Sort by
Whole-Body Electrical Muscle Stimulation as an Adjunctive Tool in Cardiac Rehabilitation of a Patient with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Preliminary Case Report
Damian Sendrowski
Posted: 20 April 2026
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Text Neck Syndrome Among Palestinian Medical Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
Mahmoud T. Alhalyqa
,Ahmed A. Abdelrahman
,Ahmed N. Salmoodi
,Mouyad A. Abuobaid
,Sundus F. Shalabi
,Mahdi Aljamal
Posted: 20 April 2026
What AI Cannot Know: Agri-Cultural Relational Knowledge, Embodied Practices, and the Limits of Automation
Sid Heeg
,Aynur Kadir
Posted: 20 April 2026
Study of the Cytotoxic Effect of Au@Rh Core-Shell Metal Particles on the Osteosarcoma Cell Line HOS and the hFOB Osteoblast Cell Line
Sergio Zamudio-Lucero
,Martín Daniel Trejo-Valdez
,Nury Pérez-Hernández
,Ángel Bañuelos-Hernández
,María Elena Manríquez-Ramírez
Posted: 20 April 2026
Speed Control of Induction Motor Drives Based on Combining Slime Mould Optimization Algorithm and Sliding Mode Theory
Kuei-Hsiang Chao
,Kuan-Chih Chang
Posted: 20 April 2026
After-Sales and Maintenance Services: The Hidden Pillar Behind a Successful Electric Vehicle Deployment – A Systematic Literature Review
Alina Panciu
,Claudiu-Vasile Kifor
,Marinela Ință
,Lucian Lobonț
,Mihai Victor Zerbes
Posted: 20 April 2026
Facial Expression Recognition in Anime and Manga Characters: A Comparative Study of Vision Transformers and Convolutional Neural Networks
Elia Santoro
,Luigi Laura
,Marco Parrillo
,Valerio Rughetti
Posted: 20 April 2026
Grape Seed Proanthocyanidins Enhance Time-Dependent HO-1 Activation and Improve Redox Homeostasis in Obesity-Induced Hepatic Dysfunction
María Zamora-Úbeda
,Aina Gironès-Garreta
,Julieta Cirasino
,Josep M del Bas
,Jorge R Soliz-Rueda
,Miquel Mulero
,Enrique Calvo
Posted: 20 April 2026
Protocol Versus Narrative Review Versus Systematic Review Versus Umbrella Review: A Comparative Methodological Analysis for Evidence Synthesis
Maen Mahfouz
Background: The production of evidence syntheses has expanded substantially, yet confusion persists regarding the distinct roles, structures, and scientific validity of protocols, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and umbrella reviews. Mislabeling or conflating these forms undermines research reproducibility and evidence-based decision-making. Objective: To provide a comprehensive, side-by-side methodological comparison of protocols, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and umbrella reviews, including definitions, purposes, key methodological steps, strengths, limitations, and appropriate use cases. Methods: A structured comparative methodological analysis was conducted between February and March 2026. Authoritative guidance documents were identified through a targeted search of PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords “systematic review methodology,” “narrative review,” “umbrella review,” and “protocol registration.” Included sources were the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins et al., 2023), PRISMA 2020 (Page et al., 2021), PRISMA-P (Shamseer et al., 2015), the PRIOR statement for overviews of reviews (Gates et al., 2022), SWiM guideline for narrative synthesis (Campbell et al., 2020), PRISMA-ScR for scoping reviews (Tricco et al., 2018), JBI methodology for umbrella reviews (Aromataris et al., 2015), PROSPERO registry standards, ROBIS (Whiting et al., 2016), AMSTAR 2 (Shea et al., 2017), RoB 2 (Sterne et al., 2019), and GRADE (Schünemann et al., 2011). Key methodological domains (research question formulation, search strategy, risk of bias assessment, synthesis methods, transparency, reproducibility) were extracted and synthesized for side-by-side comparison. Results: A protocol is a pre-registered plan, not a review. A systematic review is a reproducible, bias-minimizing synthesis of eligible primary studies on a focused question. A narrative review is a subjective, flexible summary of a broader topic. An umbrella review is a higher-order synthesis that systematically compiles, appraises, and synthesizes existing systematic reviews. Umbrella reviews extend this hierarchy by synthesizing review-level evidence. Across all domains, systematic reviews and umbrella reviews demonstrated the highest methodological rigor, characterized by predefined protocols, comprehensive search strategies, and formal risk of bias assessment. Protocols functioned exclusively as methodological safeguards, while narrative reviews showed substantial variability and lack of reproducibility. Conclusion: Choosing among these four forms depends on the review question, available evidence base, resources, and intended use. Protocols should precede systematic reviews and umbrella reviews; narrative reviews serve complementary roles in education and hypothesis generation. Accurate differentiation is a prerequisite for maintaining the integrity of evidence-based healthcare.
