Submitted:
19 October 2024
Posted:
25 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Let X be a 3-product space. Let A : D(A) ⊆ X → X , B : D(B) ⊆ X → X and C : D(C) ⊆ X → X be possibly unbounded 3-self-adjoint operators. Then for all x ∈ D(ABC) ∩ D(ACB) ∩ D(BAC) ∩ D(BCA) ∩ D(CAB) ∩ D(CBA) with ⟨x, x, x⟩ = 1, we show that (1) ∆x(3, A)∆x(3, B)∆x(3, C) ≥ |⟨(ABC − aBC − bAC − cAB)x, x, x⟩ + 2abc|, where ∆x(3, A) := ∥Ax − ⟨Ax, x, x⟩x∥, a := ⟨Ax, x, x⟩, b := ⟨Bx, x, x⟩, c := ⟨Cx, x, x⟩. We call Inequality (1) as 3-Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger uncertainty principle. Classical HeisenbergRobertson-Schrodinger uncertainty principle (by Schrodinger in 1930) considers two operators whereas Inequality (1) considers three operators.
Keywords:
Uncertainty Principle
; Banach space
MSC: 46C50; 46B99
1. Introduction
Let be a complex Hilbert space and A be a possibly unbounded self-adjoint linear operator defined on domain . For with , define the uncertainty (also known as variance) of A at the point h as
In 1929, Robertson [1] derived the following mathematical form of the uncertainty principle (term due to Condon [2]) of Heisenberg derived in 1927 [3]. Recall that, for two linear operators and , we define and .
Theorem 1.
In 1930, Schrodinger improved Inequality (1) [8].
Theorem 2.
[8] (Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger Uncertainty Principle) Let and be self-adjoint operators. Then for all with , we have
Theorem 2 leads to the following question.
Question 3.
What is the version of Theorem 2 for three operators?
2. 3-Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger Uncertainty Principle
The Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger uncertainty principle requires the inner product to handle two operators; for three operators, we need a 3-product defined as follows.
Definition 1.
Let be a real Banach space with norm . A map is said to be a 3-product if following conditions hold.
- (i)
- for all , for all bijections .
- (ii)
- for all , for all .
- (iii)
- for all .
- (iv)
- for all .
In this case, we say that is a 3-product space.
Following is the standard example we keep in mind.
Example 1.
Let be a measure space and be the standard real Lebesgue space. Generalized Holder’s inequality says that
Therefore is a 3-product space equipped with 3-product
We next introduce the notion of self-adjointness for operators on 3-product spaces.
Definition 2.
Let be a 3-product space. A possibly unbounded linear operator is said to be 3-self-adjoint if
Example 2.
Consider with the 3-product
Let be any real numbers. Define
Then A is 3-self-adjoint.
Example 3.
Consider (as a real sequence space) with the 3-product
Let be a bounded real sequence. Define
Then A is 3-self-adjoint.
Example 4.
We continue from Example 1. Let . Define
Then A is 3-self-adjoint.
Let be a 3-self-adjoint operator. For with , define the 3-uncertainty of A at the point x as
Theorem 4.
(3-Heisenberg-Robertson-Schrodinger Uncertainty Principle) Let be a 3-product space. Let , and be possibly unbounded 3-self-adjoint operators. Then for all
with , we have
Proof.
First inequality follows from AM-GM inequality for three positive reals. Given
with , set
Then
□
References
- Robertson, H.P. The Uncertainty Principle. Phys. Rev. 1929, 34, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Condon, E.U. Remarks on Uncertainty Principles. In Selected Scientific Papers of E.U. Condon; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 93–96. [Google Scholar]
- Heisenberg, W. The physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics. In Quantum Theory and Measurement; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1983; pp. 62–84. [Google Scholar]
- Cassidy, D.C. Heisenberg, uncertainty and the quantum revolution. Sci. Am. 1992, 266, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. xviii+304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, L.; Mikusiński, P. Introduction to Hilbert spaces with applications; Academic Press, Inc.: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999; pp. xx+551. [Google Scholar]
- Ozawa, M. Heisenberg’s original derivation of the uncertainty principle and its universally valid reformulations. Curr. Sci. 2015, 109, 2006–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schrödinger, E. About Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Bulgar. J. Phys. 1999, 26, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Song, Q.C.; Qiao, C.F. Stronger Schrödinger-like uncertainty relations. Phys. Lett. A 2016, 380, 2925–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kechrimparis, S.; Weigert, S. Heisenberg uncertainty relation for three canonical observables. Phys. Rev. A 2014, 90, 062118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, H.H.; Fei, S.M.; Li-Jost, X. Multi-observable Uncertainty Relations in Product Form of Variances. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 31192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kechrimparis, S.; Weigert, S. Geometry of uncertainty relations for linear combinations of position and momentum. J. Phys. A 2018, 51, 025303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodonov, V.V. Variance uncertainty relations without covariances for three and four observables. Phys. Rev. A 2018, 97, 022105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.