Background: The use of barbed sutures for pharyngoplasty techniques is a new trend in sleep apnea surgery, but little is known about its short-term results depending on the different techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the surgical results in two different centers using barbed sutures in which the main difference was the loops performed in the soft palate. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) operated in two centers. A statistical analysis comparing the ENT department of the Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni from Forlí with the ENT department of Dr. Peset University Hospital was performed. Results: The final sample size was 138 patients (70 from Forlí and 68 from Valencia). In both series, a significant improvement was observed in OSA patients with significant reductions in respiratory events not related to weight reduction. The mean delta Apnea-Hypopnea index was 13.36 (SD 21.3) in Forlí and 22.8 (SD 22.05) in Valencia (p<0.05). Forlí’s series had a higher proportion of multilevel surgeries than Valencia's and a lower proportion of tonsillar hypertrophy. Conclusion: The number of loops performed in the soft palate may improve the surgical results, nevertheless, this must be confirmed in prospective studies.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) surgery is now a viable solution in selected patients and the “remodelling” palatopharyngeal surgery is the most common one. Recently it becomes less in-vasive with the introduction of Barbed Sutures (BS). An optimization of surgical technique is represented by Barbed pharyngoplasty (BP), that requires surgical precision and needs efficient and precise oropharyngeal visualization. Consequently, the lighting system is of pivotal im-portance in BP. The aim of this work is to describe the first experience on the use of a new light-ing system, called KlaroTM in BP for OSA. We evaluated the Klaro™ system in 15 consecutives BP for OSA in comparison with conventional headlamp illumination. The visualization of pala-topharyngeal muscle in the bottom of the tonsillar fossa, entry and exit needle, such as needle tip were statistically better with KlaroTM than headlamp illumination both for surgeon and resi-dent (p<0.05). No significant differences for the visualization of the posterior pharyngeal wall and uvula were reported. The KlaroTM lighting system allows a satisfied illumination of oral cavity and oropharynx in the majority of cases. We encourage to use of KlaroTM not only in BP for OSA, but also in all oral and pharyngeal surgeries, including tonsillectomy and oncological surgery.