Submitted:
23 August 2024
Posted:
23 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
I. Introduction
a. Background
b. Objectives and Statement of the Problem
c. Significance
d. Scope and Limitations
II. Review of Related Literature
a. Facebook
b. Sleep
c. Parental Involvement
d. Video Games
e. Overcrowding
f. Time Studying
g. English Proficiency
h. Smartphone
i. Traffic
j. Math Proficiency
III. Operational Framework
a. Description of Variables
b. Hypothesized Economic Model
c. A-priori Expectations
| Variable | A-priori Expectation | Expected Sign (+), (-) |
|---|---|---|
| TT | The higher the number of hours spent by the student on the road, the lower his CGPA will be since he will have lesser time for studying. | Negative |
| SL | The higher the number of hours a student spends on sleeping, the higher the CGPA will be. | Positive |
| TV | The higher the number of hours a student spends on watching TV, the lower the CGPA will be. | Negative |
| FB | The higher the number of hours a student spends with his FB account, the lower the CGPA will be. | Negative |
| ST | The higher the number of hours a student spends in studying his lessons, the higher the CGPA will be. | Positive |
| PR | The higher the number of hours parent spend with their children in studying, the higher the CGPA will be. | Positive |
| SP | The higher the number of hours a student spends on tinkering and playing with this smartphone, the lower the CGPA will be. | Negative |
| VD | The higher the number of hours a student spends on playing videogames, the lower the CGPA will be. | Negative |
| EN | The higher the grade for English, the higher the CGPA will be. | Positive |
| MT | The higher the grade for Mathematics, the higher the CGPA will be. | Positive |
| PL | The higher the number of people residing in the domicile house of the student, the lower the CGPA will be. | Negative |
IV. Methodology
a. Data
b. Empirical Procedures
V. Empirical Testing and Analysis of Results
a. Initial Regression
| Coefficient | Std. Error | t-ratio | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| const | 16.4220 | 4.27655 | 3.840 | 0.0002 | *** |
| travel | 0.223133 | 0.149238 | 1.495 | 0.1383 | |
| sleep | 0.0807273 | 0.134431 | 0.6005 | 0.5496 | |
| tv | −0.0738896 | 0.0981106 | −0.7531 | 0.4533 | |
| fb | −0.126405 | 0.111827 | −1.130 | 0.2613 | |
| study | −0.00088793 | 0.124538 | −0.007130 | 0.9943 | |
| parents | −0.00755985 | 0.175285 | −0.04313 | 0.9657 | |
| smartp | 0.0713534 | 0.0939279 | 0.7597 | 0.4494 | |
| video | −0.227662 | 0.0882202 | −2.581 | 0.0114 | ** |
| eng | 0.568322 | 0.0629677 | 9.026 | <0.0001 | *** |
| math | 0.246361 | 0.0513504 | 4.798 | <0.0001 | *** |
| people | 0.0154016 | 0.0936667 | 0.1644 | 0.8698 | |
| Mean dependent var | 87.94231 | S.D. dependent var | 4.121520 | ||
| Sum squared resid | 290.0070 | S.E. of regression | 1.775458 | ||
| R-squared | 0.834249 | Adjusted R-squared | 0.814431 | ||
| F(11, 92) | 42.09538 | P-value(F) | 4.22e-31 | ||
| Log-likelihood | −200.8963 | Akaike criterion | 425.7927 | ||
| Schwarz criterion | 457.5254 | Hannan-Quinn | 438.6485 |
b. Test for Heteroscedasticity
- White’s test for heteroskedasticity -
- Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity -
- Breusch-Pagan test for heteroskedasticity (robust variant) -
c. Test of Normality of Residuals
- Test for normality of residual -
d. Test for Specification Errors
e. Test for Multicollinearity
VI. Corrective Measures and Final Regression
a. Conclusion
b. Implications
References
- Al-Ansari, S. H., & Al-Musawi, N. M. (1999). Test of English as a foreign language and first certificate of English tests as predictors of academic success for undergraduate students at the University of Bahrain. System, 27, 389–399.
- Anand, V. (2007). A Study of Time Management: The Correlation between Video Game Usage and Academic Performance Markers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 552–559. [CrossRef]
- Cho, Y., & Bridgeman, B. (2012). Relationship of TOEFL iBT® scores to academic performance: Some evidence from American universities. Language Testing, 29(3), 421–442. [CrossRef]
- Contreras, D., Delgadillo, J., & Riveros, G. (2019). Is home overcrowding a significant factor in children’s academic performance? Evidence from Latin America. International Journal of Educational Development, 67(March), 1–17. [CrossRef]
- Endalamaw, M. (2017). The Determinants of Academic Performance of Under Graduate Students: In the Case of Arba Minch University Chamo Campus. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 3(4), 35. [CrossRef]
- Fehrmann, P. G., Aubey, L. W., Pottebaum, S. M., Keith, T. Z., & Reimers, T. M. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 373–380. [CrossRef]
- Felisoni, D. D., & Godoi, A. S. (2018). Cell phone usage and academic performance: An experiment. Computers and Education, 117(October 2017), 175–187. [CrossRef]
- Geide-Stevenson, D. (2018). Does English proficiency affect academic performance? International Review of Economics Education, 28(April), 41–48. [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, M. E., & Prichard, J. R. (2018). Calculating the contribution of sleep problems to undergraduates’ academic success. Sleep Health, 4(5), 463–471. [CrossRef]
- Khan, H., Arshad, A., & Furqan, A. (2018). Effect of Sleep Pattern on the Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students. Opthalmology Update, 1(2), 386–391. [CrossRef]
- Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1237–1245. [CrossRef]
- Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. (2006). Academic Performance of College Students: Influence of Time Spent Studying and Working. Journal of Education of Business, (February), 151–160.
- Tigre, R., Sampaio, B., & Menezes, T. (2017). The impact of commuting time on youth’s school performance. Journal of Regional Science, 57(1), 28–47. [CrossRef]
| Dependent Variable | Variable | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| CGPA | Cumulative Grade Pont Average | Represents the latest cumulative grade point average of the student. |
| Independent Variables | ||
| TT | Travel Time | Average number of hours a student spends each day going to and from school. |
| SL | Sleep | Average number of hours of sleep a student has each night. |
| TV | Watching TV | Number of hours a student spends each day in watching TV |
| FB | Number of hours each day a student spends on his/her FB account | |
| ST | Studying Lessons | Number of hours each day a student spends on his/her FB account |
| PR | Parents | Number of hours each day, a parent spends with his/her child in studying lessons or doing assignments. |
| SP | Smartphone | Number of hours each day a student spends playing with his smartphone for texting, calling or leisure surfing of the internet. |
| VD | Videogames | Number of hours each day a student spends on playing video games. |
| EN | English Subject | Final grade in English last academic year. |
| MT | Mathematics Subject | Final grade in Mathematics subject last academic year. |
| PL | People residing in the domicile house | Number of people living in the student’s house. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).