Version 1
: Received: 15 December 2022 / Approved: 19 December 2022 / Online: 19 December 2022 (01:20:58 CET)
Version 2
: Received: 24 April 2023 / Approved: 24 April 2023 / Online: 24 April 2023 (10:49:47 CEST)
How to cite:
Roza, E. From Black-Body Radiation to Gravity: Why Neutrinos are Left-Handed and Why the Vacuum is not Empty. Preprints2022, 2022120309. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0309.v2
Roza, E. From Black-Body Radiation to Gravity: Why Neutrinos are Left-Handed and Why the Vacuum is not Empty. Preprints 2022, 2022120309. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0309.v2
Roza, E. From Black-Body Radiation to Gravity: Why Neutrinos are Left-Handed and Why the Vacuum is not Empty. Preprints2022, 2022120309. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0309.v2
APA Style
Roza, E. (2023). From Black-Body Radiation to Gravity: Why Neutrinos are Left-Handed and Why the Vacuum is not Empty. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0309.v2
Chicago/Turabian Style
Roza, E. 2023 "From Black-Body Radiation to Gravity: Why Neutrinos are Left-Handed and Why the Vacuum is not Empty" Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0309.v2
Abstract
Starting from an overview of neutrino problems and a simplified survey of Fermi’s neutrino theory, it is shown why neutrinos are left-handed and why they seem to show an oscillatory behaviour between their flavours. After addressing the question how to assess the naked mass of the true elementary particles, it is hypothesized that the elementary constituents of the nuclear background energy and the cosmological background energy are the same. This allows to derive the magnitude of the quark’s “naked” mass from the polarization of the vacuum.
Keywords
neutrino; Fermi constant; parity violation; dark matter
Subject
Physical Sciences, Particle and Field Physics
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Commenter: Engel Roza
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author