Submitted:
03 December 2025
Posted:
05 December 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
The global demand for argane oil has grown considerably in recent years, creating economic opportunities while raising concerns about ecosystem degradation and the sustainability of production systems. To support long-term viability, several initiatives have promoted environmentally friendly practices and fair value-chain models. However, the effective market integration of these initiatives depends on understanding consumer behavior and preferences toward sustainable products. This study aims to identify the determinants influencing consumers’ purchase intention for sustainable argane oil using an extended framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). A structural equation modeling approach was applied to analyze responses from adult consumers with a minimum secondary education level. The results show that consumer attitude, perceived behavioral control, and willingness to pay have significant positive effects on purchase intention, while ecological literacy exerts an indirect influence through attitude, social norms, perceived behavioral control, and willingness to pay. In contrast, ecological literacy has no significant direct impact. These findings improve the understanding of behavioral mechanisms underlying green product consumption and offer insights for designing marketing strategies that align with sustainability values and promote responsible consumer choices.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- How do consumers’ attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control shape their intention to purchase eco-labeled products?
- What is the mediating role of willingness to pay in the relationship between behavioral factors and green purchase intention?
- How do ecological literacy and ecological concern influence consumers’ pro-environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions?
2. Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Attitude Towards Purchasing Green Products
2.2. Subjective Norm
2.3. Perceived Behavioral Control
2.4. Willingness to Pay
2.5. Ecological Literacy
2.6. Ecological Concern
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Sample and Data Collection
| Variable | Grouped sample (881) | Online survey (761) | Direct interview (120) | |||
| Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | Frequency | Percentage | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 382 | 43,4 | 327 | 43,0 | 55 | 45,8 |
| Female | 499 | 56,6 | 434 | 57,0 | 65 | 54,2 |
| Age | ||||||
| 46 or over | 67 | 7,6 | 59 | 7,8 | 8 | 6,7 |
| 36 - 45 years old | 137 | 15,6 | 121 | 15,9 | 16 | 13,3 |
| 26 - 35 years old | 395 | 44,8 | 338 | 44,4 | 57 | 47,5 |
| 18 - 25 years old | 282 | 32,0 | 243 | 31,9 | 39 | 32,5 |
| Academic level | ||||||
| Doctorate or higher | 162 | 18,4 | 153 | 20,1 | 9 | 7,5 |
| Bac+5 | 540 | 61,3 | 461 | 60,6 | 79 | 65,8 |
| Bac+3 | 124 | 14,1 | 106 | 13,9 | 18 | 15,0 |
| Bac+2 | 51 | 5,8 | 38 | 5,0 | 13 | 10,8 |
| Baccalaureate | 4 | ,5 | 3 | 0,4 | 1 | ,8 |
| Household size | ||||||
| More than 10 pers | 3 | 0,3 | 3 | 0,4 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 to 10 people | 48 | 5,4 | 42 | 5,5 | 6 | 5,0 |
| 4 to 6 persons | 406 | 46,1 | 342 | 44,9 | 64 | 53,3 |
| Less than 4 pers | 424 | 48,1 | 374 | 49,1 | 50 | 41,7 |
| Net annual income | ||||||
| More than 360 001 | 20 | 2,3 | 18 | 2,4 | 2 | 1,7 |
| 240 001 - 360 000 | 39 | 4,4 | 33 | 4,3 | 4 | 3,3 |
| 180 001 - 240 000 | 38 | 4,3 | 34 | 4,5 | 14 | 11,7 |
| 130 001 - 180 000 | 111 | 12,6 | 97 | 12,7 | 13 | 10,8 |
| 110 001 - 130 000 | 105 | 11,9 | 92 | 12,1 | 11 | 9,2 |
| 90 001 - 110 000 | 98 | 11,1 | 87 | 11,4 | 7 | 5,8 |
| 70 001 - 90 000 | 48 | 5,4 | 41 | 5,4 | 14 | 11,7 |
| 50 001 - 70 000 | 71 | 8,1 | 57 | 7,5 | 4 | 3,3 |
| 30 001 - 50 000 | 40 | 4,5 | 36 | 4,7 | 11 | 9,2 |
| 0 - 30 000 dirhams | 311 | 35,3 | 266 | 35,0 | 45 | 37,5 |
