Submitted:
06 August 2025
Posted:
07 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Field Research
2.2. Characteristics of Potato Varieties
2.3. Laboratory Tests
2.3.1. Chips Rating
2.3.2. Determination of Sugars
- −
- The following were introduced into the volumetric flask: 10 mL of Luff solution
- −
- 25 mL of sample.
- −
- The mixture was heated for 10 min in a water bath (95 ± 2°C). After cooling, 10 mL of KI (10%) and 25 mL of H2SO4 (25%) were added.
- −
- Iodine was determined titrimetrically with sodium thiosulfate (0.1 M) against starch.
- −
- Quality control: Each series was analyzed for:
- −
- Blank.
- −
- Positive control (glucose solution).
- −
- RSD < 5% was assumed for replicates.
2.3.3. Fat Content Determination
2.3.4. Moisture Content Determination
2.4. Soil Conditions
|
Year of research |
Content Macronutrients [mg kg-1 soil] |
Humus content [g kg-1] |
pH [KCL] |
Micronutrients content [mg kg-1 soil] |
||||||
| P | K | Mg | Cu | Mn | Zn | Fe | B | |||
| 2015 | 8.9 | 10.9 | 7.8 | 0.94 | 5.9 | 7.51 | 318 | 40.1 | 3760 | 7.24 |
| 2016 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 7.0 | 1.06 | 5.8 | 4.92 | 337 | 56.7 | 3925 | 5.28 |
| 2017 | 10.6 | 9.8 | 6.3 | 1.03 | 6.6 | 8.99 | 166 | 41.1 | 3600 | 6.04 |
| Mean | 9.3 | 9.9 | 7.0 | 1.02 | 7.02 | 273.8 | 45.96 | 3761.7 | 6.17 | |
2.5. Meteorological Conditions
2.6. Statistical Calculations
3. Results
3.1. Evaluation of the Quality of Chips
3.2. Content of Total Sugars and Reducing Sugars
3.3. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Quality Characteristics of Potato Chips
3.4. Correlations Between Potato Chips Quality Parameters—Statistical Analysis
4. Discussion
4.1. The Effect of Sonification on Potato Metabolism and Chip Quality—Current Mechanisms and Practical Implications
- −
- The temperature of 42°C favors water absorption, especially at lower ultrasound powers, which may be due to partial denaturation of cell membranes facilitating diffusion.
- −
- Extraction of reducing sugars is most effective at 35 kHz and 92.5 W/kg (31% reduction), which directly translates into a reduction of the Maillard reaction during frying.
- −
- Changes in colorimetric parameters (↓L, ↑a) confirm the relationship between US treatment and the reduction of non-enzymatic browning.
- −
- A 90% reduction of acrylamide compared to untreated samples proves that sonication can be a key strategy in the production of healthier chips.
4.2. The Effect of Potato Sonication on Sugar Metabolism
- −
- Stronger academic tone (precise terminology, passive voice where appropriate).
- −
- Better readability (logical flow, clear cause-effect relationships).
- −
- Consistent formatting (uniform units, proper citation style).
4.3. The Effect of Ultrasonic Treatment on the Fat Content of Chips
- −
- US treatment at 35-45 kHz for 5-8 minutes allows us to achieve a reduction of the final fat content by 18-22% [47].
- −
- −
- −
- The need for optimization for different potato varieties (different starch content).
- −
- Research on scaling the process with consideration of energy efficiency [46].
- −
- Glucose content in tubers is usually 80.5–97.6% of the coefficient of variation V for the brightness of French fries and 88.4–94.2% for the brightness of potato chips.
- −
- The critical range of glucose content for acceptable products in French fries and chips based on color values (L* and a*) is 12–22 mg/100 g and 8–14 mg/100 g, respectively, for the tested varieties [45].
4.4. The Influence of Varieties on the Quality of Chips
4.4.1. Key Parameters of Chip Quality
4.4.2. Best Varieties for Chip Production
4.4.3. Indications for the Processing Industry
4.5. Influence of Climatic Conditions on the Quality of Raw Material for Chip Production
4.5.1. Influence of Temperature during the Vegetation Period
4.5.2. Effects of Water Stress (Drought/Excessive Rainfall)
4.5.3. Extreme Weather Phenomena
4.5.4. Influence of Storage Conditions (Interaction with Meteorology)
- −
- Climate change is causing an increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, such as heat waves, droughts, floods, storms and hailstorms. Each of these events can negatively affect the yield and quality of the raw material through mechanical damage, water stress, root hypoxia and increased susceptibility to diseases and pests [6,14,17,40,41].
