Submitted:
11 June 2025
Posted:
13 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Historical Development of Biogas Injera Baking Stoves
3. Recent Innovations and Performance Enhancements in Biogas-Fueled Injera Baking Stoves
4. Performance Metrics and Design Considerations
5. Technical Challenges and Research Gaps
6. Future Research Directions
Development of Pressure-Adaptive Burner Designs
Optimization of Heat Transfer and Mitad Compatibility
Validation of CFD-Based Designs Through Field Trials
Development of Hybrid Energy Systems
Standardization and Certification Protocols.
Life-Cycle Assessment and Economic Feasibility Analysis
Author Contribution
Data Availability
Competing interest
References
- Amtataw, M.; Kassahun, E.; Tibebu, S.; Andargie, T.; Ayanaw, T.; Agazie, A.; et al. Nutritional and anti-nutritional evaluation of injera made from Sorghum, Rice, Teff, and Flaxseed flours using D-optimal mixture design. Sci Rep. 2025, 15, 3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awulachew, M.T.; Kuffi, K.D. Improving the Quality of Injera by Optimizing the Mixing Proportion of Fenugreek, Sorghum and Teff Flour. 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Beyene, A.D.; Koch, S.F. Clean fuel-saving technology adoption in urban Ethiopia. Energy Economics 2013, 36, 605–613. Available online: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140988312002770. [CrossRef]
- Manaye, A.; Amaha, S.; Gufi, Y.; Tesfamariam, B.; Worku, A.; Abrha, H. Fuelwood use and carbon emission reduction of improved biomass cookstoves: evidence from kitchen performance tests in Tigray, Ethiopia. Energ Sustain Soc. 2022, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Desta, G.A.; Melka, Y.; Sime, G.; Yirga, F.; Marie, M.; Haile, M. Biogas technology in fuelwood saving and carbon emission reduction in southern Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2020, 6, e04791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fagerström, A. The role of anaerobic digestion and biogas in the circular economy. Murphy JD, editor. Dublin: IEA Bioenergy; 2018.
- Addis Alemayehu, Y. Status and Benefits of Renewable Energy Technologies in the Rural Areas of Ethiopia: A Case Study on Improved Cooking Stoves and Biogas Technologies. Int J Renew Energy Dev. 2015, 4, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilhate Leta Chala. National Survey on Current Status of Institutional Biogas Systems Installed in Ethiopia. Unpublished; 2009 [cited 2025 Mar 25]. [CrossRef]
- Abdella, T. Experimental Investigation of Biogas Injera Baking Stove Using Circular Ring Pipe Burner. In Review; 2023. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3558204/v1 (accessed on 22 April 2025).
- Ashagrie, Z. Improvement of injera shelf life through the use of chemical preservatives. AJFAND. 2012, 12, 6409–6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bikila, G.M.; Tola, Y.B.; Kuyu, C.G. Standardization of teff [ Eragrostis teff ] injera making process conditions for better physicochemical and sensory quality. Food Science & Nutrition. 2024, 12, 3417–3432. [Google Scholar]
- Lutfi, U.M.; Hendriani, R.; Nefri, J. Applicative Biogas Plant For Processing Cow Dung In The Small Scale Livestock Farming. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Berhe, M.; Hoag, D.; Tesfay, G.; Keske, C. Factors influencing the adoption of biogas digesters in rural Ethiopia. Energ Sustain Soc. 2017, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kebede, D.; Kiflu, A. Design of Biogas Stove for Injera Baking Application. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Abdella, T. Experimental Investigation of Biogas Injera Baking Stove Using Circular Ring Pipe Burner. In Review; 2023 [cited 2025 Mar 25]. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-3558204/v1 (accessed on 25 March 2025).
- Tesfay, A.H.; Tsegay, K.; Kahsay, M.B.; Hailu, M.H.; Adaramola, M.S. Performance comparison of three prototype biomass stoves with traditional and Mirt stoves for baking Injera. Energ Sustain Soc. 2024, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tadesse, M. The Developmental Patterns of Injera Baking Stoves: Review on the Efficiency, and Energy Consumption in Ethiopia. SSRG-IJME. 2020, 7, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandra, A.; Tiwari, G.N.; Srivastava, V.K.; Yadav, Y.P. Performance evaluation of biogas burners. Energy Conversion and Management. 1991, 32, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- K.C.Khandelwal & Vibha k. Popular Summary of the Test Report on Biogas Stoves and Lamps. SNV; 2009 p. 48.
