Welcome to the CBC MILP Solver 
Version: 2.10.7 
Build Date: Feb 14 2022 

command line - cbc badzell.lp (default strategy 1)
Continuous objective value is -382420 - 0.00 seconds
Cgl0003I 0 fixed, 0 tightened bounds, 3 strengthened rows, 0 substitutions
Cgl0004I processed model has 208 rows, 377 columns (82 integer (82 of which binary)) and 1266 elements
Cbc0038I Initial state - 14 integers unsatisfied sum - 1.36676
Cbc0038I Pass   1: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 3.10282e+06 iterations 126
Cbc0038I Pass   2: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 3.10282e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass   3: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 1.08489e+07 iterations 48
Cbc0038I Pass   4: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 1.08489e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass   5: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 1.08489e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass   6: suminf.    0.00005 (2) obj. 1.43558e+07 iterations 27
Cbc0038I Pass   7: suminf.    0.00005 (2) obj. 1.43558e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass   8: suminf.    0.00005 (2) obj. 1.43558e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass   9: suminf.    0.00108 (3) obj. 2.20874e+07 iterations 29
Cbc0038I Pass  10: suminf.    0.00008 (2) obj. 2.20874e+07 iterations 1
Cbc0038I Pass  11: suminf.    0.00008 (2) obj. 2.20874e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  12: suminf.    0.00106 (3) obj. 1.90095e+07 iterations 9
Cbc0038I Pass  13: suminf.    0.00006 (2) obj. 1.90095e+07 iterations 1
Cbc0038I Pass  14: suminf.    0.00006 (2) obj. 1.90095e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  15: suminf.    0.00103 (2) obj. 2.41884e+07 iterations 33
Cbc0038I Pass  16: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.41884e+07 iterations 1
Cbc0038I Pass  17: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.41884e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  18: suminf.    0.00005 (1) obj. 2.7753e+07 iterations 22
Cbc0038I Pass  19: suminf.    0.00005 (1) obj. 2.7753e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  20: suminf.    0.00005 (1) obj. 2.7753e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  21: suminf.    0.00007 (2) obj. 2.42811e+07 iterations 19
Cbc0038I Pass  22: suminf.    0.00007 (2) obj. 2.42811e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  23: suminf.    0.00007 (2) obj. 2.42811e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  24: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.39744e+07 iterations 15
Cbc0038I Pass  25: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.39744e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  26: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.39744e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  27: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.29556e+07 iterations 13
Cbc0038I Pass  28: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.29556e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  29: suminf.    0.00003 (1) obj. 2.29556e+07 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  30: suminf.    0.00000 (0) obj. 2.23324e+07 iterations 22
Cbc0038I Rounding solution of 3.00978e+06 is better than previous of 1e+50

Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 7 integers at bound fixed and 176 continuous
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 130 rows 159 columns - too large
Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.03 seconds)
Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of 2.67056e+06
Cbc0038I Pass  30: suminf.    0.00026 (4) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 22
Cbc0038I Pass  31: suminf.    0.00026 (4) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  32: suminf.    0.16517 (6) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 183
Cbc0038I Pass  33: suminf.    0.16517 (6) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 1
Cbc0038I Pass  34: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 51
Cbc0038I Pass  35: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  36: suminf.    0.13555 (6) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 148
Cbc0038I Pass  37: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 29
Cbc0038I Pass  38: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  39: suminf.    0.41260 (5) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 85
Cbc0038I Pass  40: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 30
Cbc0038I Pass  41: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  42: suminf.    0.25903 (4) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 51
Cbc0038I Pass  43: suminf.    0.25903 (4) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 1
Cbc0038I Pass  44: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 30
Cbc0038I Pass  45: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  46: suminf.    0.07140 (6) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 96
Cbc0038I Pass  47: suminf.    0.07140 (6) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 1
Cbc0038I Pass  48: suminf.    0.00004 (3) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 32
Cbc0038I Pass  49: suminf.    0.00004 (3) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  50: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 55
Cbc0038I Pass  51: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  52: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  53: suminf.    0.21624 (2) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 81
Cbc0038I Pass  54: suminf.    0.00000 (0) obj. 2.67056e+06 iterations 22
Cbc0038I Solution found of 2.67056e+06
Cbc0038I Relaxing continuous gives 2.1192e+06
Cbc0038I Rounding solution of 1.65027e+06 is better than previous of 2.1192e+06

Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 18 integers at bound fixed and 89 continuous
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 161 rows 260 columns - 15 fixed gives 147, 244 - still too large
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 136 rows 229 columns - too large
Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.06 seconds)
Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of 1.24374e+06
Cbc0038I Pass  55: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 31
Cbc0038I Pass  56: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  57: suminf.    0.17282 (5) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 226
Cbc0038I Pass  58: suminf.    0.00008 (4) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 108
Cbc0038I Pass  59: suminf.    0.00008 (4) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  60: suminf.    0.04971 (5) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 206
Cbc0038I Pass  61: suminf.    0.04873 (4) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 2
Cbc0038I Pass  62: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 56
Cbc0038I Pass  63: suminf.    0.00003 (2) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  64: suminf.    0.43176 (2) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 103
Cbc0038I Pass  65: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 60
Cbc0038I Pass  66: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  67: suminf.    0.43183 (5) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 148
Cbc0038I Pass  68: suminf.    0.43183 (5) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 2
Cbc0038I Pass  69: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 31
Cbc0038I Pass  70: suminf.    0.00001 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  71: suminf.    0.36741 (5) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 143
Cbc0038I Pass  72: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 40
Cbc0038I Pass  73: suminf.    0.00002 (2) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  74: suminf.    0.32866 (7) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 125
Cbc0038I Pass  75: suminf.    0.32769 (6) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 3
Cbc0038I Pass  76: suminf.    0.00005 (3) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 57
Cbc0038I Pass  77: suminf.    0.00005 (3) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  78: suminf.    0.25437 (5) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 141
Cbc0038I Pass  79: suminf.    0.00004 (3) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass  80: suminf.    0.00004 (3) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  81: suminf.    0.26589 (4) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 141
Cbc0038I Pass  82: suminf.    0.00002 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass  83: suminf.    0.00002 (1) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  84: suminf.    0.49547 (3) obj. 1.24374e+06 iterations 97
Cbc0038I Rounding solution of 147412 is better than previous of 1.65027e+06

Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 10 integers at bound fixed and 62 continuous
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 173 rows 289 columns - 5 fixed gives 169, 285 - still too large
Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.09 seconds)
Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of -11537.9
Cbc0038I Pass  84: suminf.    0.00136 (4) obj. -11537.9 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass  85: suminf.    0.00136 (4) obj. -11537.9 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  86: suminf.    0.44740 (8) obj. -11537.9 iterations 174
Cbc0038I Pass  87: suminf.    0.32112 (8) obj. -11537.9 iterations 33
Cbc0038I Pass  88: suminf.    0.08847 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 24
Cbc0038I Pass  89: suminf.    0.00037 (6) obj. -11537.9 iterations 31
Cbc0038I Pass  90: suminf.    0.00037 (6) obj. -11537.9 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass  91: suminf.    0.61692 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 129
Cbc0038I Pass  92: suminf.    0.21300 (5) obj. -11537.9 iterations 46
Cbc0038I Pass  93: suminf.    0.22779 (5) obj. -11537.9 iterations 24
Cbc0038I Pass  94: suminf.    0.87864 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 95
Cbc0038I Pass  95: suminf.    0.63537 (8) obj. -11537.9 iterations 40
Cbc0038I Pass  96: suminf.    0.39871 (4) obj. -11537.9 iterations 46
Cbc0038I Pass  97: suminf.    0.30679 (5) obj. -11537.9 iterations 77
Cbc0038I Pass  98: suminf.    0.39776 (4) obj. -11537.9 iterations 39
Cbc0038I Pass  99: suminf.    1.00926 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 54
Cbc0038I Pass 100: suminf.    0.97626 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 16
Cbc0038I Pass 101: suminf.    0.08451 (5) obj. -11537.9 iterations 39
Cbc0038I Pass 102: suminf.    0.00006 (3) obj. -11537.9 iterations 24
Cbc0038I Pass 103: suminf.    0.00006 (3) obj. -11537.9 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass 104: suminf.    0.54698 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 110
Cbc0038I Pass 105: suminf.    0.19971 (6) obj. -11537.9 iterations 48
Cbc0038I Pass 106: suminf.    0.22956 (5) obj. -11537.9 iterations 48
Cbc0038I Pass 107: suminf.    1.16948 (7) obj. -11537.9 iterations 69
Cbc0038I Pass 108: suminf.    0.34121 (4) obj. -11537.9 iterations 54
Cbc0038I Pass 109: suminf.    0.39302 (3) obj. -11537.9 iterations 68
Cbc0038I Pass 110: suminf.    0.40737 (4) obj. -11537.9 iterations 96
Cbc0038I Pass 111: suminf.    0.30072 (6) obj. -11537.9 iterations 19
Cbc0038I Pass 112: suminf.    0.24056 (3) obj. -11537.9 iterations 43
Cbc0038I Pass 113: suminf.    0.13573 (2) obj. -11537.9 iterations 68
Cbc0038I Rounding solution of -41703.3 is better than previous of 147412

Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 27 integers at bound fixed and 99 continuous
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 162 rows 249 columns - 10 fixed gives 147, 236 - still too large
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 147 rows 236 columns - too large
Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.12 seconds)
Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of -143918
Cbc0038I Pass 113: suminf.    0.00166 (4) obj. -143918 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass 114: suminf.    0.00166 (4) obj. -143918 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass 115: suminf.    0.53240 (10) obj. -143918 iterations 165
Cbc0038I Pass 116: suminf.    0.16621 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 32
Cbc0038I Pass 117: suminf.    0.21256 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 23
Cbc0038I Pass 118: suminf.    0.75854 (11) obj. -143918 iterations 93
Cbc0038I Pass 119: suminf.    0.37894 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 45
Cbc0038I Pass 120: suminf.    0.38776 (6) obj. -143918 iterations 19
Cbc0038I Pass 121: suminf.    1.40962 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 109
Cbc0038I Pass 122: suminf.    0.65729 (5) obj. -143918 iterations 60
Cbc0038I Pass 123: suminf.    0.92859 (5) obj. -143918 iterations 24
Cbc0038I Pass 124: suminf.    1.60792 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 50
Cbc0038I Pass 125: suminf.    1.09543 (6) obj. -143918 iterations 40
Cbc0038I Pass 126: suminf.    0.75504 (5) obj. -143918 iterations 49
Cbc0038I Pass 127: suminf.    0.65866 (5) obj. -143918 iterations 32
Cbc0038I Pass 128: suminf.    0.92769 (5) obj. -143918 iterations 26
Cbc0038I Pass 129: suminf.    0.71330 (3) obj. -143918 iterations 86
Cbc0038I Pass 130: suminf.    0.71010 (4) obj. -143918 iterations 14
Cbc0038I Pass 131: suminf.    0.24992 (3) obj. -143918 iterations 32
Cbc0038I Pass 132: suminf.    0.17633 (2) obj. -143918 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass 133: suminf.    0.24992 (3) obj. -143918 iterations 27
Cbc0038I Pass 134: suminf.    0.99592 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 76
Cbc0038I Pass 135: suminf.    0.51419 (6) obj. -143918 iterations 45
Cbc0038I Pass 136: suminf.    0.61073 (6) obj. -143918 iterations 36
Cbc0038I Pass 137: suminf.    0.59050 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 48
Cbc0038I Pass 138: suminf.    0.64106 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 32
Cbc0038I Pass 139: suminf.    1.00926 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 94
Cbc0038I Pass 140: suminf.    0.85443 (7) obj. -143918 iterations 47
Cbc0038I Pass 141: suminf.    0.42026 (6) obj. -143918 iterations 53
Cbc0038I Pass 142: suminf.    0.35291 (6) obj. -143918 iterations 38
Cbc0038I Rounding solution of -116873 is better than previous of -41703.3

Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 26 integers at bound fixed and 89 continuous
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 164 rows 250 columns - 13 fixed gives 153, 235 - still too large
Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.16 seconds)
Cbc0038I Round again with cutoff of -239319
Cbc0038I Pass 142: suminf.    0.00188 (4) obj. -239319 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass 143: suminf.    0.00188 (4) obj. -239319 iterations 0
Cbc0038I Pass 144: suminf.    0.46699 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 136
Cbc0038I Pass 145: suminf.    0.46676 (6) obj. -239319 iterations 25
Cbc0038I Pass 146: suminf.    0.36923 (4) obj. -239319 iterations 37
Cbc0038I Pass 147: suminf.    0.24034 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 66
Cbc0038I Pass 148: suminf.    1.28621 (6) obj. -239319 iterations 119
Cbc0038I Pass 149: suminf.    0.61095 (6) obj. -239319 iterations 50
Cbc0038I Pass 150: suminf.    1.01494 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 58
Cbc0038I Pass 151: suminf.    0.49529 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 33
Cbc0038I Pass 152: suminf.    0.54698 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 29
Cbc0038I Pass 153: suminf.    0.49034 (4) obj. -239319 iterations 35
Cbc0038I Pass 154: suminf.    0.83028 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 33
Cbc0038I Pass 155: suminf.    0.58490 (4) obj. -239319 iterations 33
Cbc0038I Pass 156: suminf.    0.80581 (9) obj. -239319 iterations 123
Cbc0038I Pass 157: suminf.    0.54007 (7) obj. -239319 iterations 30
Cbc0038I Pass 158: suminf.    0.61095 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass 159: suminf.    0.57720 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 17
Cbc0038I Pass 160: suminf.    0.61204 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 36
Cbc0038I Pass 161: suminf.    1.22444 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 78
Cbc0038I Pass 162: suminf.    0.48810 (6) obj. -239319 iterations 58
Cbc0038I Pass 163: suminf.    0.81705 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 83
Cbc0038I Pass 164: suminf.    0.71635 (6) obj. -239319 iterations 89
Cbc0038I Pass 165: suminf.    0.45918 (7) obj. -239319 iterations 8
Cbc0038I Pass 166: suminf.    1.11812 (8) obj. -239319 iterations 64
Cbc0038I Pass 167: suminf.    0.62220 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 38
Cbc0038I Pass 168: suminf.    1.09634 (9) obj. -239319 iterations 55
Cbc0038I Pass 169: suminf.    1.95073 (10) obj. -239319 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass 170: suminf.    0.46968 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 41
Cbc0038I Pass 171: suminf.    0.46968 (5) obj. -239319 iterations 4
Cbc0038I Rounding solution of -212275 is better than previous of -116873

