Using Lorentz Violation for Early Universe GW Generation Due to Black Hole Destruction in the Early Universe as by Freeze

We are using information from a paper deriving a Lorentz-violating energy-momentum relation entailing an exact momentum cut of as stated by G. Salesi. Salesi in his work allegedly defines Pre Planckian physics, whereas we restrict our given application to GW generation and DE formation in the first 10 −39 s to 10 −33 s or so seconds in the early universe. This procedure is enacted due to an earlier work whereas referees exhibited puzzlement as to the physical mechanism for release of Gravitons in the very early universe. The calculation is meant to be complementary to work done in the Book “Dark Energy” by M. Li, X-D. Li, and Y. Wang, and also a calculation for Black hole destruction as outlined by Karen Freeze, et al. The GW generation will be when there is sufficient early universe density so as to break apart Relic Black holes but we claim that this destruction is directly linked to a Lorentz violating energy-momentum G. Salesi derived, which we adopt, with a mass m added in the G. Salesi energy momentum results proportional to a tiny graviton mass, times the number of gravitons in the first 10 −43 seconds.


Introduction
What we are doing here is to utilize having the results of Salesi [1] as to a given actual Lorentz-violating energy-momentum relationship which we utilize to elucidate graviton contributions to an early universe derivation of DE, and the cosmological constant. The idea for this is based upon a referee and academic editor who felt puzzled as to the work done earlier [2] which postulated the existence of a breakup of primordial black holes as by itself contributing to DE, How to cite this paper: Beckwith and this publication is intended to fill in the actual conceptual gaps which lead to [2] having such a rocky reception. [2] was initiated specifically because work done in [3] as to a multiverse, was not well received, for reasons the author was told as in the eight equation of [3] one reviewer made the utterly outrageous statement that the author was modeling the Universe as a harmonic oscillator which is a canard since that equation was comparing the first integral of the Einstein-Hilbert action to an action for an initial spherical well, as by John Klauder as cited by the author in [4] so called enhanced quantization techniques [5].
In a nutshell, the author is trying to defuse mythologies which are in the way of a treatment of DE, which has been put in place by reviewers and a particular academic editor and the latest would allow for understanding the author's use of Miao Li, et al. [6].
In particular, the author hopes that judicious use of [1] will allow as to the use of [7] which several academic editors and reviewers took out of context and trivialized.
This will lead us to utilize the statement given by [8] linking the cosmological constant and massive gravity as given by g m c We state that this break up of primordial black holes would be enough to create an initial "sea" of gravitons, due to Equation (1) which would then add up to be in effect a value for a sufficient number of early universe gravitons, which would be added up per unit volume, to in fact sum up to an energy density equivalent to Equation (1) so we have massive gravitons and DE. Hence we will be adding up the number of gravitons which may be released due to Equation (2) and [9] which states the number of gravitons which may be emitted due to a black hole as given in it's page 47 is 0.1 percent of emitted energy from a nonrotating black hole. Keep in mind that this is for black holes, as given in [9] with mass: centimeter, whereas we can and will define Black holes of 10 −5 grams which would be for less than a centimeter radii just after the start of inflation.
Unfortunately due to an unnamed editor, this picture as attested by Karen Freeze was deemed insufficiently rigorously motivated, and the fact it was put up and deemed allegedly not rigorous, means that we will be forced to have the backup done by [1] as stated. It is important to keep in mind that this was put in to give substance to the modeling given by [6] which is in both [2] and [3], In stating this we have to consider that ( ) This is going to create difficulties which is going to lend us to utilize [1] directly and more so we have a way to refine the argument given in Equation (4) (6) and if we use the first order Romberg numerical integration scheme as given in [10], page 695, so then for high temperature, We will then in the next section interpret Equation (7) when we set

Interpreting Equation (7) When Equation (7a) Is Used, So as to Ascertain the Number of Gravitons
We are then looking at [1], Using the Planck units renormalized such that 1 , we have that we are looking at resetting Equation (7b) so that the above will be roughly, 65 60 10 10 We then can up to a modeling round off make the following approximation, 57 60 10 10 2 4 10 0 This would be about 1000 to 10,000 destroyed mini black holes in less than 1.057 times 10 −10 of a light year in radial distance for 1 Planck mass of radiated gravitons, in far less than 10 −1 seconds in cosmological expansion.
The Universe was once just the radius of the Earth-to-the-Sun, which hap-