- −
- Elevated CO2 Levels: Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration can modify plant physiology, often stimulating photosynthesis, but at the same time potentially reducing protein and micronutrient content (so-called dilution effect).
- −
- Phenological Changes: Higher temperatures can accelerate plant development cycles, shortening the vegetation period, which can lead to lower yields and changes in the chemical composition of the raw material [17].
- −
- Pest Spread: Climate change can promote the migration and increased activity of pests and pathogens, which indirectly worsens the quality of crops through damage and the need for more intensive plant protection. The observation regarding the ‘Satina’ variety is particularly important, which, despite its recognized stability in terms of reducing sugar content, may be susceptible to heat stress. Current knowledge in this area focuses on:
- −
- Physiological Mechanisms: High temperatures during tuber formation and maturation accelerate respiration and starch metabolism. Under conditions of extreme heat stress, the rate of starch synthesis may be lower than its decomposition into simple sugars (glucose and fructose) and then sucrose. Additionally, heat stress may disrupt the activity of enzymes key to starch synthesis [6,16,17].
- −
- Genotype-Environment Interaction (G x E): Studies [6,15,16,40,41] confirm a strong interaction between genotype and environment. Potato genotype determines the chemical composition of tubers, including the potential content of dry matter, starch and sugars. However, environmental conditions such as temperature, soil moisture, sunlight or fertilization can significantly modify these values. The right proportion of starch and sugars is crucial for obtaining chippy, non-burning chips with the desired color. Some potato genotypes can accumulate the ideal amount of dry matter, starch and reducing sugars only in specific climatic conditions, which is confirmed by the results of the conducted research. In addition, genetics is largely responsible for the shape and size of potato tubers. The environment in which the tubers grow can also affect their uniformity. Uniform, shapely potato tubers are easier to cut into slices of equal thickness, which translate into even frying and better texture of chips. Some genotypes may be more susceptible to deformation in unfavorable soil conditions [7]. Dry matter content: Genotype and environment jointly affect the dry matter content of potatoes. Higher dry matter content usually means lower water content, which is desirable for chip production because it shortens frying time and reduces oil absorption, leading to chips and less greasy chips. Some varieties can only achieve high dry matter content under specific irrigation conditions [7,13,16,42]. Disease and pest resistance: Genetically determined resistance to diseases and pests is crucial for healthy tubers. However, pathogen and pest pressure can vary depending on the environment. A variety that is resistant in one region may be susceptible to another due to different climatic conditions favoring the development of specific pathogens. Healthy potato plants are essential for the production of high-quality chips [Zarzycka et al. 2021, Sawicka et al. 2021]. Both genotype and environment can affect the content of phenolic compounds, which can affect the taste and shelf life of chips. Some potato genotypes naturally have higher levels of these compounds, but their levels can be further modified by growing conditions such as water stress, salt stress, or sunlight [7]. In summary, studies confirming the strong interaction of genotype and environment in the context of potato chips suggest that there is no single “universally best” potato variety. The quality of chips depends largely on whether a given genotype is grown in its optimal environmental conditions. Chip producers, striving to obtain a product of high and stable quality, must consider this complex interaction, carefully selecting both potato varieties, their growing regions, and the agricultural practices used. The studies conducted provide concrete examples of how specific combinations of genotype and environment affect specific quality traits of chips.
4.6. Concordance of Sensory and Visual Assessment and the Impact of Quality Defects
4.7. Research Perspectives
4.8. The Study Identified a Particularly Problematic Relationship
- −
- Raw material selection (reducing sugar content).
- −
- Moisture management during processing.
- −
4.9. Prospects for the Application of Ultrasonic Technology in the Potato Industry
- 4.
-
Sustainable development:
- 5.
-
Comprehensive production approach:
- 6.
-
Directions of technology development:
- −
- Integration with membrane processes in the production of concentrates.
- −
- Use of high-pressure ultrasound for starch modification.
- −
- Development of continuous processing systems for industrial applications.
