Sort by
A Theoretical Framework for MADMs in the Intelligent Leading and Allocation of Human Resources in R&D Projects
Roxana-Mariana Nechita,
Cătălina-Monica Alexe
Posted: 03 July 2025
Socio-Ecological Impacts and Sustainable Transformation Pathways of Soybean Cultivation in the Brazilian Amazon Region
Zhang Min,
Fernando Romero Wimer,
Marcos Jardim Pinheiro,
Paula Daniela Fernández
Posted: 30 May 2025
Land Management Practices To Improve Ecosystem Services In The Amazon
Fernando Romero Wimer,
Min Zhang,
Héctor Enrique Colmenarez Espinoza,
Bill Eglinton Flores Maricahua,
Paula Daniela Fernández
Posted: 29 May 2025
The Role of Regulatory Sandboxes in FinTech Innovation: A Comparative Case Study of the UK, Singapore, and Hungary
János Kálmán
Posted: 30 April 2025
From Many Worlds to Many Realities: The Everett Interpretation as a Lens for Understanding Contemporary Geopolitical Psychology
Michel Planat
Posted: 23 April 2025
e-Government in Central Sulawesi Province Study on Digital-Based State Civil Apparatus Human Resource Development at BPSDM Central Sulawesi
Irwan Waris,
Ani Susanti
Posted: 24 March 2025
The Administrative Burden Experienced by U.S. Rural Residents Accessing Social Security Administration Benefit Programs in 2024
Debra Brucker,
Megan Henly,
Stacia Bach,
Andrew Houtenville,
Kelly Nye-Lengerman
Posted: 19 March 2025
Upgrading Data Governance to Improve Disability-Related Services in Thailand
Sitthisak Chaiyasuk,
Krish Rugchatjaroen,
Somboon Sirisunhirun,
Nopraenue Sajjarax Dhirathiti,
Somsak Amornsiriphong,
Phut Ploywan
Posted: 13 February 2025
Trustworthy AI for Whom? GenAI Detection Techniques of Trust Through Decentralized Web3 Ecosystems
Igor Calzada,
Géza Németh,
Mohammed Salah Al-Radhi
As generative AI (GenAI) technologies proliferate, ensuring trust and transparency in digital ecosystems becomes increasingly critical, particularly within democratic frameworks. This article examines decentralized Web3 mechanisms—blockchain, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and data cooperatives—as foundational tools for enhancing trust in GenAI. These mechanisms are analyzed within the framework of the EU’s AI Act and the Draghi Report, focusing on their potential to support content authenticity, community-driven verification, and data sovereignty. Based on a systematic policy analysis, this article proposes a multi-layered framework to mitigate the risks of AI-generated misinformation. Specifically, as a result of this analysis, it identifies and evaluates seven detection techniques of trust stemming from the action research conducted in the Horizon Europe lighthouse project called Enfield: (i) federated learning for decentralized AI detection, (ii) blockchain-based provenance tracking, (iii) Zero-Knowledge Proofs for content authentication, (iv) DAOs for crowdsourced verification, (v) AI-powered digital watermarking, (vi) explainable AI (XAI) for content detection, and (vii) Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML). By leveraging these approaches, the framework strengthens AI governance through peer-to-peer (P2P) structures while addressing the socio-political challenges of AI-driven misinformation. Ultimately, this research contributes to the development of resilient democratic systems in an era of increasing technopolitical polarization.
As generative AI (GenAI) technologies proliferate, ensuring trust and transparency in digital ecosystems becomes increasingly critical, particularly within democratic frameworks. This article examines decentralized Web3 mechanisms—blockchain, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and data cooperatives—as foundational tools for enhancing trust in GenAI. These mechanisms are analyzed within the framework of the EU’s AI Act and the Draghi Report, focusing on their potential to support content authenticity, community-driven verification, and data sovereignty. Based on a systematic policy analysis, this article proposes a multi-layered framework to mitigate the risks of AI-generated misinformation. Specifically, as a result of this analysis, it identifies and evaluates seven detection techniques of trust stemming from the action research conducted in the Horizon Europe lighthouse project called Enfield: (i) federated learning for decentralized AI detection, (ii) blockchain-based provenance tracking, (iii) Zero-Knowledge Proofs for content authentication, (iv) DAOs for crowdsourced verification, (v) AI-powered digital watermarking, (vi) explainable AI (XAI) for content detection, and (vii) Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML). By leveraging these approaches, the framework strengthens AI governance through peer-to-peer (P2P) structures while addressing the socio-political challenges of AI-driven misinformation. Ultimately, this research contributes to the development of resilient democratic systems in an era of increasing technopolitical polarization.