3.2. Measures
| Variables | Mean | Standard deviation | Factor saturation | |
| Ecological literacy [23,49] | ||||
| LE 1 | You prefer to check eco-labels and certifications on green products before you buy. | 5,14 | 1,77 | 0,57 |
| LE 2 | You prefer to get information about green products before you buy them. | 5,7 | 1,62 | 0,52 |
| LE 3 | Your environmental knowledge helps you buy eco-friendly products and packaging. | 4,99 | 1,93 | 0,55 |
| LE 4 | You know about biodegradable products and packaging | 4,68 | 2,04 | 0,61 |
| Environmental concerns [73] | ||||
| PE 1 | You prefer to check eco-labels and certifications on green products before buying them. | 5,51 | 1,86 | 0,59 |
| PE 2 | You prefer to obtain information on green products before buying them. | 5,94 | 1,73 | 0,65 |
| PE 3 | Your environmental knowledge helps you buy eco-friendly products and packaging. | 5,97 | 1,72 | 0,65 |
| PE 4 | You know about biodegradable products and packaging | 5,9 | 1,78 | 0,61 |
| Attitudes towards environmentally-friendly products [23,74] | ||||
| APRE 1 | Protecting the natural ecosystem is important to you when you decide to buy a product. | 5,2 | 1,85 | 0,52 |
| APRE 2 | Would you prefer an ecological product to a conventional one? | 5,98 | 1,42 | 0,55 |
| APRE 3 | The adoption of environmentally-friendly techniques is necessary for the preservation of the natural ecosystem. | 6,35 | 1,08 | 0,56 |
| APRE 4 | You think that buying ecological products is a positive step | 6,1 | 1,24 | 0,52 |
| Subjective norms [75] | ||||
| NS 1 | Does your family share your eco-friendly attitude? | 4,94 | 1,66 | 0,54 |
| NS 2 | Do your friends share your respect for the environment? | 4,41 | 1,60 | 0,55 |
| NS 3 | Your family shares your decision to buy ecological products | 4,93 | 1,76 | 0,50 |
| NS 4 | Your friends share your decision to buy eco-friendly products | 4,48 | 1,72 | 0,53 |
| Perceived behavioral control [23] | ||||
| CCP 1 | You think you'll be able to buy eco-friendly products in the future. | 4,68 | 1,78 | 0,51 |
| CCP 2 | You have the financial resources to buy eco-friendly products | 4,56 | 1,86 | 0,56 |
| CCP 3 | You have the will to buy eco-friendly argane products. | 4,23 | 1,79 | 0,58 |
| CCP 4 | You are likely to have many opportunities to buy eco-friendly argane products. | 4,38 | 1,78 | 0,58 |
|
Willingness to pay for sustainable argane oil "For sustainable argane oil, I am willing to pay a premium price higher than the conventional argane oil price of:" |
||||
| CAP 1 | Between 0 and 10 dirhams | 3,51 | 1,55 | 0,55 |
| CAP 2 | Between 10 and 20 dirhams | 3,43 | 1,47 | 0,52 |
| CAP 3 | Between 20 and 30 dirhams | 3,31 | 1,45 | 0,61 |
| CAP 4 | Between 30 and 40 dirhams | 2,77 | 1,38 | 0,67 |
| CAP 5 | Between 40 and 50 dirhams | 2,46 | 1,32 | 0,62 |
| CAP 6 | Between 50 and 100 dirhams | 2,17 | 1,26 | 0,54 |
| CAP 7 | Between 100 and 200 dirhams | 1,93 | 1,17 | 0,57 |
| Purchase intention for sustainable argane oil [76] | ||||
| INT 1 | You are likely to buy eco-friendly argane oil rather than conventional argane oil. | 4,44 | 1,90 | 0,62 |
| INT 2 | You plan to buy eco-friendly argane oil the next time you need argane oil. | 5,02 | 1,87 | 0,65 |
| INT 3 | You would actively look for eco-friendly argane oil when shopping. | 4,88 | 1,72 | 0,72 |
| INT 4 | You will choose eco-friendly argane oil when it is available. | 4,86 | 1,64 | 0,74 |
| INT 5 | You intend to purchase eco-friendly argane oil in the near future. | 4,93 | 1,65 | 0,79 |
3.3. Tools for Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Testing of Reliability and Validity of the Measurement Model
4.2. Testing of the Structural Equation Model
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
6. Limitations and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cadario R, Chandon P. Viewpoint: Effectiveness or consumer acceptance? Tradeoffs in selecting healthy eating nudges. Food Policy. 2019;85:1-6. [CrossRef]