What 10 57 Gravitons in a Radius of 1000 Kilometers Means in Terms of DE and a Cosmological Constant Calculation
We will first of all refer to an early universe treatment of the uncertainty principle is, in the startup of inflationary cosmology [11].
( ) Also we will set The value of time t will be set as t ~(10 −32 s/t(Planck)) whereas we can utilize the ideas of having Planck time set ~5 × 10 −44 seconds, hence, t ~10 12  1000 km 6.25 10 1 The interesting thing, is that the factor of roughly 10 −120 shows up in this situation so as to imply that there may be some linkage between setting the effective and that these together will lead to a cosmological Constant, Λ of the sort which we will be able to refer to later, for Gravitons and to thereby have 10 −8 g for gravitons, per black hole of mass 10 −5 g If one has say 10 57 gravitons, for a 1000 kilometer regime as say in the first 10 −32 Seconds we then have for 10 −65 g per graviton, we are then having for gravitons a value of to be diverted to 10 −8 g per black hole.
And then for when one has if one has a heat strength of A, for this radial "shell" S ∈ , Then one has the following "integration" in the region of "space-time", ( ) Following the line of reasoning, we will be examining briefly how this bubble-shell start to cosmology could commence, and how to interpret both Equation (16) and Equation (17) For sufficiently small γ . The above could be represented by [3] This would lead to a minimal relationship between change in E and change in time as represented by Equation (19), so that we could to first order, say be looking at something very close to the traditional Heisenberg uncertainty principle results of approximately, ( ) Or, Having brought this up, let us then go to the Rosen [16] version of cosmology, and this needs explanation due to its rescaling of the values of the comology time and temperatures involved. The key point of this mini chapter will be to summarize derivation of the space-time temperature [16].  Here, the density function is given by Equation (12) and Equation (13), for our application and also we obtain for black holes a break up criteria for mass m Black holes if,  [17] postulated in the initial phases of cosmology a situation for which we have no conservation of energy, and in fact this is exactly the situation we could be portraying here, that is if [2] and the description of the Rosen cosmology as in [16] are not wrong.
Quote, from [17]: The spontaneous symmetry broken phase will induce a violation of conservation of energy and explain the generation of matter in the very early universe.
End of quote: This would be doable if the initial phases of creation of the Universe follow [16] and if we utilize, initially a near zero temperature start regime in the early universe, as in [16]. The early universe will have an energy input via thermal inputs of a value commensurate with [2].

Conclusion: Using Equation (27) in Conjunction with Reference [16] [17] and Equation [5] for Symmetry Breaking and Its Possible Tie in with DE
According to [17], Quote: The spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism in the vierbein gauge for-Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology malism has 3 massless degrees of freedom associated with the O(3) rotational invariance, and 3 massive degrees of freedom associated with the broken Lorentz "boosts". The massive quantum gravity in 3 + 1 dimensions can satisfy unitarity and be renormalizable, in contrast to the D = 4 quantum gravity which will violate unitarity if renormalizable [18].
End of quote: In short, the idea in the presentation I am doing is that there would be a massless situation until after the turn about point of thermal heating of the Big Bang universe, and this would correspond to symmetry breaking precisely due to the Equation (27) formulation allowing for a massless regime of space-time before the end of inflation, whereas after the end of inflation, we can use the black hole destruction idea given in [7] directly so as to commence.
After we have this value satisfied, set from Equation (11) and Equation (12) setting up the formulation of conditions for the creation of DE according to which we are looking at in the regime of space-time from less than a meter in radii to 1000 km in radii we have the formation of DE with the given frequency, for setting up DE, and then by default the Cosmological constant.
( ) Using the ideas of [17] and [18], the Lorentz violation would ensue in this situation as largely a byproduct of the situation outlined in [17] whereas on page 4 of that article we have, Quote: At the Planck energy E(Planck) the local Lorentz vacuum symmetry is spontaneously broken. We postulate the existence of a field, φ, and assume that the vacuum expectation value (vev) of the field, <φ>, will vanish for E = Ec < E(Planck) or at a temperature T < Tc ~ M(Planck) End of quote: We argue that if the build-up of temperature is commensurate with [16] occurs in an early universe and that if we have no DE before the end of inflation and that if DE commences in being created with the use of Equation (28) for the start of DE and the breakup of black holes, via the mechanism brought up by [16]. Mofatt appeals to a generalization of the Wheeler De Witt equation, via complex time whereas our approach takes as its starting point for Lorentz symmetry breaking an influx of "heat" via [16] as well as then applying the nonlinear dispersion relationship given in Equation (5) which is allowed to commence in full generality at the "turning point" of thermality which Rosen and Israelit conceived of.
Furthermore we should investigate if there is a linkage in any sense between Equation (28) and the ideas brought up by Novello [8] which we regard as significant and worthy of review in their own right. And we will be investigating if [19] brings up issues which are relevant to future inquires in this matter so presented. We also state that we are now assuming an interlude of quantum involvement with this problem if and when Equation (21), the deformed relativity Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology modifications of the HUP are involved, as we claim they will be involved, especially after the turn about regime where temperatures of the Universe cease to be monotonically rising, and the breakup of primordial black holes commences. The author is aware of prior refereeing, as in opposition to [2] and states that a timely use of Equation (15), Equation (16) and Equation (17) may prove useful in ascertaining a linkage between a pre Planckian Universe state, and the Universe as of today. More of which may be introduced in a timely fashion by the author in future publications plus [20].