Background: The production of evidence syntheses has expanded substantially, yet confusion persists regarding the distinct roles, structures, and scientific validity of protocols, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and umbrella reviews. Mislabeling or conflating these forms undermines research reproducibility and evidence-based decision-making. Objective: To provide a comprehensive, side-by-side methodological comparison of protocols, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and umbrella reviews, including definitions, purposes, key methodological steps, strengths, limitations, and appropriate use cases. Methods: A structured comparative methodological analysis was conducted between February and March 2026. Authoritative guidance documents were identified through a targeted search of PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords “systematic review methodology,” “narrative review,” “umbrella review,” and “protocol registration.” Included sources were the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins et al., 2023), PRISMA 2020 (Page et al., 2021), PRISMA-P (Shamseer et al., 2015), the PRIOR statement for overviews of reviews (Gates et al., 2022), SWiM guideline for narrative synthesis (Campbell et al., 2020), PRISMA-ScR for scoping reviews (Tricco et al., 2018), JBI methodology for umbrella reviews (Aromataris et al., 2015), PROSPERO registry standards, ROBIS (Whiting et al., 2016), AMSTAR 2 (Shea et al., 2017), RoB 2 (Sterne et al., 2019), and GRADE (Schünemann et al., 2011). Key methodological domains (research question formulation, search strategy, risk of bias assessment, synthesis methods, transparency, reproducibility) were extracted and synthesized for side-by-side comparison. Results: A protocol is a pre-registered plan, not a review. A systematic review is a reproducible, bias-minimizing synthesis of eligible primary studies on a focused question. A narrative review is a subjective, flexible summary of a broader topic. An umbrella review is a higher-order synthesis that systematically compiles, appraises, and synthesizes existing systematic reviews. Umbrella reviews extend this hierarchy by synthesizing review-level evidence. Across all domains, systematic reviews and umbrella reviews demonstrated the highest methodological rigor, characterized by predefined protocols, comprehensive search strategies, and formal risk of bias assessment. Protocols functioned exclusively as methodological safeguards, while narrative reviews showed substantial variability and lack of reproducibility. Conclusion: Choosing among these four forms depends on the review question, available evidence base, resources, and intended use. Protocols should precede systematic reviews and umbrella reviews; narrative reviews serve complementary roles in education and hypothesis generation. Accurate differentiation is a prerequisite for maintaining the integrity of evidence-based healthcare.
Posted: 20 April 2026
IGF1 Binding to Integrin α6β4 Leads to Binding of the Calx-β Domain to Non-Catalytic (Allosteric) Site of IGF1R Kinase and Enhances Cell Survival
Yoko K Takada
,Yoshikazu Takada
Posted: 20 April 2026
Quantitative Analysis of γ′ and η Phase Evolution in a Ni-Based Superalloy Under Laser-Assisted Heat Treatment
Alotaibi Fawaz Marzouq S
,Usman Ali
,Atta-Ur Rehman
,Talal Ameen Ali Alhemyari
Posted: 20 April 2026
Not All Sleep Loss is Equal: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Rodent Models, Their Neurobiological Validity, and Translational Relevance to Neurological Disease
Edem E Edem
,Sabiu Bala Soja
,Mohammed Rabiu Abba
,Kelechi Favour Chinyere
,Linus Anderson Enye
Posted: 18 April 2026
Losartan Ameliorates Coronary Neointimal Thickening via Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype Modulation in a Mouse Model of Kawasaki Disease
Eisuke Suganuma
,Satoko Honda
,Rina Umiguchi
,Sayaka Ishikawa
,Ayako Shimamura
,Marina Tanaka
,Masashi Kyushiki
,Atsuko Nakazawa
Posted: 18 April 2026
Clinical Features and Outcomes of Surgically Treated Infective Endocarditis in Adults with and Without Congenital Heart Disease: A 12-Year Cohort Study
Shuofang Ren
,Lanlin Zhang
,Yuanhang Zhai
,Sheng Yang
,Jianzhou Liu
,Xingrong Liu
,Shangdong Xu
,Guotao Ma
,Jun Zheng
,Chaoji Zhang
Posted: 18 April 2026
A Comprehensive Approach for Conventional Tunneling Optimization in Urban Areas
Juan Manuel Mayoral
,Mauricio Pérez
,José Francisco Suárez-Fino
Posted: 18 April 2026
Who Bears the Highest Costs of Breast Cancer? A Cost-of-Illness Study in Poland from a Societal Perspective
Michał Seweryn
,Agnieszka Leszczyńska
,Małgorzata Budasz-Świderska
,Tomasz Banaś
,Paweł Michał Potocki
Posted: 18 April 2026
Engineering an Innovative Chimeric Multi-Epitope mRNA Based Vaccine Against Neonatal Calf Diarrhea Pathogens: Bovine Coronavirus, Bovine Rotavirus, and Escherichia coli K99
Mariam Hassan
,Amjed Alsultan
,Dhama Alsallami
Posted: 18 April 2026
Energy-Efficient Mechanochemical Activation of Coal Fly Ash and Slag for Sustainable Cementitious Composites
Rimma Niyazbekova
,Zhanna Ibrayeva
,Jacek Cieslik
,Ainur Ibzhanova
,Saule Aldabergenova
,Mira Serekpayeva
Posted: 17 April 2026
Founding Physics on a Mathematical Background Reality
Markolf H. Niemz
Posted: 17 April 2026
COVID-19 and Glucose Metabolism
Serafino Fazio
,Flora Affuso
Posted: 17 April 2026
of 5,810