- −
- Automation and optimization of sonication parameters.
- −
- Research on the impact on the nutritional value of potato products.
- 7.
-
Implementation of ultrasonic technology in the production of chips requires:
- −
- Standardization of processing parameters for different potato varieties.
- −
- Economic analysis of investment and operating costs.
- −
- Long-term studies of agrotechnical effects.
4.10. Limitations of Ultrasound Technology
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| US | Ultrasonic treatment/sonication |
| ROS | Reactive Oxygen Species |
| SOD | Superoxide Dismutase |
| CAT | Catalase |
| Genes related to carbohydrate metabolism: | |
| InvInh2 (invertase inhibitor) | regulates sucrose breakdown |
| UGPase (UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase) | key enzyme in starch synthesis |
| Amyl (amylase genes) | control starch degradation |
| PPO | Polyphenol Oxidase |
| NMR | Nuclear Magnetic Resonance |
| SEM | Scanning Electron Microscopy |
| MALDI-TOF | Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight |
References
- Śliwiński A. Ultrasound and their applications. Publishing House: WNT, Warszawa, 2001, ss. 426.
- Kentish S., Feng H. Applications of Power Ultrasound in Food Processing, Annual Reviews of Food Science and Technology, 2014, 5, 263-284. [CrossRef]
- Kutlu N., Pandiselvam R., Kamiloglu A., Saka I., Sruthi N.U., Kothakota A., Socol C.T., Cristina Maerescu C.M. Impact of ultrasonication applications on color profile of foods. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 89, 2022, 106109, 1-17. [CrossRef]
- Miłowska K. Ultrasound—mechanisms of action and application in sonodynamic therapy. Postępy Hig. Med. Dośw.,2007, 61, 338–349.
- Maksymiec M., Frąckiewicz A., Stasiak D.M. Ultrasonic assisted production of food. [in] (Ed) Szala M., Kropiwiec K., Review of selected issues in the field of the food industry. Wyd. Nauk. TYGIEL, Lublin, 2016, 199-213.
- Sawicka B., Pszczółkowski P., Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz A., Barbaś P, Ćwinal M., Krochmal-Marczak B. The Effect of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Potato Chips and French Fries. Applied Sciences 2021, 11(4). [CrossRef]
- Vaitkevičienė, N., Jariene, E., Kulaitienė, J., & Levickienė, D. The physicochemical and sensory characteristics of colored-flesh potato chips: Influence of cultivar, slice thickness and frying temperature. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(3), 1211. [CrossRef]
- Zhang J., Yu P., Fan L., Sun Y. Effects of ultrasound treatment on the starch properties and oil absorption of potato chips, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2021, 70: 105347, ISSN 1350-4177. [CrossRef]
- Rice C., Taylor J.B., Widom J., Zegart A. The stanford emerging. technology review 2025. A Report on Ten Key Technologies and Their Policy Implications. Editor Herbert S. Lin, Stanford University, Stanford, California, pp. 191, Copyright © 2025 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. https://setr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/2025-01/SETR2025_web-240128.pdf.
- Darsana K., Sivakumar P. Potential of Ultrasound in Food Processing: An Overview. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2023, 42(32): 14-34. [CrossRef]
- Grudzińska M., Zgórska K. Wpływ efektywności zabiegu rekondycjonowania wybranych odmian bulw ziemniaka na barwę frytek. Nauka, Przyr., Technol. 2010, 4: 1-17. (in Polish).
- Grudzińska M., Zgórska K. Wpływ zawartości cukrów w bulwach ziemniaka na barwę chipsów. Żywność Nauka Techno. Jakość, 2008, 5 (60), 107-115. (In Polish).
- Zgórska K., Czerko Z. Rekondycjonowanie bulw przechowywanych w niskiej temperaturze—metoda ograniczająca zawartość cukrów redukujących w bulwach ziemniaka.—Zesz. Prób. Post. Nauk Rol. 2006. 511: 547-556. (In Polish).
- Grudzińska M., Czerko Z., Wierzbicka A., Borowska-Komenda M. Changes in the content of reducing sugars and sucrose in tubers of 11 potato cultivars during long term storage at 5 and 8°C. Acta Agrophysica, 2016, 23: 31–38. (In Polish).