- Nega, D.T.; Mulugeta, B.; Demissie, S.W. Design, Optimization and CFD Simulation of Improved Biogas Burner for “Injera” Baking in Ethiopia. International Journal of Engineering Research 6.
- Nega, D.T.; Mulugeta Yirgu, B.; Demissie, S.W. Improved biogas ‘Injera’ bakery stove design, assemble and its baking pan floor temperature distribution test. Energy for Sustainable Development 2021, 61, 65–73. Available online: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S097308262100003X. [CrossRef]
- Bilhate Leta Chala. Energy efficient injera baking with biogas in Ethiopia. German: HOHENHEIM; 2019.
- Sisay, A.K.; Shiferaw Kebede, M.; Chanie, A.M. Development of an enhanced electrical injera baking pan [Ethiopian Traditional mitad] using steel powder additives and gypsum insulation. Heliyon. 2024, 10, e38952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banooni, S.; Hosseinalipour, S.M.; Mujumdar, A.S.; Taheran, E.; Bahiraei, M.; Taherkhani, P. Baking of Flat Bread in an Impingement Oven: An Experimental Study of Heat Transfer and Quality Aspects. Drying Technology. 2008, 26, 902–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucho, G.; Moll, H.; Schoot Uiterkamp, A.; Nonhebel, S. Problems with Biogas Implementation in Developing Countries from the Perspective of Labor Requirements. Energies. 2016, 9, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rismaya, R.; Syamsir, E.; Nurtama, B.; Tohyeng, N. The effects of water addition and baking time on process optimization of pumpkin muffins: a pilot plant scale study. Canrea 2022, 183–207. Available online: http://agritech.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/canrea/article/view/711. [CrossRef]
- Chaouki Ghenai Isam Janajreh Combustion of Renewable Biogas Fuels, J.E.P.E. 2015, 9[10]. Available online: http://www.davidpublisher.org/index.php/Home/Article/index?id=19269.html.
- Berhe, M.; Hoag, D.; Tesfay, G.; Keske, C. Factors influencing the adoption of biogas digesters in rural Ethiopia. Energ Sustain Soc. 2017, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novak Pintarič, Z.; Kravanja, Z. The Importance of using Discounted Cash Flow Methodology in Techno-economic Analyses of Energy and Chemical Production Plants. J sustain dev energy water environ syst. 2017, 5, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wondimagegn, G.H.; Ahmed, K.; Edao, S.A. Developing and Performance Evaluation of Metal Sand Pan stove for Baking. IIJSR. 2023, 07, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucho, G.; Moll, H.; Schoot Uiterkamp, A.; Nonhebel, S. Problems with Biogas Implementation in Developing Countries from the Perspective of Labor Requirements. Energies. 2016, 9, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Getaneh, A.; Eba, K.; Tucho, G.T. Assessment of Biomass Energy Potential for Biogas Technology Adoption and Its Determinant Factors in Rural District of Limmu Kossa, Jimma, Ethiopia. Energies. 2024, 17, 2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geddafa, T.; Melka, Y.; Sime, G. Cost-benefit Analysis and Financial Viability of Household Biogas Plant Investment in South Ethiopia. Sustainable Energy res. 2023, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Study | Year | Manifold Diameter | Mitad Size | Biogas Flow Rate | Efficiency | Validation Method |
| Dereje | 1996 | N/A [3-ring] | N/A | 41 L/min | 16% | Experimental |
| Mulugeta et al. | 2017 | 26 cm | N/A | Simulated | N/A | CFD only |
| Nega et al. | 2021 | 26 cm | 540 mm | 8.5 m³ plant | N/A | Field-tested |
| Alemayehu | 2012 | Circular rings | 530 mm | 0.93 m³/h | N/A | 5-household test |
| Chala | 2019 | Adjustable conical | 400 mm | 605 L/h | 25% | Experimental |
| Attribute | Description | Tiers [0 to 4] |
| Thermal Efficiency | Measures how efficiently a stove converts fuel into usable heat for cooking. | Tiers 0 [low] to 4 [high] |
| Emissions – CO | Carbon monoxide emissions per useful energy delivered [g/MJd]. | Tiers 0 [high] to 4 [low] |
| Emissions – PM2.5 | Fine particulate matter emissions [μg/MJd], impacting health and environment. | Tiers 0 [high] to 4 [low] |
| Safety | Risk of burns, tipping, fuel overflow, etc., assessed by user interaction tests. | Tiers 0 [unsafe] to 4 [safe] |
| Indoor Emissions | Contribution of the stove to indoor air pollution [for non-vented stoves]. | Tiers 0 [high] to 4 [low] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).