the Current and Future Strategies to Evaluate Bone Marrow Infiltration at Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis

Version 1 : Received: 6 March 2024 / Approved: 7 March 2024 / Online: 7 March 2024 (13:08:22 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Martin-Moro, F.; Lopez-Jimenez, J.; Garcia-Marco, J.A.; Garcia-Vela, J.A. Comparative Review of the Current and Future Strategies to Evaluate Bone Marrow Infiltration at Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 658. Martin-Moro, F.; Lopez-Jimenez, J.; Garcia-Marco, J.A.; Garcia-Vela, J.A. Comparative Review of the Current and Future Strategies to Evaluate Bone Marrow Infiltration at Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 658.

Abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) requires a complete staging at diagnosis that may have prognostic and therapeutic implications. The role of bone marrow (BM) biopsy (BMB) is contro-versial in the era of nuclear-imaging techniques. We performed a comparative review of 25 studies focused on BM evaluation at DLBCL diagnosis, including at least two of the following techniques: BMB, flow cytometry, and positron emission tomography (PET-FDG). The report about BM involvement (BMi), diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance was collected and compared among techniques. A concordance analysis between BMB, FCM and PET was also per-formed, and we deeply evaluated the implications of the different types of BMi: concordant by LBCL or discordant by low-grade B-cell lymphoma for both BMB and FCM, and focal or diffuse uptake pattern for PET. As main conclusion, BMB, FCM and PET are complementary tools which provide different and clinically relevant information in the assessment of BMi in newly DLBCL.

Keywords

Bone marrow; Large B cell lymphoma; Lymphoma; Histology; Flow cytometry; PET

Subject

Medicine and Pharmacology, Hematology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.