Schott, D.J.; Saphala, A.; Fischer, G.; Xiong, W.; Gabbrielli, A.; Bordoy, J.; Höflinger, F.; Fischer, K.; Schindelhauer, C.; Rupitsch, S.J. Comparison of Direct Intersection and Sonogram Methods for Acoustic Indoor Localization of Persons. Sensors2021, 21, 4465.
Schott, D.J.; Saphala, A.; Fischer, G.; Xiong, W.; Gabbrielli, A.; Bordoy, J.; Höflinger, F.; Fischer, K.; Schindelhauer, C.; Rupitsch, S.J. Comparison of Direct Intersection and Sonogram Methods for Acoustic Indoor Localization of Persons. Sensors 2021, 21, 4465.
Schott, D.J.; Saphala, A.; Fischer, G.; Xiong, W.; Gabbrielli, A.; Bordoy, J.; Höflinger, F.; Fischer, K.; Schindelhauer, C.; Rupitsch, S.J. Comparison of Direct Intersection and Sonogram Methods for Acoustic Indoor Localization of Persons. Sensors2021, 21, 4465.
Schott, D.J.; Saphala, A.; Fischer, G.; Xiong, W.; Gabbrielli, A.; Bordoy, J.; Höflinger, F.; Fischer, K.; Schindelhauer, C.; Rupitsch, S.J. Comparison of Direct Intersection and Sonogram Methods for Acoustic Indoor Localization of Persons. Sensors 2021, 21, 4465.
Abstract
We discuss two methods to detect the presence and location of a person in a small-scale room and compare the performances. The first method is Direct Intersection, which determines a coordinate point based on the intersection of spheroids defined by observed distances of high-intensity reverberations. The second method, Sonogram analysis, overlays all channel’s room impulse responses to generate an intensity map for the observed environment. We demonstrate that the former method has lower computation complexity and higher accuracy for small numbers of channels, while the latter performs more robustly.
Copyright:
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.