- Sawicka B., Pszczółkowski P. Dry matter and carbohydrates content in the tubers of very early potato varieties cultivated under coverage. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus, 2005, 4: 111–122.
- Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B. Ultrasound Application in Potato Cultivation: Potential for Enhanced Yield and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2024, 16, 108.
- Pszczółkowski, P.; Sawicka, B.; Skiba, D.; Barbaś, P. Enhancing Potato Quality in Fries Production Using Ultrasonic Techniques. Sustainability 2025, 17, 828. [CrossRef]
- Murniece I., Karklina D., Galoburda R., Sabovics M. Reducing sugar and color intensity of fried Latvian potato varieties. Latvijas Lauksaimniecibas Universitate Raksti,2010, 24: 20–30.
- Lenartowicz, T. Potato. In Methodology of Economic Value Analysis of Cultivars (WGO); Publishing House, COBORU: Słupia Wielka, Poland, 2013; p. 34.
- Duer, I.; Fotyma, M.; Madej, A. Code of Good Agricultural Practice; Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Warsaw, Poland, 2004; p. 93. (In Polish).
- Bleinholder, H.; Buhr, L.; Feller, C.; Hack, H.; Hess, M.; Klose, R.; Meier, U.; Stauss, R.; van den Boom, T.; Weber, E.; et al. Compendium of Growth Stage Identification Keys for Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants. The Key to Determining the Development Phases of Mono- and Dicotyledonous Plants on the BBCH Scale; Crowd. Adamczewski, K., Matysiak, K., Eds.; IOR: Pozna, Poland, 2005; pp. 15–33.
- Roztropowicz, S.; Czerko, Z.; Głuska, A.; Goliszewski, W.; Gruczek, T.; Lis, B.; Lutomirska, B.; Nowacki, W.; Rykaczewska, K.; Sowa-Niedziałkowska, G.; et al. Methodical of Observation, Measurements and Sample Take in Agricultural Experiments with Potato; Plant Breeding Acclimatization Institute, Section: Jadwisin, Poland, 1999; p. 50. (In Polish).
- Polish Standard PN-IEC 6003; Standard Voltages IEC. ASLAN Electrical Publishing: Franklin, MA, USA, 1999. Available online: www.aslan.com (accessed on 18 June 2018). (In Polish).
- Lenartowicz, T. Descriptive List of Agricultural Cultivars; COBORU Publishing House: Słupia Wielka, Poland, 2017; p. 38. ISSN 1641-7003. (In Polish).
- Mozolewski, W. Research on Relations between the Quality of Potato Cultivars and the Quality of PC and FF; Monogr.; Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski: Olsztyn, Poland, 2005; p. 77. (In Polish).
- EN ISO 8586: 2014; Sensory Analysis—General Guidelines for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Selected Assessors and Sensory Evaluation Experts. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. Available online: https://sklep.pkn.pl/pn-en-iso-8586-2014-03e. html (accessed on 20 November 2020).
- AOAC. The official methods of analysis of AOAC International by George W. Latimer, 20th ed. 2016, p. 3172. Available online: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/ (accessed in June 2018).
- Kerłowska-Kułas, M. Badanie Jakości Produktów Spożywczych. Państwowe Wyd. Ekonomiczne Warszawa, Poland, 1993; pp. 53–55. (In Polish).
- WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports 106; Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2014.
- Nawrocki, S. Fertilizer Recommendations. Part. I. Limit Numbers for Valuation of Soils in Macro- and Microelements; IUNG, Puławy, Poland, pp. 44, 1991, (In Polish).
- Skowera, B.; Kopcińska, J.; Kopeć, B. Changes in thermal and precipitation conditions in Poland in 1971–2010. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. 2014, 46, 153–162.
- SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide; SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2008.
- Tatarczak, A. Statistics. Vol. I—Textbook Part II—Case studies. Ed. WSEI-Lublin, 277 pp., 2021, ISBN 978-83-66159-83-9. (in Polish).
- IBM SPSS. Statistics—SPSS, 30,0. Operating System Windows, Linux/Unix, Mac OS, 2024.
