The mechanisms of treatment-resistant epilepsy remain unclear. We have previously shown that frontline administration of therapeutic doses of lamotrigine (LTG), which preferentially inhibits the fast-inactivation state of sodium channels, during corneal kindling of mice promotes cross-resistance to several other antiseizure medicines (ASMs). However, whether this phenomenon extends to monotherapy with ASMs that stabilize the slow inactivation state of sodium channels is unknown. Therefore, this study assessed whether lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy during corneal kindling would promote future development of drug-resistant focal seizures in mice. Male CF-1 mice (n=40/group; 18-25 g) were administered an anticonvulsant dose of LCM (4.5 mg/kg, ip), LTG (8.5 mg/kg, ip), or vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) twice daily for two weeks during kindling. A subset of mice (n=10/group) were euthanized 1 day after kindling for immunohistochemical assessment of astrogliosis, neurogenesis, and neuropathology. The dose-related antiseizure efficacy of distinct ASMs, LTG, LCM, carbamazepine, levetiracetam, gabapentin, perampanel, valproic acid, phenobarbital, and topiramate was then assessed in remaining kindled mice. Neither LCM nor LTG administration prevented kindling: 29/39 vehicle-exposed mice were kindled; 33/40 LTG-exposed mice were kindled; and 31/40 LCM-exposed mice were kindled. Mice administered LCM or LTG during kindling became resistant to escalating doses of LCM, LTG, and carbamazepine. Perampanel, valproic acid, and phenobarbital were less potent in LTG- and LCM-kindled mice, whereas levetiracetam and gabapentin retained equivalent potency across groups. Notable differences in reactive gliosis and neurogenesis were also appreciated. This study indicates that early, repeated administration of sodium channel blocking ASMs, regardless of inactivation state preference, promotes pharmacoresistant chronic seizures. Inappropriate ASM monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy may thus be one driver of future drug-resistance, with resistance being highly ASM class-specific.

Gabapentin (GBP), a GABA analogue, is primarily used as an anticonvulsant to treat partial seizures and neuropathic pain. While a majority of the side effects are associated with the nervous system, emerging evidence suggests a high risk for heart diseases in the patients taking GBP. In the present study, we used a preclinical model of rats to investigate (1) the acute cardiovascular responses to GBP (bolus i.v. injection, 50 mg/kg) and (2) the effects of chronic GBP treatment (i.p. 100 mg/kg/day x 7 days) on cardiovascular function and the myocardial proteome. Under isoflurane-anesthesia, rat blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and left ventricular (LV) hemodynamics were measured using Millar pressure transducers. The LV myocardium and brain cortex were analyzed by proteomics, bioinformatics, and western blot to explore the molecular mechanisms underlying GBP-induced cardiac dysfunction. In experiment (1), we found that i.v. GBP significantly decreased BP, HR, maximal LV pressure, and maximal and minimal dP/dt, whereas it increased IRP-AdP/dt, Tau, systolic, diastolic, and cycle durations (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs baseline; n = 4/group). In experiment (2), we found that chronic GBP treatment resulted in hypotension, bradycardia, and LV systolic dysfunction, with no change in plasma norepinephrine. In the myocardium, we identified 109 differentially expressed proteins involved in calcium pathways, cholesterol metabolism, and galactose metabolism. Particularly, we found that calmodulin, a key protein of intracellular calcium signaling, was significantly upregulated by GBP in the heart but not in the brain. In summary, we found that acute and chronic GBP treatments suppressed cardiovascular function in rats, which is attributed to abnormal calcium signaling in cardiomyocytes. These data reveal a novel side effect of GBP independent of the nervous system, providing important translational evidence to suggest that GBP can evoke adverse cardiovascular events by depression of myocardial function.

(1) Background: Painful nervus intermedius neuropathy (e.g., geniculate neuralgia) involves continuous or near-continuous pain affecting the distribution of the intermedius nerve(s). The diagnosis of this entity is challenging, particularly when the clinical and demographic features do not resemble the typical presentation of this condition. To the best of our knowledge, only three case reports have described the occurrence of nervus intermedius neuropathy in young patients. (2) Case Description: A 13-year-old female referred to the Orofacial Pain clinic with a complaint of pain located deep in the right ear and mastoid area. The pain was described as a constant throbbing and dull, with an intensity of 7/10 on numerical rating scale, characterized by superimposed brief paroxysms of severe sharp pain. The past treatments included ineffective pharmacological and irreversible surgical approaches. After a comprehensive evaluation, a diagnosis of idiopathic painful nervus intermedius neuropathy was given, which was successfully managed with the use of gabapentin. (3) Conclusions and Practical Implications: The diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic pain affecting the nervus intermedius can be challenging due to the complex nature of the sensory innervation of the ear. The diagnosis can be even more challenging in cases of atypical clinical and demographic presentations, which in turn may result in unsuccessful, unnecessary, and irreversible treatments. Multidisciplinary teams and constant knowledge update are fundamental to provide good quality of care to our patients and to not overlook any relevant signs or symptoms.

For voltage-gated Ca2+ channel (VGCC), its α2δ subunits are traditionally considered to be auxiliary subunits that regulates VGCC trafficking to the plasma membrane. The antiepileptic, antinociceptive and anxiolytic gabapentin (GBP) has previously been shown to bind the VGCC α2δ subunits with high affinity to disrupt VGCC trafficking. Yet, the interaction between GBP and α2δ still remains poorly understood from a structural point of view. For instance, it is not clear yet what the structural implication is of α2δ-1-bound GBP against VGCC trafficking. With a set of experimental data-driven structural analysis of the VGCC α2δ-1 and its ligand GBP, this article postulates for the first time that: 1), α2δ-1 bound GBP stabilizes the α2δ-1-GBP complex structure; 2), α2δ-1 bound GBP restrains the conformational flexibility of α2δ-1; 3), α2δ-1-bound GBP establishes an electrostatic axis consisting of Q535 (Gln535)-R241 (Arg241)-GBP (gabapentin)-D452 (Asp452), which constitutes an energetically favourable contribution towards the structural stability of the α2δ-1-GBP complex and helps restrains the conformational flexibility and local structural rigidification of α2δ-1; and 4), GBP-induced local conformational inflexibility and structural rigidification of α2δ-1 is one key step in the pharmacological disruption of VGCC trafficking by GBP.