Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Categorical Forecast of Precipitation Anomaly Using the Standardized Precipitation Index SPI

Version 1 : Received: 3 November 2016 / Approved: 4 November 2016 / Online: 4 November 2016 (13:39:29 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Łabędzki, L. Categorical Forecast of Precipitation Anomaly Using the Standardized Precipitation Index SPI. Water 2017, 9, 8. Łabędzki, L. Categorical Forecast of Precipitation Anomaly Using the Standardized Precipitation Index SPI. Water 2017, 9, 8.

Abstract

In the paper the verification of forecasts of precipitation conditions measured by the standardized precipitation index SPI is presented. For the verification of categorical forecasts a contingency table was used. Standard verification measures were used for the SPI value forecast. The 30 day SPI moved every 10 days by 10 days was calculated in 2013-2015 from April to September on the basis of precipitation data from 35 meteorological stations in Poland. Predictions of the 30 day SPI were created in which precipitation was forecasted in the next 10 days (the SPI 10-day forecast) and 20 days (the SPI 20-day forecast). Both for the 10 and 20 days, the forecasts were skewed towards drier categories at the expense of wet categories. There was a good agreement between observed and 10-day forecast categories of precipitation. Less agreement is obtained for 20-day forecasts – these forecasts evidently “over-dry” the assessment of precipitation anomalies. The 10-day SPI value forecast accuracy is acceptable, whereas for the 20-day forecast is unsatisfactory. Both for the SPI categorical and the SPI value forecast, the 10-day SPI forecast is reliable and the 20-day forecast should be accepted with reservation and used with caution.

Keywords

precipitation deficit; precipitation surplus; standardized precipitation index SPI; forecast; verification

Subject

Environmental and Earth Sciences, Geophysics and Geology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.