- Teixeira da Silva J.A., Dobránszki J. Sonication and ultrasound: Impact on plant growth and development. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 2014, 117(2), 131–143. [CrossRef]
- Guiné, R.P.F.; Florença, S.G.; Barroca, M.J.; Anjos, O. The Link between the Consumer and the Innovations in Food Product Development. Foods 2020, 9,1317. [CrossRef]
- Antunes-Rohling, A., Ciudad-Hidalgo, S., Mir-Bel, J., Raso, J., Cebrián, G., Álvarez, I. Ultrasound as a pretreatment to reduce acrylamide formation in fried potatoes. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Volume 49, October 2018, Pages 158-169. [CrossRef]
- Chen J., Yang J., and Sawan M. Emerging trends of integrated-mixed-signal chips in ISSCC 2023. Journal of Semiconductors, 2023, 44(5): 050204. [CrossRef]
- Peraza-Alemán C.M., Arazuri S., Jarén C., de Galarreta J.I.R., Barandalla L., López-Maestresalas A. Predicting the spatial distribution of reducing sugars using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging and chemometrics: a study in multiple potato genotypes, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2025, 235:110323, ISSN 0168-1699. [CrossRef]
- Gugała M., Zarzecka K., Sikorska A., Dołęga H. Changes in sugar content in cultivars potato tubers depending on the weed control methods. Progress in Plant Protection, 2013, 53: 271–275. (In Polish).
- Zarzecka, K.; Gugała, M.; Ginter, A.; Mystkowska, I.; Sikorska, A. The Positive Effects of Mechanical and Chemical Treatments with the Application of Biostimulants in the Cultivation of Solanum tuberosum L. Agriculture 2023, 13, 45. [CrossRef]
- Zgórska K., Grudzińska M. Zmiany wybranych cech jakości bulw ziemniaka w czasie przechowywania, Acta Agrophysica, 2012, 19(1), 203-214. (In Polish).
- Cummins E., Butler F., Gormley R., Brunton N. (2008). A methodology for evaluating the formation and human exposure to acrylamide through fried potato chips. LWT- Food Science and Technology, 41, 854-867.
- Sowa-Niedziałkowska G., Zgórska K. Wpływ czynnika termicznego i odmianowego na zmiany ilościowe w czasie długotrwałego przechowywania bulw ziemniaka. Pam. Puł. 2005, 139, 233-243. (In Polish).
- Gikundi, E.N.; Buzera, A.; Orina, I.; Sila, D. Impact of the Temperature Reconditioning of Cold-Stored Potatoes on the Color of Potato Chips and French Fries. Foods, 2024, 13, 652.
- Nowak A. Acrylamide in food technology: Understanding, mitigating, and innovating. J Food Technol Pres. 2024; 8(1):214.
- Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, W. Influence of storage conditions on sugar content and fry color of potato varieties used for processing. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 103–115.
- Nawaz, A.; Danish, A.; Waseem, A.S.; Shahbaz, H.M.; Khalifa, I.; Ahmed, A.; Irshad, S.; Ahmad, S.; Ahmed, W. Evaluation and storage stability of potato chips made from different varieties of potatoes cultivated in Pakistan. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2021, 45, e15437.
- Mike, G., Baciu, A., Mike L. Studies on the effect of variety on the processing efficiency of potato chips. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1391: IX South-Eastern European Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes. [CrossRef]
- Nahid, M., Akther, S., Hassan, M.K., Uddin, M.N., Zaber, M.A. and Bhuiyan, M.N.I. Quality enhancement of potato chips through acrylamide mitigation and comparison with local potato chips in Bangladesh. Food Research 2024, 8 (6): 48—56.
- Parra-López C., Abdallah S.B., Garcia-Garcia G., Hassoun A., Trollman H., Sandeep Jagtap, Sumit Gupta, Abderrahmane Aït-Kaddour, Sureerat Makmuang, Carmen Carmona-Torres, Digital technologies for water use and management in agriculture: Recent applications and future outlook. Agricultural Water Management, 2025, 309:109347, ISSN 0378-3774. [CrossRef]
- Lisińska G. Czynniki surowcowe i technologiczne kształtujące jakość przetworów ziemniaczanych. I Konferencja Naukowa pt.: „Ziemniak spożywczy i przemysłowy oraz jego przetwarzanie”, 08–11 maja, 2000, Polanica Zdrój, 81-57. (In Polish).