- Dangelico RM, Pontrandolfo P. From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. J Clean Prod. 2010;18(16-17):1608-1628. [CrossRef]
- Dolnicar S, Grün B, Leisch F. Market Segmentation Analysis. Published online 2018. [CrossRef]
- Amiri AN, Sharaf S. The Impact of Green Advertising Practices Dimensions on Consumer Green Purchasing Behavior in Food Sector of Afghanistan. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities. 2023;3(5):112-120. [CrossRef]
- Hervey M, Patricia ML, Caroline Castano MN, Patricia Zamuco ML. Consumer Behavior and Practices towards Green Marketing of Food Enterprises. Journal of Business and Management Studies. 2022;4(2):79-99. [CrossRef]
- Aomari A. The responsible consumption: Factor of the development of environmental responsibility in Morocco. Journal of economics, Business and Management. 2014;2(3):219-223.
- Morocco Foodex. Rapport Annuel Des Exportations Agroalimentaires.; 2022.
- ANDZOA. Rapport Annuel Sur La Forêt d’arganier et Les Initiatives de Valorisation.; 2023.
- Lybbert TJ, Aboudrare A, Chaloud D, Magnan N, Nash M. Booming markets for Moroccan argan oil appear to benefit some rural households while threatening the endemic argan forest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(34):13963-13968. [CrossRef]
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211. [CrossRef]
- Fielding KS, Hornsey MJ. A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Front Psychol. 2016;7(FEB). [CrossRef]
- Manaktola K, Jauhari V. Exploring consumer attitude and behaviour towards green practices in the lodging industry in India. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2007;19(5):364-377. [CrossRef]
- Rhodes RE, Blanchard CM, Matheson DH. A multicomponent model of the theory of planned behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11(1):119-137. [CrossRef]
- Chen A, Peng N. Green hotel knowledge and tourists’ staying behavior. Ann Tour Res. 2012;39(4):2211-2216. [CrossRef]
- Han H, Kim Y. An investigation of green hotel customers’ decision formation: Developing an extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Int J Hosp Manag. 2010;29(4):659-668. [CrossRef]
- Chen TB, Chai LT. Attitude towards the Environment and Green Products:Consumers’ Perspective. Published online 2010. [CrossRef]
- Tanner C, Kast SW. Promoting Sustainable Consumption: Determinants of Green Purchases by Swiss Consumers. Psychol Mark. 2003;20(10):883-902. [CrossRef]
- Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude - Behavioral intention” gap. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2006;19(2):169-194. [CrossRef]
- Grankvist G, Biel A. The impact of environmental information on professional purchasers’ choice of products. Bus Strategy Environ. 2007;16(6):421-429. [CrossRef]
- Padel S, Foster C. Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: Understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal. 2005;107(8):606-625. [CrossRef]
- Thøgersen J, Ölander F. Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23(3):225-236. [CrossRef]
- Yadav R, Pathak GS. Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecological Economics. 2017;134:114-122. [CrossRef]
- Maichum K, Parichatnon S, Peng KC. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2016;8(10). [CrossRef]
- Mohammed A, Homaid A, Alaswadi W. Factors influencing green purchase behaviour among young consumers in Saudi Arabia. Transnational Marketing Journal. 2020;8(1):51-73. [CrossRef]
- Auza KA, Mouloudj K. Using the theory of planned behavior to explore green food purchase intentions. University of South Florida M3 Center Publishing. 2021;5(2021):96. [CrossRef]
- Qi X, Ploeger A. Explaining consumers’ intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior. Appetite. 2019;133:414-422. [CrossRef]
- Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2000;11(1):1-33. [CrossRef]
- Park HS. Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Commun Stud. 2000;51(2):162-175. [CrossRef]