Posted: 12 February 2025
Security Policy Transformation to Accelerate Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Papua
Elphis Rudy,
Asep Adang Supriyadi
Background: The Papua region of Indonesia presents a complex challenge to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16, which emphasizes peace, justice, and strong institutions as foundational to sustainable development. Persistent security issues, fueled by the activities of Papua Separatist Groups, have disrupted governance, infrastructure, and societal well-being. These groups, designated as separatist organizations by the Indonesian government, frequently target civilians, public facilities, and security personnel, exacerbating instability and impeding development efforts. Despite implementing measures such as military operations, coercive diplomacy, and the provision of Special Autonomy Funds, the conflict persists, highlighting the limitations of current approaches in addressing the region's socio-political and economic complexities. Furthermore, systemic inequalities, political grievances, and the marginalization of local voices further aggravate the situation, undermining efforts to build inclusive and resilient institutions. The urgent need for a transformative and multidimensional strategy is evident, one that integrates hard power, smart power, and human security principles. Such an approach must address the root causes of conflict while fostering stability, trust, and sustainable development. By aligning security efforts with SDG 16, this study explores culturally inclusive and adaptive strategic solutions to ensure a peaceful and just society in Papua, paving the way for the broader achievement of SDGs across the region. Methods: This study employs a qualitative methodology with a literature review framework supported by thematic analysis of scholarly works, government policies, and regional data. Data collection is enriched by triangulation, incorporating semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and analysis of policy documents. To develop comprehensive solutions, the research assesses the interplay between coercive and non-coercive strategies within human security and strategic culture frameworks. Findings: The findings reveal that current security measures in Papua, dominated by military-focused strategies, often fail to address the root causes of conflict, including socio-economic disparities and political grievances. Approaches integrating hard power with human-centric initiatives, such as community engagement and inclusive governance, show promise in reducing tensions and fostering stability. Strategic cultural adaptations, which respect local traditions and involve community leaders in decision-making processes, have the potential to bridge trust gaps and create long-term solutions. Conclusion: An integrative strategy combining hard power, smart power, and strategic cultural adaptations is essential for addressing the Papua conflict. Enhancing stakeholder collaboration, promoting transparency, and strengthening local governance capacities are pivotal in achieving stability and supporting sustainable development. The proposed framework aims to reduce conflict intensity while aligning security efforts with the region's socio-cultural context and developmental goals. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study emphasizes the significance of adopting a multidimensional, culturally aware approach to managing security challenges in Papua. Integrating strategic culture into security and development frameworks offers innovative insights for resolving protracted conflicts in regions characterized by complex socio-political dynamics.
Background: The Papua region of Indonesia presents a complex challenge to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16, which emphasizes peace, justice, and strong institutions as foundational to sustainable development. Persistent security issues, fueled by the activities of Papua Separatist Groups, have disrupted governance, infrastructure, and societal well-being. These groups, designated as separatist organizations by the Indonesian government, frequently target civilians, public facilities, and security personnel, exacerbating instability and impeding development efforts. Despite implementing measures such as military operations, coercive diplomacy, and the provision of Special Autonomy Funds, the conflict persists, highlighting the limitations of current approaches in addressing the region's socio-political and economic complexities. Furthermore, systemic inequalities, political grievances, and the marginalization of local voices further aggravate the situation, undermining efforts to build inclusive and resilient institutions. The urgent need for a transformative and multidimensional strategy is evident, one that integrates hard power, smart power, and human security principles. Such an approach must address the root causes of conflict while fostering stability, trust, and sustainable development. By aligning security efforts with SDG 16, this study explores culturally inclusive and adaptive strategic solutions to ensure a peaceful and just society in Papua, paving the way for the broader achievement of SDGs across the region. Methods: This study employs a qualitative methodology with a literature review framework supported by thematic analysis of scholarly works, government policies, and regional data. Data collection is enriched by triangulation, incorporating semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and analysis of policy documents. To develop comprehensive solutions, the research assesses the interplay between coercive and non-coercive strategies within human security and strategic culture frameworks. Findings: The findings reveal that current security measures in Papua, dominated by military-focused strategies, often fail to address the root causes of conflict, including socio-economic disparities and political grievances. Approaches integrating hard power with human-centric initiatives, such as community engagement and inclusive governance, show promise in reducing tensions and fostering stability. Strategic cultural adaptations, which respect local traditions and involve community leaders in decision-making processes, have the potential to bridge trust gaps and create long-term solutions. Conclusion: An integrative strategy combining hard power, smart power, and strategic cultural adaptations is essential for addressing the Papua conflict. Enhancing stakeholder collaboration, promoting transparency, and strengthening local governance capacities are pivotal in achieving stability and supporting sustainable development. The proposed framework aims to reduce conflict intensity while aligning security efforts with the region's socio-cultural context and developmental goals. Novelty/Originality of this Article: This study emphasizes the significance of adopting a multidimensional, culturally aware approach to managing security challenges in Papua. Integrating strategic culture into security and development frameworks offers innovative insights for resolving protracted conflicts in regions characterized by complex socio-political dynamics.
