Dried blood spot (DBS) testing on confetti is one of the most common methods used to collect and extract DNA from field samples for molecular epidemiology of malaria studies. Here, we investigated whether ethanol or other solutions used to clean scissors are a source of sample contamination. DBS were prepared from 3 drops of blood from two Plasmodium falciparum cultures spotted on confetti, and 3 solutions (water, ethanol and DNase) were used to clean scissors between spots during DNA extraction. For each cleaning solution, two blank confetti were used as negative controls. Samples were analyzed by PCR-based genotyping of merozoite surface proteins 1 & 2 (msp-1 and msp-2), and P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (Pfcrt). A total of 15 samples were analyzed. Based on msp-1 and msp-2 amplification, P. falciparum was detected on blank confetti when scissors were washed with ethanol. Based on Pfcrt amplification, DNA of P. falciparum was detected on blank confetti when scissors were cleaned with ethanol or water. No P. falciparum genes were detected on blank confetti when scissors were cleaned with DNase. Scissors cleaned with DNase prevented cross-contamination between samples during processing of dried blood spots, whereas ethanol (which is commonly used) fails to avert cross-contamination.

CRISPR/Cas9-based gene therapy has gotten a lot of interest during last decade. This treatment protocol tries to fix disease-causing traits by changing the DNA code in the exact spot on the chromosome. Therefore, we have tried to elaborate the most current information that shows how well CRISPR/Cas9-based gene therapy works. In vivo methods, like the ones described in the next two lines, are used to study cells in live creatures, like babies that are growing or animals that are already grown up. It has also been suggested to use ex-vivo methods to change somatic stem cells or progenitor cells in a culture outside of the body before putting them back into the patient. CRISPR/Cas is a good way to change specific genes in the DNA. Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats is the full name for CRISPR. Biotechnologists can use them to fix DNA instead of the body's natural ways of doing so. This helps physicians in treatment diseases that run in families more successfully. Cas9 is an enzyme that, along with a guide RNA, is part of the CRISPR/Cas system. As this new technology grows quickly, it is replacing normal medical processes with treatments that are more cutting-edge and can change people's lives. CRISPR-Cas technology has changed biology by making it possible to change genes quickly. CRISPR molecular tools (Cas9 or Cas12a) have a lot of potential, but they are not very useful right now because they depend on the target cell's own DNA repair systems. With or without a template, the body's natural DNA repair processes can fix DNA breaks caused by Cas9 and Cas12a-based technologies. People use these methods a lot, but their effectiveness ranges from cell type to cell type. HDR-mediated DNA repair is a part of cell division, so tools that target it don't work on cells that don't divide, like neurons. CRISPR-associated transposase (CAST) has recently been studied, which suggests that it may offer new ways to change genes with CRISPR. The CRISPR activator of type V-K that is part of CAST has the same structure as the transposase. This is because CRISPR systems can put DNA in the right place without the help of the cell's own DNA repair systems. But a lot of work is being done right now to improve Cas9 and Cas12a so that DNA can be put into a target gene more precisely. Experts are still working hard to come up with better and more reliable ways to change genes, so even though there may be a problem, both methods have useful uses.

The enzymatic activities of bacterial isolates have been widely studied, but a spatial distribution of this activity is rarely focused. New antibiotic-producing microorganisms can be discovered in a more efficient manner if spatial statistical techniques are applied to the distribution of the activity of bacterial isolates in different terrains. This study is focused to generate a series of maps illustrating the spatial distribution of different soil parameters and the inhibition against relative-safe pathogens (like Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Salmonella, Pseudomonas fluorencens and Enterobacter cloacae) in an urban park in València (Spain). This spatial data has demonstrated a higher proportion of isolates was specifically allocated. This routine of data presentation is valuable for understanding bacterial population dynamics at a local level.

Aberrant neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and the loss of barrier integrity in inflamed intestinal tissues have long been associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, whether NETs alter intestinal epithelium permeability during colitis remains elusive. Here, we demonstrated that NETs promote the breakdown in intestinal barrier function for the pathogenesis of intestinal inflammation in mouse models of colitis. NETs were abundant in the colon of mice with colitis experimentally induced by dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS). Analysis of the intestinal barrier integrity revealed that NETs impaired gut permeability, enabling the initiation of luminal bacterial translocation and inflammation. Furthermore, NETs induced the apoptosis of epithelial cells and disrupted the integrity of tight junctions and adherens junctions. Intravenous administration of DNase I, an enzyme that dissolves the web-like DNA filaments of NETs, during colitis restored the mucosal barrier integrity which reduced the dissemination of luminal bacteria, and attenuated intestinal inflammation in both DSS and TNBS models. We conclude that NETs serve a detrimental factor in the gut epithelial barrier function leading to the pathogenesis of mucosal inflammation during acute colitis.

KLHL genes and the related KBTBD genes encode components of the Cullin-E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and typically target tissue-specific proteins for degradation, thereby affecting differentiation, homeostasis, metabolism, cell signaling, and the oxidative stress response. Despite their importance in normal cell function and in disease (KLHL40, KLHL41, KBTBD13, KEAP1, and ENC1), previous studies that examined epigenetic factors affecting transcription were predominantly limited to promoter DNA methylation. Using diverse tissue and cell culture whole-genome profiles, we examined 17 KLHL or KBTBD genes preferentially expressed in skeletal muscle or brain to identify tissue-specific enhancer and promoter chromatin, open chromatin (DNaseI hypersensitivity), and DNA hypomethylation. Sixteen of the 17 genes displayed muscle- or brain-specific enhancer chromatin in their gene bodies, and most exhibited specific intergenic enhancer chromatin as well. Seven genes were embedded in a super-enhancer. The enhancer chromatin regions typically displayed foci of DNA hypomethylation at peaks of open chromatin. In addition, we found evidence that gene neighbors (HHATL and FBXO32) of KLHL40 and KLHL38 harbor enhancer chromatin that likely upregulates the adjacent KLHL gene. Many KLHL/KBTBD genes had tissue-specific promoter chromatin at their 5’ ends, but surprisingly, two (KBTBD11 and KLHL31) had constitutively unmethylated promoter chromatin in their 3’ exons that overlaps a retrotransposed KLHL gene. Our findings demonstrate the importance of expanding epigenetic analyses beyond the 5’ ends of genes in studies of normal and abnormal gene regulation.