- Zgórska K., Frydecka-Mazurczyk A. 2000. Wpływ warunków w czasie wegetacji oraz temperatury przechowywania na cechy jakości ziemniaków przeznaczonych do przetwórstwa. Biul. IHAR,2000, 213, 239—248. (In Polish).
- Grudzińska M., Zgórska K. 2011. Wpływ zabiegu rekondycjonowania na zmniejszenie zawartości cukrów redukujących w bulwach badanych odmian ziemniaka. Biul. IHAR, 2011, 259, 211–217. (In Polish).
- Lutomirska B. Technologia uprawy ziemniaka przeznaczonego do przetwórstwa. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 2008, 530: 53-67. (In Polish).
- Lisińska G. Wartość technologiczna i jakość konsumpcyjna polskich odmian ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 2006,511, 81-94. (In Polish).
- Khalil, T., Haroon, M., Miskeen, S., Sammi, S., Jahangir, M., Najeeb, S., Nisar, K., Khan, A., 753 Liaquat, M., Khan, I., Ha, J. W. Potato chip varietal analysis: A comparative evaluation based on potato cultivars. Potato Research, 2024, 67(3), 1049-1064.






| Year | Month | Rainfall [mm] | Air temperature [°C] | ||||||
| Decade | Month | Decade | Mean | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 2015 | April | 14.6 | 5.9 | 41.3 | 61.8 | 5.4 | 8.6 | 12.4 | 8.8 |
| May | 23.4 | 13.9 | 83.0 | 120.3 | 12.6 | 12.0 | 13.7 | 12.8 | |
| June | 5.4 | 16.5 | 24.8 | 46.7 | 17.7 | 16.3 | 16.1 | 16.7 | |
| July | 10.5 | 21.6 | 13.1 | 45.2 | 19.6 | 18.7 | 19.9 | 19.4 | |
| August | 0.4 | 0.00 | 5.7 | 6.1 | 23.4 | 20.6 | 20.3 | 21.4 | |
| September | 32.4 | 32.6 | 65.2 | 130.2 | 16.0 | 17.7 | 12.8 | 15.5 | |
| Total | 410.3 | ||||||||
| 2016 | April | 11.5 | 22.2 | 13.4 | 47.1 | 10.9 | 10.1 | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| May | 4.9 | 2.8 | 38.6 | 46.3 | 14.4 | 17.8 | 12.9 | 15.3 | |
| June | 10.1 | 43.2 | 34.0 | 87.3 | 16.6 | 17.5 | 23.0 | 19.1 | |
| July | 22.4 | 30.8 | 60.9 | 114.1 | 19.5 | 20.1 | 21.9 | 20.5 | |
| August | 22.8 | 17.7 | 0.5 | 41.0 | 20.7 | 17.1 | 20.4 | 19.5 | |
| September | 7.6 | 0.10 | 4.1 | 11.8 | 19.5 | 15.5 | 11.5 | 15.5 | |
| Total | 347.6 | ||||||||
| 2017 | April | 6.4 | 7.2 | 38.2 | 51.8 | 10.6 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 8.1 |
| May | 45.1 | 1.3 | 19.1 | 65.5 | 10.5 | 13.0 | 17.4 | 13.7 | |
| June | 1.9 | 9.2 | 12.0 | 23.1 | 16.6 | 17.7 | 20.7 | 18.3 | |
| July | 10.1 | 80.9 | 41.0 | 132.0 | 17.9 | 19.0 | 21.0 | 19.4 | |
| August | 0.4 | 24.4 | 2.2 | 27.0 | 22.8 | 21.3 | 17.1 | 20.3 | |
| September | 38.7 | 35.9 | 8.7 | 83.3 | 16.3 | 15.3 | 12.8 | 14.8 | |
| Total | 382.7 | ||||||||
| Experimental Factors | Chips evaluation parameters | |||
| Color on a 9º scale | Visual assessment on a 5º scale |
Organoleptic evaluation on a 5º scale |
||
| Technologies | Traditional | 6.79 a* | 3.60 a | 3.72 a |
| Ultrasounds | 7.50 b | 4.18 b | 4.22 b | |
| Varieties | ’Denar’ ’Lord’ ’Owacja’ ’Vineta’ ’Satina’ ’Tajfun’ ‘Syrena’ ‘Zagłoba’ |
5.94 a 6.34 ba 6.42 ba 7.96 d 7.28 c 8.36 d 8.17 d 6.70 bc |
3.33 ba 3.06 a 3.28 ba 4.50 d 3.94 c 4.72 d 4.61 d 3.69 bc |