Posted: 27 January 2025
Conservation of Fragmented Ecosystems in Urban Environments: Sustainability Indicators and Strategies to Mitigate Biodiversity Loss
María del Carmen Ixtepan Turrent,
Fabiola Colmenero Fonseca,
Carlos Andrés Gómez Ponce,
Javier Cárcel-Carrasco,
Ramiro Rodríguez Pérez
Posted: 24 January 2025
Socio-Economic Innovation Model: Utilization of Shell Waste for Traditional Fisherman Empowerment Through Triple Helix Collaboration
Dara Aisyah,
Novel Anak Lyndonc,
Muhammad Sontang Sihotang,
M. Deny Effendy Tambusay,
Mashudi Mashudi
Posted: 16 January 2025
Globalization or Glocalization – Managerialism Versus Sustainability in Territorial Reforms
Marian Kachniarz,
Pawel Hubar
Research background: The globalization processes are not only of an economic and cultural nature but also unify trends in the organization and management of administration, including at the local level. The idea of economizing administration was promoted within the broad stream of reforms described as New Public Management (NPM). This idea was often expressed as a postulate for the territorial reorganization of local governments. These reforms, motivated by the economies of scale, aimed to eliminate the allegedly overly fragmented nature of local government structures. Critics of these reforms advocate for glocalization, which takes local institutional conditions into account. They argue that the NPM concept should emphasize a long-term balance between economics, environment, and society, which are the paradigms of sustainable development (SD). According to them, this approach provides a more holistic and effective method for public management.
Research background: The globalization processes are not only of an economic and cultural nature but also unify trends in the organization and management of administration, including at the local level. The idea of economizing administration was promoted within the broad stream of reforms described as New Public Management (NPM). This idea was often expressed as a postulate for the territorial reorganization of local governments. These reforms, motivated by the economies of scale, aimed to eliminate the allegedly overly fragmented nature of local government structures. Critics of these reforms advocate for glocalization, which takes local institutional conditions into account. They argue that the NPM concept should emphasize a long-term balance between economics, environment, and society, which are the paradigms of sustainable development (SD). According to them, this approach provides a more holistic and effective method for public management.
Posted: 05 November 2024
Why Scotland Should Be Independent: Historical Context, European Identity, Future Prosperity, and Unique Citizenship Challenges
Richard Murdoch Montgomery
Posted: 07 October 2024
Bad Company: Daewoo and France, 1987–2003
Jill Harsin
Posted: 25 September 2024
Transformation of Organizational Behavior in Village Fund Management: Evaluation Study and Increasing the Effectiveness of Development Programs
Beatus Tampaip,
Yosephina Ohoiwutun,
Alexander Phuk Tjilen,
Pulung Riyanto
Posted: 13 September 2024
The Rise and Transfer of the River Chief System: A Review of Chinese Water Governance and Its Potential to Transfer to the Global Community
David Dolowitz
Posted: 28 August 2024
The Impact of Delayed Retirement and Adjustments to Birth Policies on the Macroeconomy
Qingsheng Zhu,
Jitao Du,
Yanhong zuo
Posted: 21 August 2024
Rethinking the Limits of Polycentric Governance: Towards a More Inclusive Innovation Ecosystem Framework for Sustainable Development in the Global South
Pitshou Moleka
Posted: 14 July 2024
Public Service Provisions for Land Resource Planning in Khao Phanom, Krabi Province in Thailand
Teeraphat Kitjarak,
Shubham Pathak,
Xinlin Qi,
Thussaneeya Boripis
Posted: 06 July 2024
of 3