Cbc0038I Before mini branch and bound, 36 integers at bound fixed and 105 continuous
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 151 rows 236 columns - 6 fixed gives 144, 230 - still too large
Cbc0038I Mini branch and bound did not improve solution (0.19 seconds)
Cbc0038I After 0.19 seconds - Feasibility pump exiting with objective of -212275 - took 0.18 seconds
Cbc0012I Integer solution of -273481.08 found by feasibility pump after 0 iterations and 0 nodes (0.19 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 81 rows 145 columns
Cbc0031I 62 added rows had average density of 13.854839
Cbc0013I At root node, 62 cuts changed objective from -382420.29 to -364842.82 in 100 passes
Cbc0014I Cut generator 0 (Probing) - 250 row cuts average 2.1 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.094 seconds - new frequency is 1
Cbc0014I Cut generator 1 (Gomory) - 6 row cuts average 20.0 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.048 seconds - new frequency is -100
Cbc0014I Cut generator 2 (Knapsack) - 0 row cuts average 0.0 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.025 seconds - new frequency is -100
Cbc0014I Cut generator 3 (Clique) - 0 row cuts average 0.0 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.001 seconds - new frequency is -100
Cbc0014I Cut generator 4 (MixedIntegerRounding2) - 111 row cuts average 11.8 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.021 seconds - new frequency is 1
Cbc0014I Cut generator 5 (FlowCover) - 0 row cuts average 0.0 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.011 seconds - new frequency is -100
Cbc0014I Cut generator 6 (TwoMirCuts) - 22 row cuts average 96.4 elements, 0 column cuts (0 active)  in 0.010 seconds - new frequency is 1
Cbc0010I After 0 nodes, 1 on tree, -273481.08 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (0.54 seconds)
Cbc0012I Integer solution of -276207.97 found by DiveCoefficient after 876 iterations and 3 nodes (0.65 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 68 rows 136 columns
Cbc0012I Integer solution of -286178.36 found by rounding after 1385 iterations and 45 nodes (0.94 seconds)
Cbc0012I Integer solution of -286678.08 found by rounding after 1398 iterations and 50 nodes (0.94 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 53 rows 89 columns
Cbc0012I Integer solution of -297763.81 found by rounding after 1784 iterations and 230 nodes (1.72 seconds)
Cbc0004I Integer solution of -297763.81 found after 1792 iterations and 232 nodes (1.73 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 54 rows 90 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 55 rows 91 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 63 rows 104 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 59 rows 99 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 57 rows 97 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 58 rows 98 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 57 rows 97 columns
Cbc0010I After 1000 nodes, 263 on tree, -297763.81 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (3.18 seconds)
Cbc0012I Integer solution of -303830.92 found by rounding after 5179 iterations and 1188 nodes (3.24 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 58 rows 95 columns
Cbc0010I After 2000 nodes, 134 on tree, -303830.92 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (3.92 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 55 rows 92 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 77 rows 150 columns
Cbc0010I After 3000 nodes, 20 on tree, -303830.92 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (5.84 seconds)
Cbc0010I After 4000 nodes, 9 on tree, -303830.92 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (6.27 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 63 rows 104 columns
Cbc0010I After 5000 nodes, 22 on tree, -303830.92 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (7.18 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 73 rows 146 columns
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 73 rows 146 columns
Cbc0010I After 6000 nodes, 31 on tree, -303830.92 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (8.53 seconds)
Cbc0016I Integer solution of -306710.23 found by strong branching after 50103 iterations and 6218 nodes (8.66 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 75 rows 152 columns
Cbc0010I After 7000 nodes, 24 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (9.41 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 58 rows 100 columns
Cbc0010I After 8000 nodes, 132 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (10.33 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 60 rows 102 columns
Cbc0010I After 9000 nodes, 122 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (10.99 seconds)
Cbc0038I Full problem 208 rows 377 columns, reduced to 61 rows 106 columns
Cbc0010I After 10000 nodes, 85 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (13.58 seconds)
Cbc0010I After 11000 nodes, 39 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -364842.82 (15.40 seconds)
Cbc0010I After 12000 nodes, 227 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -322214.44 (16.60 seconds)
Cbc0010I After 13000 nodes, 297 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -316149.81 (17.12 seconds)
Cbc0010I After 14000 nodes, 163 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -316149.81 (18.65 seconds)
Cbc0010I After 15000 nodes, 202 on tree, -306710.23 best solution, best possible -310726.34 (19.42 seconds)
Cbc0001I Search completed - best objective -306710.2336332147, took 163078 iterations and 15792 nodes (19.83 seconds)
Cbc0032I Strong branching done 16250 times (171884 iterations), fathomed 1785 nodes and fixed 1680 variables
Cbc0035I Maximum depth 51, 15657 variables fixed on reduced cost
Cuts at root node changed objective from -382420 to -364843
Probing was tried 2972 times and created 1029 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.203 seconds)
Gomory was tried 100 times and created 6 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.048 seconds)
Knapsack was tried 100 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.025 seconds)
Clique was tried 100 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.001 seconds)
MixedIntegerRounding2 was tried 2971 times and created 1825 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.285 seconds)
FlowCover was tried 100 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.011 seconds)
TwoMirCuts was tried 2970 times and created 25 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.136 seconds)
ZeroHalf was tried 1 times and created 0 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.000 seconds)
ImplicationCuts was tried 260 times and created 94 cuts of which 0 were active after adding rounds of cuts (0.004 seconds)

Result - Optimal solution found

Objective value:                -306710.23363321
Enumerated nodes:               15792
Total iterations:               163078
Time (CPU seconds):             19.84
Time (Wallclock seconds):       19.99

Total time (CPU seconds):       19.85   (Wallclock seconds):       19.99

