Preprint Review Version 1 This version is not peer-reviewed

A Systematic Literature Review of Research Methodologies Used for Evaluation of Augmented Reality Based Learning Applications

Version 1 : Received: 4 December 2019 / Approved: 5 December 2019 / Online: 5 December 2019 (08:54:35 CET)

How to cite: Sirshar, M.; Baig, H.S.; Ali, S.H. A Systematic Literature Review of Research Methodologies Used for Evaluation of Augmented Reality Based Learning Applications. Preprints 2019, 2019120065 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201912.0065.v1). Sirshar, M.; Baig, H.S.; Ali, S.H. A Systematic Literature Review of Research Methodologies Used for Evaluation of Augmented Reality Based Learning Applications. Preprints 2019, 2019120065 (doi: 10.20944/preprints201912.0065.v1).

Abstract

With the advancement in AR technology, more education-based applications are being developed using Augmented Reality, which has revolutionized the learning experience. However, in order to determine the application’s impact on student’s motivation, performance and their communication with the lecturer, various studies are conducted. These studies use one of the three research methodologies for data analysis and evaluation. In this systematic review, we have analyzed various research methodologies for system evaluation of the AR learning applications and recorded the student response toward the system. Also, we checked which methodology is preferred by researchers and why. A total number of 25 studies were analyzed which were published during the year of 2015 and 2019. The results indicate that most popular research technique is mixed methodology as it combines both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The purpose of this review is to offer new insights to researchers and provide them with advice about evaluation of AR applications and which tool or technique is more effective.

Subject Areas

augmented reality; mixed reality; learning applications; SLR; AR evaluation; research methods; AR in education

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.