- Rivis A, Sheeran P, Armitage CJ. Expanding the Affective and Normative Components of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of Anticipated Affect and Moral Norms. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;39(12):2985-3019. [CrossRef]
- Cheng S, Lam T, Hsu CHC. Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication Intention: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. 2006;30(1):95-116. [CrossRef]
- Ham M, Jeger M, Ivković AF. The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja . 2015;28(1):738-748. [CrossRef]
- Wan C, Shen GQ, Choi S. Experiential and instrumental attitudes: Interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention. J Environ Psychol. 2017;50:69-79. [CrossRef]
- Frank B, Enkawa T, Schvaneveldt SJ. The role of individualism vs. collectivism in the formation of repurchase intent: A cross-industry comparison of the effects of cultural and personal values. J Econ Psychol. 2015;51:261-278. [CrossRef]
- Hofstede Insights. Country Comparison: Morocco. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/morocco/.
- Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2001;40(4):471-499. [CrossRef]
- Vazifehdoust H, Taleghani M, Esmaeilpour F, Nazari K, Khadang M. Purchasing green to become greener: Factors influence consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Management Science Letters. Published online September 1, 2013:2489-2500. [CrossRef]
- Hartono D, Harahap BN. Willingness to Pay for Drinking Water and Sanitation Availability in Indonesia. Working Papers in Economics and Development Studies (WoPEDS). Published online 2007. Accessed February 12, 2024. https://ideas.repec.org/p/unp/wpaper/200712.html.
- Anderson EW. Customer satisfaction and price tolerance. Mark Lett. 1996;7(3):265-274. [CrossRef]
- Hsu CL, Chang CY, Yansritakul C. Exploring purchase intention of green skincare products using the theory of planned behavior: Testing the moderating effects of country of origin and price sensitivity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2017;34(September 2016):145-152. [CrossRef]
- Kotler P, Zaltman G. Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. J Mark. 1971;35(3):3-12. [CrossRef]
- Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G. Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2001;18(6):503-520. [CrossRef]
- Ling C. Consumers’ purchase intention of green products: an investigation of the drivers and moderating variable. Published online 2013.
- Ng M, Law M, Zhang S. Predicting purchase intention of electric vehicles in Hong Kong. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2018;26(3):272-280. [CrossRef]
- Nielsen N. Global Consumers Are Willing to Put Their Money Where Their Heart Is When It Comes to Goods and Services from Companies Committed to Social Responsibility.; 2024.
- Gilg A, Barr S, Ford N. Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures. 2005;37(6):481-504. [CrossRef]
- Paul J, Modi A, Patel J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2016;29:123-134. [CrossRef]
- Lee N, Choi YJ, Youn C, Lee Y. Does Green Fashion Retailing Make Consumers More Eco-friendly? 2012;30(1):67-82. [CrossRef]
- Mahesh N. Influence of Consumers’ Socio-Economic Characteristics and Attitude on Purchase Intention of Green Products. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 2012;4(5):33-37. [CrossRef]
- Mostafa MM. Antecedents of Egyptian consumers’ green purchase intentions: A hierarchical multivariate regression model. J Int Consum Mark. 2006;19(2):97-126. [CrossRef]
- Wang ST. Consumer characteristics and social influence factors on green purchasing intentions. Marketing Intelligence and Planning. 2014;32(7):738-753. [CrossRef]
- Aman AHL. Amran H. dan Zuhal H.(2012). The Influence of Environmental Knowledge and Concern on Green Purchase Intention the Role of Attitude as a Mediating Variable. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences. 7:145-167.
