Submitted:
14 July 2025
Posted:
16 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Cumulants
3. PHQMD
- Baryon Propagation (QMD Approach): In PHQMD, baryons are treated as Gaussian wave packets and propagated using the QMD model, which includes density-dependent two-body potential interactions. This approach enables the preservation of full n-body phase-space correlations among the baryons, contrasting with traditional mean-field models that average out such correlations [13,14].
- Collision Dynamics (via PHSD): PHQMD considers the collision integral from PHSD to simulate the full evolution of the system, including hadronic collisions, QGP formation, partonic scatterings, hadronization, propagation of mesons and final-state hadronic interactions. The partonic phase is treated using the Kadanoff-Baym equations [15,16]. The model also incorporates in-medium effects such as collisional broadening and modifications of spectral functions for vector mesons (e.g., , , ) and strange mesons (K, , , ), enabling a realistic description of hadronic dynamics in dense and hot nuclear matter.
- Dynamic Cluster Formation: PHQMD takes a dynamic approach to cluster formation with QMD. Instead of applying a static coalescence criterion at a specific time, it allows clusters to emerge through ongoing potential interactions throughout the system’s evolution. Cluster recognition is carried out using the Simulated Annealing Clusterization Algorithm (SACA) [17] or the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) method [12]. The baryon resonances which do not participate in the cluster formation continue to propagate within the PHQMD framework until they undergo their natural decay.
- QGP Phase Identification: In PHQMD, the region where the local energy density exceeds 0.5 GeV/fm³, that regions are considered to be in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) phase, as hadrons are expected to dissolve into their constituent quarks and gluons. In the QGP phase, the partons-quarks, antiquarks, and gluons are scattered and dynamically propagated within a self-generated scalar mean-field potential. As the system expands and the local energy density decreases to the critical value, the partons undergo hadronization into color-neutral off-shell hadrons—mesons and baryons. This process is described by covariant transition rates that conserve energy, momentum, and quantum numbers on an event-by-event basis.
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Aoki, Y. and Endrődi, G. and Fodor, Z. and Katz, S. D. and Szabó, K. K. The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics. Nature, Springer Science and Business Media LLC., 2006, 443, 1476–4687. [Google Scholar]
- Ejiri, S. Canonical partition function and finite density phase transition in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowman, E.S.; Kapusta, J.I. Critical Points in the Linear Sigma Model with Quarks. Phys. Rev. C, 2009, 79, 015202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephanov, M. A. QCD phase diagram and the critical point. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 2005, 20, 4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gavai, R.V.; Gupta, S. QCD at finite chemical potential with six time slices. Phys. Rev. D, 2008, 78, 114503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ejiri, S. and Karsch, F. and Redlich, K. Hadronic fluctuations at the QCD phase transition. Phys. Lett. B 2006, 633, 275.
- Stephanov, M. A. Non-Gaussian fluctuations near the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 032301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stephanov, M.A. On the sign of kurtosis near the QCD critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 107, 052301.
- Schaefer, B. J. and Wagner, M. QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models. Phys. Rev. D, 2012, 85, 034027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaefer, B.J.; Wagner, M. QCD critical region and higher moments for three flavor models. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2009, 103, 262301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, S; Luo, X.; Mohanty, B.; Ritter, H.G.; Xu, Nu. Scale for the Phase Diagram of Quantum Chromodynamics. Science 2011, 332, 1525–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aichelin, J. Quantum molecular dynamics: A Dynamical microscopic n body approach to investigate fragment formation and the nuclear equation of state in heavy ion collisions. Phys. Rept., 1991, 202, 233–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marty, R. and Aichelin, J. Molecular dynamics description of an expanding q/q¯ plasma with the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model and applications to heavy ion collisions at energies available at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C, 2013, 87(3), 034912.
- Marty, R., Bratkovskaya, E., Cassing, W., and Aichelin, J. Observables in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions from two different transport approaches for the same initial conditions. Phys. Rev. C, 2015, 92(1), 015201.
- Cassing, W. From Kadanoff-Baym dynamics to off-shell parton transport. Eur. Phys. J. ST, 2009, 168, 3–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cassing, W. and Bratkovskaya, E. L. Parton transport and hadronization from the dynamical quasiparticle point of view. Phys. Rev. C, 2008, 78, 034919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puri, C, H., and J., A. Early fragment formation in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C Nucl Phys., 2008, 54, R28–R31.
- Miller, Michael L. and others. Glauber modeling in high energy nuclear collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 2007, 57, 205-243.
- Adam, J. and others. Nonmonotonic Energy Dependence of Net-Proton Number Fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2021, 126, 9, 092301.
- Luo, X. Error Estimation for Moments Analysis in Heavy Ion Collision Experiment. J. Phys. G, 2012, 39, 025008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X. Unified description of efficiency correction and error estimation for moments of conserved quantities in heavy-ion collisions. Phys. Rev. C, 2015, 91, 3, 034907.











Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).