3.44 ba 3.31 a 3.08 a 4.53 d 4.0 c 4.78 d 4.81 d 3.83 bc |
|
Years |
2015 2016 2017 |
7.69 c 6.53 a 7.22 b |
4.11 c 3.68 a 3.89 b |
4.34 b 3.75 a 3.82 a |
| Mean | 7.15 | 3.89 | 3.97 | |
| Experiment Factors | Chips evaluation parameters (%) | ||||
| Discoloration | Humidity | Moist areas | Content of fat | ||
| Technologies | Traditional | 9.35 b* | 2.19 a | 3.43 b | 28.25 b |
| Ultrasounds | 4.64 a | 2.28 a | 1.78 a | 27.27 a | |
| Cultivars | ’Denar’ ’Lord’ ’Owacja’ ’Vineta’ ’Satina’ ’Tajfun’ ‘Syrena’ ‘Zagłoba’ |
6.17 ba 19.61 c 9.83 b 2.44 a 8.61 b 2.78 a 2.72 a 3.78 a |
2.44 ab 3.19 b 2.16 ab 1.92 a 2.26 ab 1.96 a 1.87 a 2.08 ab |
1.72 abc 5.67 e 3.11 dbc 0.28 a 4.78 de 0.56 a 0.83 ab 3.89 dec |
24.30 a 25.30 ab 25.90 b 26.75 b 27.48 b 29.42 b 31.25 b 31.68 b |
| Years | 2015 2016 2017 |
2.88 a 8.92 b 9.19 b |
1.90 a 2.13 ab 2.68 b |
0.60 a 3.27 b 3.94 b |
27.06 a 27.81 a 27.62 a |
| Mean | 6.99 | 2.24 | 2.60 | 26.39 | |
| Specification | y1 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 |
| Average | 7.15 | 3.89 | 3.97 | 2.24 | 6.99 | 2.60 | 27.59 | 1.05 | 0.53 |
| Median | 7.40 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 27.01 | 0.72 | 0.46 |
| Standard deviation | 1.41 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.24 | 9.76 | 4.11 | 2.69 | 0.76 | 0.33 |
| Kurtosis | -0.72 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 78.76 | 7.50 | 3.96 | -1.37 | -1.10 | -1.08 |
| Skewness | -0.51 | -0.71 | -0.73 | 7.76 | 2.53 | 1.89 | 0.28 | 0.65 | 0.48 |
| Range | 5.20 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 14.00 | 50.00 | 20.00 | 7.99 | 2.41 | 1.06 |
| Minimum | 3.80 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24.01 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| Maximum | 9.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 15.00 | 50.00 | 20.00 | 32.00 | 2.59 | 1.15 |
| Variation coefficient V (%) | 19.71 | 23.54 | 23.29 | 55.52 | 139.52 | 157.79 | 9.74 | 72.86 | 63.15 |
| Specification | y1 | x1 | x2 | x3 | x4 | x5 | x6 | x7 | x8 |
| y1 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| x1 | 0.87 | 1.00 | |||||||
| x2 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 1.00 | ||||||
| x3 | -0.14 | -0.25 | -0.26 | 1.00 | |||||
| x4 | -0.62 | -0.71 | -0.67 | 0.18 | 1.00 | ||||
| x5 | -0.38 | -0.54 | -0.58 | 0.20 | 0.67 | 1.00 | |||
| x6 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.43 | -0.20 | -0.30 | -0.11 | 1.00 | ||
| x7 | 0.44 | -0.29 | -0.28 | -0.06 | 0.18 | 0.17 | -0.04 | 1.00 | |
| x8 | -0.54 | -0.38 | -0.37 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.19 | -0.17 | 0.94 | 1.00 |
| Factors | Effect | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Weather conditions | ↑ in cold and humid periods | [40,41] |
| Storage temperature | Optimum: 6–8°C (↑ below 4°C & above 10°C) | [14,40,42] |
| Harvest time | July harvest → 5× higher sugar content than August | [43] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).