Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

A Review Paper on Decision Making using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Techniques in Different Types of Project Management

Version 1 : Received: 4 December 2019 / Approved: 5 December 2019 / Online: 5 December 2019 (11:30:08 CET)

How to cite: Sirshar, M.; Hanif, I.; Shahzad, S. A Review Paper on Decision Making using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Techniques in Different Types of Project Management. Preprints 2019, 2019120068 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201912.0068.v1). Sirshar, M.; Hanif, I.; Shahzad, S. A Review Paper on Decision Making using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) Techniques in Different Types of Project Management. Preprints 2019, 2019120068 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201912.0068.v1).

Abstract

Today project management in every field of life is prerequisite for the success of project by increasing quality reduces cost and schedule. But selecting tools and techniques to achieve our objectives and implement our plan fully is very difficult task because choice creates complexity. So, we discuss AHP to make decision simple. Ranking critical success factor, cloud computing services, risk prioritization, selection of right ETL software and many other systems AHP plays its important role. For the improvement of today’s complex systems it is very important to prioritize and select projects to remove the root cause of the problem. To attain the right selection of construction equipment for carrying out schedule tasks with high efficiency, production and financial capability is the main purpose of procurement of construction equipment process. Certain conflicts can occur due to the construction of UML models in a collaborative way. AHP is used to remove these conflicts and for establishing and evaluating modelers judgments. Nowadays it is very important and critical decision to choose the best option from multiple alternatives for a successful career after passing 12th standard and also it affects our future. “AHP and TOPSIS” methods are used for this purpose. In this paper, an “AHP and Fuzzy AHP” based hierarchical trust model has been used to rate the service providers and their various plans for infrastructure as a service.

Subject Areas

Analytical Hierarchy process; AHP; fuzzy; project management; risk prioritization; critical success factors; ETL; MCDM; TOPSIS

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.