- Bradley JC, Waliczek TM, Zajicek JM. Relationship Between Environmental Knowledge and Environmental Attitude of High School Students. 2010;30(3):17-21. [CrossRef]
- Moorman C, Diehl K, Brinberg D, Kidwell B. Subjective Knowledge, Search Locations, and Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Research. 2004;31(3):673-680. [CrossRef]
- Yang ZJ, Kahlor LA. What, Me Worry? The Role of Affect in Information Seeking and Avoidance. Sci Commun. 2013;35(2):189-212. [CrossRef]
- Kim Y, Yun S, Lee J. Can Companies Induce Sustainable Consumption? The Impact of Knowledge and Social Embeddedness on Airline Sustainability Programs in the U.S. Sustainability 2014, Vol 6, Pages 3338-3356. 2014;6(6):3338-3356. [CrossRef]
- Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res. 2003;56(6):465-480. [CrossRef]
- Schlegelmilch BB, Bohlen GM, Diamantopoulos A. The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. Eur J Mark. 1996;30(5):35-55.
- Alibeli M, White N. The effects of country, gender, social class, and education on college students’ concern about the environment in five arab countries. Crime, Punishment, and the Law. 2009;2:1-15.
- Davies A, Titterington AJ, Cochrane C. Who buys organic food? A profile of the purchasers of organicfood in Northern Ireland. British Food Journal. 1995;97(10):17-23.
- Hutchins RK, Greenhalgh LA. Organic confusion: sustaining competitive advantage. Nutr Food Sci. 1995;95(6):11-14.
- Hanson CB. Environmental concern, attitude toward green corporate practices, and green consumer behavior in the United States and Canada. ASBBS E-Journal. 2013;9(1):62.
- Bamberg S. How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. J Environ Psychol. 2003;23(1):21-32.
- Hartmann P, Apaolaza-Ibáñez V. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. J Bus Res. 2012;65(9):1254-1263. [CrossRef]
- Chen MF, Tung PJ. Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag. 2014;36:221-230. [CrossRef]
- Dunlap RE, Xiao C, McCright AM. Politics and environment in America: Partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Env Polit. 2001;10(4):23-48. [CrossRef]
- Hassan SH. The role of Islamic values on green purchase intention. Journal of Islamic Marketing. 2014;5(3):379-395. [CrossRef]
- Taufique KMR, Vaithianathan S. A fresh look at understanding Green consumer behavior among young urban Indian consumers through the lens of Theory of Planned Behavior. J Clean Prod. 2018;183:46-55. [CrossRef]
- Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Published online 2011:427. Accessed January 22, 2022. https://books.google.com/books/about/Principles_and_Practice_of_Structural_Eq.html?hl=fr&id=mGf3Ex59AX0C.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. and Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. Published online 2010:785. Accessed January 22, 2022. https://books.google.com.my/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?id=JlRaAAAAYAAJ&pgis=1.
- Croasmun JT, Ostrom L. Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. Journal of Adult Education. 2011;40(1):19-22.
- Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal DK. Likert scale: Explored and explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7(4):396.
- DeVellis RF. Scale Development : Theory and Applications. Fourth edition. SAGE Publications Inc; 2016.
- Cheung R, Lau MM, Lam AYC. Factors affecting consumer attitude towards organic food: an empirical study in Hong Kong. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science. 2015;25(3):216-231. [CrossRef]
- Ha HY, Janda S. Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2012;29(7):461-469. [CrossRef]
- Wu SI, Chen YJ. The Impact of Green Marketing and Perceived Innovation on Purchase Intention for Green Products. Int J Mark Stud. 2014;6(5). [CrossRef]
- Afroz R, Masud M, Akhtar R, … MI… S and P, 2015 undefined. Consumer purchase intention towards environmentally friendly vehicles: an empirical investigation in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Springer. 2015;22(20):16153-16163. [CrossRef]
- Nunnally JC, Bernstein I. Elements of statistical description and estimation. Psychometric theory. 1994;3(127).
- Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(5):879-903. [CrossRef]
- Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci. 2015;43(1):115-135. [CrossRef]
- Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to the Study of Self-Concept. First- and Higher Order Factor Models and Their Invariance Across Groups. Psychol Bull. 1985;97(3):562-582. [CrossRef]
- Mufidah I, Jiang BC, Lin SC, Chin J, Rachmaniati YP, Persada SF. Understanding the Consumers’ Behavior Intention in Using Green Ecolabel Product through Pro-Environmental Planned Behavior Model in Developing and Developed Regions: Lessons Learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. Sustainability 2018, Vol 10, Page 1423. 2018;10(5):1423. [CrossRef]
- Tarkiainen A, Sundqvist S. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. British Food Journal. 2005;107(11):808-822. [CrossRef]
- Saleki R, Quoquab F, Mohammad J. Factor affecting consumer’s intention to purchase organic food: Empirical study from Malaysian context. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research. 2020;23(2):168-182. [CrossRef]
- Giao HNK, Ngan NTK, Phuc NPH, et al. How destination image factors affect domestic tourists revisit intention to Ba Ria-Vung Tau province, Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020;7(6):209-220. [CrossRef]
- Amyx DADPFLXHCGWJL. Influencers of Purchase Intentions for Ecologically Safe Products: An Exploratory Study. In: AMA Winter Educators’ Conference Proceedings. 1994.
- Kumar B. Theory of planned behaviour approach to understand the purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products. Published online 2012.
- Ahmad A, Thyagaraj KS. Consumer’s Intention to Purchase Green Brands: the Roles of Environmental Concern, Environmental Knowledge and Self Expressive Benefits. Current World Environment. 2015;10(3):879-889. [CrossRef]
- Chekima B. Consumer values and green products consumption in malaysia: A structural equation modelling approach. In: Green Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global; 2019:206-231.
- Eze UC, Ndubisi NO. Green Buyer Behavior: Evidence from Asia Consumers. 2013;48(4):413-426. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen YTH, Nguyen HV. An alternative view of the millennial green product purchase: the roles of online product review and self-image congruence. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2021;33(1):231-249. [CrossRef]
- Chen MF, Tung PJ. Developing an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model to predict consumers’ intention to visit green hotels. Int J Hosp Manag. 2014;36:221-230. [CrossRef]
- Konuk FA. Consumers’ willingness to buy and willingness to pay for fair trade food: The influence of consciousness for fair consumption, environmental concern, trust and innovativeness. Food Research International. 2019;120:141-147. [CrossRef]
- Lee S. Consumers’ Value, Environmental Consciousness, and Willingness to Pay more toward Green-Apparel Products. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing. 2011;2(3):161-169. [CrossRef]
- Loureiro ML, McCluskey JJ, Mittelhammer RC. Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-labeled Apples? Journal of Consumer Affairs. 2002;36(2):203-219. [CrossRef]
- Wandel M, Bugge A. Environmental concern in consumer evaluation of food quality. Food Qual Prefer. 1997;8(1):19-26. [CrossRef]


| Question item | Cronbach's α | Standardized Factor Loading | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted | |
| Attitude towards purchasing green products (APRE) | APRE1 | 0,729 | 0,592 | 0,75 | 0,43 |
| APRE2 | 0,818 | ||||
| APRE3 | 0,544 | ||||
| APRE4 | 0,651 | ||||
| Perceived behavioral control (CCP) | CCP1 | 0,805 | 0,502 | 0,79 | 0,51 |
| CCP2 | 0,429 | ||||
| CCP3 | 0,881 | ||||
| CCP4 | 0,905 | ||||
| Subjective norm (NS) | NS1 | 0,833 | 0,764 | 0,88 | 0,64 |
| NS2 | 0,755 | ||||
| NS3 | 0,72 | ||||
| NS4 | 0,947 | ||||
| Eco-literacy (LE) | LE1 | 0,701 | 0,717 | 0,73 | 0,48 |
| LE2 | 0,736 | ||||
| LE3 | 0,609 | ||||
| Environmental concern (PE) | PE1 | 0,951 | 0,783 | 0,95 | 0,83 |
| PE2 | 0,942 | ||||
| PE3 | 0,987 | ||||
| PE4 | 0,926 | ||||
| Willingness to pay for sustainable argane's oil (CAP) | CAP1 | 0,896 | 0,346 | 0,88 | 0,53 |
| CAP2 | 0,469 | ||||
| CAP3 | 0,644 | ||||
| CAP4 | 0,851 | ||||
| CAP5 | 0,979 | ||||
| CAP6 | 0,871 | ||||
| CAP7 | 0,704 | ||||
| Intention to buy sustainable argane's oil | INT 1 | 0,893 | 0,646 | 0,80 | 0,65 |
| INT 2 | 0,673 | ||||
| INT 3 | 0,853 | ||||
| INT 4 | 0,894 | ||||
| INT 5 | 0,916 |
| CAP | PE | LE | NS | CCP | APRE | |
| CAP | — | |||||
| PE | 0.112 | — | ||||
| LE | 0.052 | 0.291 | — | |||
| NS | 0.129 | 0.037 | 0.307 | — | ||
| CCP | 0.125 | 0.022 | 0.366 | 0.170 | — | |
| APRE | 0.169 | 0.216 | 0.592 | 0.453 | 0.259 | — |
| Fit indices | Criteria | Indicators | Source |
| Chi-square | p > 0,05 | 1210,989 | [68] |
| Chi-square/df | < 5,00 | 4,485 | |
| Goodness of Fit Indix (GFI) | > 0,90 | 0,905 | |
| Adjusted Goodness of Fit Indix (AGFI) | > 0,90 | 0,876 | |
| Relative Fit Indix (RFI) | > 0,90 | 0,914 | |
| Normed Fit Index (NFI) | > 0,90 | 0,928 | |
| Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | > 0,90 | 0,943 | |
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) | < 0,08 | 0,063 | |
| Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) | < 0,08 | 0,0812 |
| Fit indices | Criteria | Indicators | Source |
| Chi-square | p > 0,05 | 1802,531 | [68] |
| Chi-square/df | < 5,00 | 4,462 | |
| Goodness of Fit Indix (GFI) | > 0,90 | 0,884 | |
| Adjusted Goodness of Fit Indix (AGFI) | > 0,90 | 0,857 | |
| Relative Fit Indix (RFI) | > 0,90 | 0,900 | |
| Normed Fit Index (NFI) | > 0,90 | 0,913 | |
| Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | > 0,90 | 0,931 | |
| Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) | < 0,08 | 0,063 | |
| Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) | < 0,08 | 0,090 |
| Hypothèses | Chemins | Estimation standardisée (β) |
Effet proposé |
Sig. niveau (P) | Décision |
| H1 (+) | APRE → INT | 0,695 | Positive | *** | Acceptée |
| H2 (+) | NS → INT | -0,025 | Négative | 0,334 | Rejetée |
| H3 (+) | CCP → INT | 0,171 | Positive | *** | Acceptée |
| H4 (+) | CAP → INT | 0,173 | Positive | *** | Acceptée |
| H5 (+) | LE → INT | -0,02 | Négative | 0,743 | Rejetée |
| H6 (+) | PE → INT | -0,046 | Négative | 0,126 | Rejetée |
| H7 (+) | LE → APRE | 0,678 | Positive | *** | Acceptée |
| H8 (+) | PE → APRE | 0,029 | Positive | 0,444 | Rejetée |
| H9 (+) | LE → NS | 0,367 | Positive | *** | Acceptée |
| H10 (+) | PE → NS | -0,07 | Négative | * | Rejetée |
| H11 (+) | LE → CCP | 0,441 | Positive | *** | Acceptée |
| H12 (+) | PE → CCP | -0,108 | Négative | ** | Rejetée |
| H13 (+) | LE → CAP | 0,101 | Positive | ** | Acceptée |
| H14 (+) | PE → CAP | 0,094 | Positive | * | Acceptée |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).